comscore Girl in alleged Waianae High School rape testifies during trial | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Top News

Girl in alleged Waianae High School rape testifies during trial

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now

Lawyers defending Hawaii’s public school system in a lawsuit alleging a special education student raped his female classmate called the girl to testify in the trial today, but didn’t ask her any questions about the 2013 incident.

A lawsuit by the girl’s mother says that Waianae High School officials didn’t do enough to prevent the alleged assault and didn’t take the allegations seriously. The lawsuit says a then-senior boy in the then-freshman girl’s class raped her in a unisex bathroom.

Assistant state Attorney General Marie Gavigan, defending the state Department of Education, asked mostly yes or no questions about letters the girl wrote in class, such as was one of the letters about a field trip.

Under questioning by her mother’s attorney, Michael Green, the girl wasn’t able to read a letter she typed in 2013. He says the girl has the intellectual capacity of a second-grader.

Later, during his closing argument to jurors, Green said it was “desperate” for the state to call the mentally disabled girl to the witness stand. “What kind of sick minds are these,” he said. “They call her to testify?”

School officials had a duty to keep the two students safe — even from each other, Green said. They knew there was a previous inappropriate touching incident between the two when they went off campus several months before the alleged rape, he said.

A doctor who examined the girl the next day testified that she had tears consistent with a sexual assault. The defense argued those tears could have been caused by something else, such as her scratching herself.

Surveillance footage taken near the bathroom doesn’t show that the students were inside at the same time, Gavigan said.

“It is our position there was no sexual assault in the bathroom,” Gavigan said in her closing statement. “But something must have happened between these two.” That could have been kissing, but it’s not known, she said.

Kristin Lindquist, the students’ former teacher and a defendant in the lawsuit, testified that when the boy returned from the bathroom he looked “sick,” so she asked him what happened. He told her he touched the girl and asked if he would be suspended, she said. She testified that she asked him if he touched her in her private areas and he said yes. It was a mistake to ask such “pointed” questions, Lindquist said, adding that she made the same mistake while questioning the girl about what happened. The girl told the teacher she was raped in the bathroom.

The teacher took immediate action and reported the incident to the dean of students, who called the police and had the boy removed from school, Gavigan told the jury in her closing.

After the mother filed the lawsuit, the education department sued the boy, saying that if the school is found liable, the boy, now 21, should be responsible. The boy’s biological mother shook him as an infant, likely causing his disabilities, his adoptive mother testified. He doesn’t understand the allegations against him, she said.

Green asked jurors to award the mother $1.4 million in damages and $1.8 million to the girl.

Jurors are expected to begin deliberations on Friday.

Comments (4)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

  • Does the special ed boy know how to have sex? Maybe it is relevant to have the girl testify to find out exactly what took place and the severity of the sexual assault. I sympathize with the parents but teachers are not and should not be expected to be personal body guards for every child in the class room. Tough one but this case will end in an out of court monetary settlement. State loses another one.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up