As Obama leaves office, Democrats look for new leaders
ASSOCIATED PRESS
In this Oct. 24, 2016, file photo, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. speaks at a rally for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H.
WASHINGTON >> President Barack Obama hands over the White House to Republican Donald Trump in 70 days, leaving the Democratic Party leaderless and with few up-and-coming stars among its aging stalwarts.
In what appeared to be a wave election, Republicans also secured majorities they already enjoyed in the Senate and the House and in governor’s mansions and state legislatures across the country. Democrats were all but wiped out in places like Iowa and Kentucky.
The defeat of Hillary Clinton, an experienced Washington politician who sought common ground with Republicans, could make it more likely that the party will turn to its liberal wing as it grapples with its future. That’s best represented by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, whom Clinton defeated in a long primary, and Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a pull-no-punches progressive darling.
The Democratic Party should remold itself in the image of Warren and Sanders “and offer a systemic critique of the rigged economy” that appeals to the same voters who put Trump over the top, said Adam Green, co-founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee.
Green said Democrats must make a “conscious decision to separate themselves from the corporate villains who are to a large extent funding their campaigns.”
Trump’s open warfare with Republican leaders over the past year and a half obscured the extent of the Democrats’ crisis, and they are only now beginning to contend with it.
“This is painful, and it will be for a long time,” Clinton said in her concession speech Wednesday in New York. She implored those who want to fight for Democratic values — particularly young voters — to participate every day, not just every four years.
Hawaii Sen. Brian Schatz urged careful deliberation as the Democratic reckoning begins. He said the “rush to recalibrate” strategy and messaging concerns him.
“Democrats need to take, not forever, but weeks and months to diagnose what just happened to us and why,” he said.
But the outlook for Democrats may well get worse before it improves.
In two years, they will be defending about two dozen Senate seats, including at least five in deep-red states. That election could hand Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell a filibuster-proof majority, further clearing the way for a conservative policy agenda.
“We have to ask ourselves what is wrong with our party,” said Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, arguing it’s at least in part a failure to connect with working-class people who are hurting.
One small Democratic bright spot this year was the election of three women of color to the Senate, Catherine Cortez Masto in Nevada, Kamala Harris in California and Tammy Duckworth in Illinois. At the same time, the party’s marquee names are far older than the core Democratic coalition.
Sanders is 75, Warren 67 and soon-to-be Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer turns 66 this month. Across the Capitol, Democrats are led by 76-year-old Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California.
In a telephone interview Thursday with The Associated Press, Sanders said Democrats must take a strong stand against the role of corporate interests in politics.
That millions of white working-class people voted for Trump “suggests that the Democratic message of standing up for working people no longer holds much sway among workers in this country,” Sanders said.
Warren is speaking Thursday at an AFL-CIO executive council meeting. Although labor leaders spent millions of dollars backing Clinton, many union members, particularly in Rust Belt states that had been Democratic strongholds, appear to have voted for Trump.
“We should hear the message loud and clear that the American people want Washington to change,” Warren is telling them, according to her prepared remarks. “Working families across this country are deeply frustrated about an economy and a government that doesn’t work for them.”
Democratic woes ripple into their party’s infrastructure, as the Democratic National Committee in Washington struggles. Both the chairwoman who stepped down this summer and the woman who succeeded her in the interim have been dinged by embarrassing emails published by WikiLeaks after what the government believes was a Russian hack of their internal Democratic systems.
Sanders said he would support Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota to become the next chairman of the DNC.
Democrats emphasized their party’s diversity, and some argued that Trump’s singular appeal as a plain-spoken celebrity businessman does not translate into a wholesale voter rejection of Democratic policies.
Jaime Harrison, the South Carolina party chairman, downplayed the idea that Trump’s nationalistic populism should necessarily push the Democratic Party leftward. “That might be overthinking what happened,” he said.
Harrison argued it’s more about finding the right messengers to take the Democratic platform to the pockets of the electorate that have drifted away from the party, naming New York Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand and New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker among others as potential role models for other Democrats.
Yet Walsh warned Democrats not to fall into the same trap as they did eight years ago, after an inspiring 47-year-old first-term senator with a powerful stage presence was elected president.
“Every now and then you get a shining star, and that person takes over the party,” Walsh said. “And during that time you sort of lose the bench.”
———
Associated Press writers Ken Thomas and Bill Barrow contributed to this report.
29 responses to “As Obama leaves office, Democrats look for new leaders”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
I guess they’re shocked that corruption is no longer acceptable.
Democrats have several candidates in the uprisings…
The Democrats did this to themselves when they swindled Bernie Sanders out of the nomination. And Schatz? He’s one of the reasons this happened to the Democrats. 70% of us here in Hawaii voted for Sanders, yet Schatz gave his superdelegate votes to Hillary. He kissed the wrong behind. Whop his jaws.
Even the Star Advertiser endorsed Clinton. Wrong behind too!
Nancy Pussilosi….Elijah Cummings…Maxine Waters…brazille…Wasserman schultz…weiner…they have a lot of leaders.
You forgot “Pocahontas” Warren of New Hampshire who claim Native Indian lineage although not authenticated, another stretching the truth without blinking!
Her cheekbones gave her heritage away. (lol)
After contemplating Keonigohan I came up with a possible list-
Nancy Pulosi -“steer taxpayer funds” Committee chair
Elizabeth Warren, “Pocahontas” – Department of Fish and Wildlife
Elijah Cummings- IRS Oversight Committee
Sanders (Uncle Bernie)- CZAR FOR SOCIAL SECURITY
Wasserman schultz- cHAIR – Whitehouse ETHICS COMMITTEE
Donna Brazille – CO-CHAIR Whitehouse ETHICS COMMITTEE
Maxine Waters- ALT CO-CHAIR Whitehouse ETHICS COMMITTEE
Weiner – STILL TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHERE TO PLACE HIM.
mAYBE IN A FRUIT-OF-THE-LOOM COMMERCIAL ?
lol ^5
Donna Brazile—Communications Director
Anthony Wiener—Outreach and PUBLIC Relations
And Warren and Ried and a few other wackos
hey keoni you forgot anthony weiner..he should be right on da top
as wy hod
if bernie sanders was the democratic candidate….the democrats would have won…..clinton was all about clinton….nothing more,,,nothing less…she was all for herself…..she not giving her concession speach that night proves her selfishness and that she would not have been a good president….in a way, its good she lost and she is history….she lost but the party can recover
Two great choices, an old useless socialist and a crook.
While listening to Hillary’s concession speech I’m pretty sure she was talking about Pocahontas as the women of the Democratic Party to be President. You go listen to that and you can hear Hillary egging on to the fact of a woman President. The Media commented on Hillary’s speech as a good but you could sense her pushing for a women president. Nothing wrong with that but it’s Pocahontas, idk
This Lady is dangerous! She’ll knock down Donald’s southern border walls if erected, we’ll have no Country as illegal migrants will be able to come and go. Amnesty then these legal illegal aliens will vote to change the country. BEWARE of Pocahontas
Wall Street Traders on the Floor BOOED hiLIARy when she appeared & during her speech…WOW!
The Democratic Party should assure all of their supporters will have a legitimate vote in who leads them going forward. A good start would be to canvass people like Hawaii’s own Tim Vandeveer as someone to help lead the party in the right direction.
Keith Ellison should be among leadership going forward.
I think Sanders & Warren would be great new democratic leaders.
Think Again. Or think!
Drain the Swamp!!!!
Dems wouldn’t have anyone left!
Send Big Island Billy to D. C……and his dubious deeds…..he’ll fit right in.
Working class whites want Washington to change. So they vote out the democrats. Go figure. Again, welcome to the early stages of the great American Tribal war.
Why did the Democrats lose? Many answers but here are my thoughts for what it’s worth. Look at the final Red/Blue map of the U.S., then look at where the inner strength of the Blue states were. Mostly in the urban blue areas, not in the overwhelming surrounding rural areas. Meaning: Rural folks were fed up and couldn’t connect with the liberal Big Brother government policies including excessive entitlements and handouts. Enough is enough. Unless the Democratic party realizes this, I have little immediate hope for them. On the bright side, in looking at potential Democratic leaders, one should consider our own Tulsi. Young, vibrant, independent from the norm aging Democrats such as Warren and her ilk.
Let’s see those taxes…..I bet he has business ties to Russia…and that in its self should disqualify him from running for office!!!
Even you can buy stock in Russian companies. And, by the way, the election is over. A wealthy man who filed according to the tax code (that he DID NOT write), won. It’s a little late to disqualify anybody.
The Dems nominated the wrong candidate, if it had been Bernie they would have won. They have no one but themselves to blame for nominating a crook and a liar.
Schatz betrayed Hawaii voters by supporting crooked Hillary against the wishes of his constituents. He should be removed from office along with lazy mazie and Hanabusa. Gabbard appears to be the only honorable politician left among our congressional delegation.
The country voted for change but Hawaii continues to vote for corrupt special interest politicians. Go figure