Trump rejects bipartisan Senate immigration proposal
June 24, 2018 | 76° | Check Traffic

Top News

Trump rejects bipartisan Senate immigration proposal

  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., left, listened as House Homeland Security Border and Maritime Security Subcommittee Chairwoman Rep. Martha McSally, R-Ariz., spoke during a Wednesday news conference, on Capitol Hill in Washington. The news conference was to announce their immigration bill that would impact recipients of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

    “Dreamers,” people brought to the U.S. illegally as children, and other supporters of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, listened, Wednesday, as lawmakers spoke at the Capitol in Washington.

ADVERTISING

The Trump administration rejected a bipartisan Senate proposal to protect young undocumented immigrants from deportation, saying it needed more work.

“We’re pleased that bipartisan members are talking,” President Donald Trump’s congressional liaison Marc Short said today, but added, “I think there’s still a ways to go.”

Short said the administration is concerned about a number of issues including the amount of protection at the U.S.-Mexico border and family preferences for immigrants. White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said, “We still believe we can get there.”

Republican Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, a member of the six-senator negotiating group, said after presenting the proposal at the White House that he hoped it would lead to “a breakthrough” on immigration.

Democrats are demanding protection for undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children, known as “dreamers,” as part of a spending bill to keep the federal government open after current funding ends Jan. 19. Trump decided in September to end the Obama-era initiative on March 5. The Department of Homeland Security counts 690,000 people currently enrolled in the program, known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals.

Second-ranking Senate Democrat Dick Durbin of Illinois released a joint statement by the six Senate negotiators — three Republicans and three Democrats — that said their plan addresses Trump’s insistence on addressing border security, limits to family priority in immigration and an end to a visa lottery to promote diversity.

“We are now working to build support for that deal in Congress,” the senators said.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, told reporters there is “no point” in doing another short-term spending bill unless lawmakers have an agreement on the dreamers.

‘A JOKE’

Second-ranking Senate Republican John Cornyn of Texas, who isn’t part of the group, said he spoke with Trump and the president told him the negotiators need to get wider approval of the plan before moving ahead.

Immigration hardliner Senator Tom Cotton, a Trump ally, called the proposal “a joke,” saying it didn’t go far enough in particular to end immigration family preferences.

Cotton said the plan falls short of Trump’s request for border wall funds. It would limit immigrants with legal residency status from sponsoring adult children for immigration until they become citizens, he said. And, it would reallocate the diversity visas for other uses, said Cotton of Arkansas.

LEGAL RESIDENCE

Cotton said he’s willing to support legal residence for the DACA recipients, with the right to eventually gain U.S. citizenship. He said he agrees with the White House that they should be allowed to sponsor spouses and minor children for legal residence, but not siblings or adult children.

Democrats need to give more in return, Cotton said, including ending the diversity visa program and more border security. The Trump administration has proposed $18 billion over a decade to build a wall.

Third-ranking Senate Republican John Thune of South Dakota said it will take more time to build a consensus.

“We have different groups working on it right now. Hopefully they’ll eventually come together,” Thune said.

Comments (36)
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.