comscore Fact Check: Trump on the economy | Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Uncategorized

Fact Check: Trump on the economy

Honolulu Star-Advertiser logo
Unlimited access to premium stories for as low as $12.95 /mo.
Get It Now
  • ASSOCIATED PRESS

    Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump delivered an economic policy speech to the Detroit Economic Club, today, in Detroit.

WASHINGTON » In his centerpiece speech on the economy, Donald Trump wrongly accused Hillary Clinton of wanting to increase middle-class taxes and blamed America’s crumbling roads and bridges in part on the money spent on refugees, a minuscule expense in comparison with infrastructure.

A look at some of his claims and how they compare with the facts:

TRUMP: “She said she wanted to raise taxes on the middle class.”

THE FACTS: If Clinton said that — and it’s highly debatable — it’s clear she didn’t mean to. Her economic agenda calls for middle-class tax cuts (which are not specified) and she has repeatedly said she would not raise taxes on middle incomes. In a speech in Omaha, Nebraska, last week, she talked about “fairer rules for the middle class” and delivered a line that was difficult to understand, either “we are going to raise taxes on the middle class” or “we aren’t.”

If she said the former, it was obviously a flub. Her policy on middle-class taxes has been consistent — no increases.

TRUMP: “You cannot even start a small business under the tremendous regulatory burden we have today.”

THE FACTS: Trump is exaggerating. There are clear signs that new business formation has slowed, but it hasn’t ground to the halt that he suggests.

Between 2011 and 2013, the most recent years available, the Census Bureau found that the number of companies that employ fewer than four people has increased by 43,232 to 3.58 million.

Nor should anyone assume that regulation alone explains the decline in small business starts. Most entrepreneurs relied on personal savings, home equity and credit cards to finance new companies before the housing bust hurt their ability to access credit, according to a speech by Dennis Lockhart, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Other studies say student loans are inhibiting entrepreneurship among younger Americans.

TRUMP: The country’s infrastructure has suffered “yet we found the money to resettle millions of refugees at taxpayer expense.”

THE FACT: You have to go a long way back to get to “millions” of refugees.

Over the last eight years, the period Trump addresses when pointing to failures of President Barack Obama, the U.S. resettled 530,830 refugees. That includes many from the final year of the Bush administration. So far in the budget year that ends Sept. 30, the U.S. has resettled 59,099 refugees. Last year, 69,933. Over the last 15 years: about 850,000.

The State Department puts the cost of the resettlement program to taxpayers at less than $1.2 billion a year. That’s roughly 0.03 percent of the federal budget, a rounding error according to most experts. That sum would hardly make up for the infrastructure shortfall. The American Society of Civil Engineers said in a report that the government needs to spend $1.4 trillion through 2025 to close the infrastructure funding gap.

TRUMP: “According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, before NAFTA went into effect, there were 285,000 auto workers in Michigan. Today, that number is only 160,000.”

THE FACTS: Trump is playing fast and loose with the stats. The numbers cited in his speech don’t even line up with the footnotes provided by his campaign.

Michigan actually added jobs after the North American Free Trade Agreement began in 1994, when auto plants employed roughly 200,000 workers. Over the next six years, their ranks increased to 231,000. The decline only occurred after the tech bubble burst and U.S. automakers lost market share among U.S. consumers, a decline that prompted a government bailout that caused Michigan auto jobs to start rising again in late 2009.

Many U.S. auto jobs also relocated to other states. Foreign automakers such as Toyota, Honda and Nissan built plants in other states, including Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee and Alabama.

An analysis by the liberal Economic Policy Institute shows that auto job growth in Mexico began to sharply accelerate in 2004. One reason why auto production has increased so much in Mexico is its extensive network of international trade agreements in addition to NAFTA, with German luxury carmaker BMW calling the agreements in 2014 a decisive factor for building its first auto plants in Mexico.

TRUMP on the unemployment rate: “This 5 percent figure is one of the biggest hoaxes in modern American politics.”

THE FACTS: The unemployment rate has its shortcomings but it is not a “hoax.”

The unemployment rate has become controversial since the recession ended because many people have stopped looking for work, and the government doesn’t count those out of work unless they are actively searching for jobs. If an unemployed person gives up on a job hunt, that reduces the unemployment rate without anyone being hired, so it has overstated the improvement in the job market.

Still, a broader measure of unemployment that includes people who have recently stopped looking for jobs has also fallen — from a peak of 17.4 percent in 2010 to 9.7 percent now.

The proportion of Americans working or looking for work is now 62.8 percent, near the lowest level since the 1970s. That’s down from 66 percent before the recession. At least half that decline in the workforce stems from greater retirements, as baby boomers age.

Many of the figures Trump cited in his speech are compiled by the same monthly survey that produces the unemployment figure he considers a hoax.

Associated Press writers Cal Woodward and Alicia A. Caldwell contributed to this report.

Comments (75)

By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the Terms of Service. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our guidelines.

Having trouble with comments? Learn more here.

Leave a Reply

        • Historically, the media made concerted efforts to conduct investigative journalism while news anchors maintained political neutrality. Now our media is in the pockets of politicians and corporations, wearing party affiliation on their sleeves. Consequently, mainstream media is every bit as corrupt as Clinton and the DNC.

        • Are you referring to Fox News, which is about to get dropped with federal papers, as the big momona pervert, Roger, in addition to sexually harassing and propositioning women, was also running a secret vendetta outfit, from the Fox News HQ??

    • Trump does not have a clue what to do. Just because he was a tyrant in business does not mean his experience translates to business. He is an entertainer only.

        • He made much of money and paid for his own personal debt either through bankruptcy or debt financing–and the record has this richly documented.

          Great way to run a country…

        • Great way to destroy a country…..https://www.amazon.com/Clinton-Cash-Foreign-Governments-Businesses/dp/0062369288 This scenario plays out again and again—in Kazakhstan, Colombia, and other places at the “Wild West” fringe of the global economy. Often the people involved are characters of a kind that an American ex-president (not to mention the spouse of a sitting senator, secretary of state, or presidential candidate) should have nothing to do with.

          In this blockbuster exposé, Schweizer reveals

          the mysterious multimillion-dollar Foundation gift from an obscure Indian politician that coincided with Senator Clinton’s reversal on the nuclear non-proliferation treaty;
          how Secretary of State Clinton was involved in allowing the transfer of nearly 50 percent of US domestic uranium output to the Russian government, benefiting large donors to the Clinton Foundation;
          how multimillion-dollar contracts for Haiti disaster relief were awarded to donors and friends of Hillary and Bill;
          how Bill received large payments for speeches from foreign businesses and governments with matters pending before the State Department;
          how the Clintons’ joint visit to Colombia was followed by the grant of lucrative logging rights to a Canadian billionaire, a top Clinton Foundation donor;
          how Bill received $2 million for speeches from the largest shareholder in the Keystone Pipeline project, even as Hillary played a role in approving it.
          Meticulously researched and scrupulously sourced, Clinton Cash raises serious and alarming questions of judgment, of possible indebtedness to an array of foreign interests, and, ultimately, of fitness for high public office.

          Se

      • Absolutely true. Trump’s successes in business are of the entrepreneurial, salesmanship, and reality television type. He has no executive leadership abilities.

        I know many who’ve made big bucks marketing their great ideas, but once the business has been established, they have no clue how to run it, how to manage employees, and they repeatedly make head-scratching decisions.

        Being POTUS is equivalent to being the CEO of the world’s biggest corporation. If Trump could actually get elected, he’d be completely lost, would continue his “psychotic” ways. Oh, and he might start a nuclear war just to impress an aging supermodel.

        We’re all hoping he gets tired of being behind in the polls, quits the race, and makes a new reality show that’ll entertain us all!

    • Boss man, you just jealous. Thursday your candidate going pile up the lies. She going talk stink about Donald because she has no plan. What was Obama doing for the last almost 8 years? Trying to get out of the sand trap with a putter.
      Here’s her accomplishment as a Senator. We will talk about her bad judgement later.

      “Clinton’s self-styled role as economic promoter also showcases an operating style that has come to define the political and money-making machine known to some critics of the former first couple as Clinton Inc. Some of her pet economic projects involved loyal campaign contributors, who also supported the Clinton Foundation, The Post review shows.”
      This after she said she was going to create 200,000 new jobs in upstate New York. Lies, lies and more lies.

    • Per the State Dept it ONLY spends less than $1.2 billion a year on refugees. Oh but it’s okay because it’s ONLY 0.03 percent of the budget. Give me a break.

    • JMV, fully agree with your post. Just sent a few $ to Mr. Trump for a very comprehensive Economic Plan. Making America Great Again is on track and the path is now lighted.

      • Cuban, Bloomberg,Whitman, Forbes, Buffett, Winfrey, Gates. Let’s show these people money is not everything. How can these people support a liar like Crooked Hilliary.

        • Very easily when up against Chump. Besides you spelled her name wrong. It’s Crooked HilLIARy. I’m not sure if that’s how it will be spelled on the ballot, but I’ll be looking for it.

    • this is the typical response to a fact-check by a trump supporter – ignore the facts and focus on something else and then follow up by bashing his opponent, bashing the news source, or cut and pasting some long-winded piece from breitbart or some other conservative news outlet. never a direct response to the facts.

  • Hillary’s speech in Omaha she said she was going to raise taxes for the middle class and her stupid supporters cheered for that. They must be smoking weed before her speeches for them to cheer that on but as normal the media didn’t make issue on that.

      • Let’s look at this objectively.

        Hillary’s poor health has been known for a while. In acting like this was created from whole cloth, a normally responsible Dave Weigel takes a side trip into deception. Hillary has a history of falling on her fat butt. In 2009, she fell and broke her elbow. In 2011, she fell while boarding an aircraft and not under sniper fire. In 2012, she fell at home and bounced off the floor and furniture hard enough to get a blood clot. Last year, I posted on this subject:

        We know that Hillary Clinton has suffered from fainting spells since at least 2005. In that year she passed out, presumably sober, while giving a speech. In 2012, she passed out yet again and suffered a concussion. Radar Online has reported that sources close to Hillary Clinton say she has suffered minor strokes and may have multiple sclerosis. The book on Hillary by Ed Klein says that she suffers from depression and migraines.
        In Hillary Clinton’s emails we have lots of direct evidence that she is physically not up to the job of being president.

  • A good friend retired from GM in Detroit a couple of years ago and moved here to Waipahu. We golf every week and he has confirmed that his fellow union members are fully employed and doing fine.

  • Trump nailed it. Good job. Last week Crooked Hillary was ahead in the polls by double digits, this week, single digits, next week, Trump pulls even.
    I smell burning wires from blown fuses and circuit breakers. Zzzzzzzzt. Short circuit.
    Fact check is a joke. The Clinton campaign has to get back in the gutter again. There is no high road for them. It’s over for the Democrats.
    FINI.

    • Like he nailed the convention, which you so highly touted?? Now pundits, and R pundits. to be clear, are calling it one of the worse performances in recent memory and has the dismal numbers to match. Stick to Pokemon and feeding your mom….

    • Here in lies your dillema; you keep trying to make an argument that is a moot point. Yes, Crooked HilLIARy (you spelled her name wrong again) may be a liar (like the old joke. How do you know a politician is lying? When their mouth is moving) but that is not a reason to vote FOR Chump. I keep waiting for him to give you something ,anything to go on. A wall is not an immigration policy. I thought maybe we would see an economic policy from this article. Still nothing. You’ve got your work cut out for you with no help from The Donald.

  • Trump claimed that he will repeal the “death tax,” saying that “American workers…should not be taxed again at death.” This is a bogus issue that fires up the poorly educated base, but it is really another attempt to tilt the benefits of the tax code even more in favor of the 1%. A married couple can shield up to $10.9M from the current estate tax. How many “workers” have estates exceeding $10.9M? It is estimated that full repeal would benefit only 5,400 families in 2016, but those families’ average savings would be $3M. For Trump and the members of his economic advisory panels, the benefits would be much greater. Republican voters have good reason to be angry at the people they’ve sent to Washington, and this proposal is typical of the way they’ve been deceived. The Republican party’s greatest success has been getting low-information voters to vote against their best interests, in favor of policies that benefit the super rich.

    • Presently you are correct. The tax code may change.
      “Even though it likely won’t move the needle on the economy, 75% of voters say they’re opposed to a death tax thus scrapping it may have a psychological benefit, “People like to keep more money, pass less taxes”

  • Fact check.

    Despite the significant decrease in the official U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) unemployment rate, the real unemployment rate is over double that at 12.6%. This number reflects the government’s “U-6” report, which accounts for the full unemployment picture including those “marginally attached to the labor force,” plus those “employed part time for economic reasons.”

  • Breaking News– 50 very senior Republican security officials come out against Trump in a signed published letter:

    Fifty of the nation’s most senior Republican national security officials, many of them former top aides or cabinet members for President George W. Bush, have signed a letter declaring that Donald J. Trump “lacks the character, values and experience” to be president and “would put at risk our country’s national security and well-being.”

    Mr. Trump, the officials warn, “would be the most reckless president in American history.”

    The letter says Mr. Trump would weaken the United States’ moral authority and questions his knowledge of and belief in the Constitution. It says he has “demonstrated repeatedly that he has little understanding” of the nation’s “vital national interests, its complex diplomatic challenges, its indispensable alliances and the democratic values” on which American policy should be based. And it laments that “Mr. Trump has shown no interest in educating himself.”

    “None of us will vote for Donald Trump,” the letter states, though it notes later that many Americans “have doubts about Hillary Clinton, as do many of us.”

    Among the most prominent signatories are Michael V. Hayden, a former director of both the C.I.A. and the National Security Agency; John D. Negroponte, who served as the first director of national intelligence and then deputy secretary of state; and Robert B. Zoellick, another former deputy secretary of state, United States trade representive and, until 2012, president of the World Bank. Two former secretaries of homeland security, Tom Ridge and Michael Chertoff, also signed, as did Eric S. Edelman, who served as Vice President Dick Cheney’s national security adviser and as a top aide to Robert M. Gates when he was secretary of defense.

    Document: A Letter From G.O.P. National Security Officials Opposing Donald Trump
    Robert Blackwill and James Jeffrey, two key strategists in Mr. Bush’s National Security Council, and William H. Taft IV, a former deputy secretary of defense and ambassador to NATO, also signed.

    The letter underscores the continuing rupture in the Republican Party, but particularly within its national security establishment. Many of those signing it had declined to add their names to a similar open letter released in March. But a number said in recent interviews that they changed their minds once they heard Mr. Trump invite Russia to hack into Mrs. Clinton’s email server — a sarcastic remark, he said later — and say that he would check to see how much NATO members contributed to the alliance before sending forces to help stave off a Russian attack.

    Yet the signatories are unlikely to impress Mr. Trump or the largely lesser-known foreign policy team he has assembled around him: He has said throughout his campaign that he intends to upend Republican foreign policy orthodoxy on everything from trade to Russia. And many of the aides who signed the letter were active in developing the plan to invade Iraq or managing its aftermath, which Mr. Trump has described as a “disaster.”

    So, tell me again, Les, Kuro, Sarge, Romin, Keoni, Thos, Winston et al….how is he the “security president?????”

    Chirp chirp….crickets again!

    • It’s the establishment that is afraid their game is up if Mr Trump becomes President. One of the Bush clan is backing Trump…What do the 50 very senior security republicans have to say about HiLIARy’s classified emails? Here is another breaking news story…Clinton’s private server held emails about nuclear ‘spy’ executed in Iran: Aides discussed scientist ‘friend’ and his decision to return home after defecting to the U.S. for $5m
      Shahram Amiri was in the U.S. while Hillary was Secretary of State
      Believed to have handed over secrets about Tehran’s nuclear program
      He was hanged for ‘revealing secrets to the enemy’ on Sunday
      Hillary stressed he was here at his ‘own free will’ at the time
      But he maintained he’d been kidnapped by American intelligence agents
      A diplomat and one of Clinton’s top advisers then sent emails about him
      One stated it was ‘diplomatic, psychological issue’, but not a legal one

      Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3728222/Hillary-Clinton-discussed-executed-Iranian-nuclear-scientist-advisers-private-server-referring-friend.html#ixzz4GnGqc8EZ
      Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    • Ikefromeli,
      This assertation is yet another one of your latest futile dispersions. The same 50 senior advisors the Obama administration have cast aspersions upon aspersions? 50 of the most abject failures? Since when do you or Trump think this is a problem. This is a testament to the qualities of Trump to be the greatest POTUS in American History. He will not make the same mistakes that the 50, Crooked Hillary and Obama did.

      • Not my dispersion–I am neither of the collected group nor an author. Again, these are the ,Sor prominent security experts on the right. Trump has no one close in experience or history of these complicated subjects……name one?

  • So, what experts say from both the R and L, on Trumps economic speech?

    Economists and Wall Street executives portrayed Donald Trump’s economic platform as a kind of Frankenstein’s monster, stitching together old ideas from the left and right.The plan, which many said defies ideological classification, includes a heavy dose of trickle-down tax cuts mixed with old-fashioned protectionism, reform-conservative social policy and a deregulation plan that should make Wall Street rejoice.

    The question is whether this very unusual mixture of policies rolled out in Detroit on Monday will prove captivating enough to any of Trump’s constituencies to stall his recent slide in the polls and recapture the momentum that drove him against all odds to the Republican nomination.

    But the initial reaction from economists, financial services executives and Republican analysts was less than positive as critics ripped the plan for lacking specifics while relying on broad generalizations to attack free-trade deals.
    “This economic plan appears to be the good, the bad and in some cases the ugly,” said Lanhee Chen, a fellow at the Hoover Institution who was a top policy aide to Mitt Romney in 2012.

    On Wall Street, analysts also criticized the speech as vague and reliant on questionable statistics. “My general response is that one speech does not make an economic plan and most of what he relied on was hyperbole,” said David Kotok, chief investment officer at Cumberland Advisors. “Let him do a dozen more of these and flesh out the specifics and then you could actually begin to analyze things.”

    One area where Trump provided some specifics was on tax cuts for both individuals and corporations. The GOP nominee likely slashed the original cost of his $10 trillion tax plan by junking his proposed rates of 0, 10, 20 and 25 percent and replacing them with House Speaker Paul Ryan’s proposed rates of 12, 25 and 33 percent. He left intact his proposal to cut the top corporate rate from 35 percent to 15 percent.

    Even with the slightly higher individual rates, the tax plan will likely produce a hefty price tag with benefits tilted toward those earning the highest incomes. Trump added a proposal to allow families to deduct the cost of child-care from their taxes, an idea that, according to Trump adviser Stephen Moore, says could cost $20 billion per year and largely benefit wealthy families, rather than low-income earners who spend more of their money on child care but pay little in federal taxes.

    These tax proposals leave Trump open to attacks from Hillary Clinton’s campaign that his plans are more of the same trickle-down approach that Democrats say has exacerbated economic inequality.

    “The child care deduction is a horrible idea,” said Chen. “If they are going to be in general election mode and try to appeal to independents and women voters, the proposal should be tailored to serve those voters and this policy isn’t. I want to be sympathetic but they wound up in the wrong place.”

    In short, utter blunder, and does not provide a cohesive plan that is at once lucid while providing a sufficent amount of details. In lieu, we got a bunch of idioms, axiomatic R talking points and rehashed ideas……

    Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/trump-economy-226799#ixzz4Gn5MUYUm

    • The Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) Annual Meeting – hosted by former US President Bill Clinton and Clinton Foundation Vice Chair Chelsea Clinton – takes place this week in New York; bringing together heads of state, business leaders, scholars and directors of non-governmental organisations to discuss global social issues and possible solutions. On Monday, 28 September, Barclays Executive Chairman John McFarlane participated in two CGI events.
      They got Hillary in their pockets.

      • Les, if you want, and you need it, I can hook you up with them: they got a couple spots doing lunch time catering or do you prefer afterhours janitorial stuff? Probably, the night gig huh–so you can rife through the Clintons stuff….

  • Michele Obama’s personal staff:

    One.. $192,200 – Sher, Susan (Chief Of Staff)

    Two.. $160,000 – Frye, Jocelyn C. (Director of Policy And Projects For The First Lady)

    Three..$133,000 – Rogers, Desiree G. (White House Social Secretary for Mrs. Obama)

    Four.. $122,000 – Johnston, Camille Y. (Director of Communications for the First Lady)

    Five.. $120,000 – Winter, Melissa (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

    Six…. $110,000 Medina , David S. (Deputy Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

    Seven.. $104,000 – Lilyveld, Catherine M. (Director and Press Secretary to the First Lady)

    Eight.. $95,000 – Starkey, Frances M. (Director of Scheduling and Advance for the First Lady)

    Nine.. $90,000 – Sanders, Trooper (Deputy Director of Policy and Project for the First Lady)

    Ten.. $85,000 – Burnough, Erinn (Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)

    Eleven.. $84,000 – Reinstein, Joseph B.(Deputy Director and Deputy Social Secretary)

    Twelve.. $82,000 – Goodman, Jennifer R. (Deputy Director of Scheduling and Events Coordinator For The First Lady)

    Thirteen.. $80,000 Fitz, Alan O.(Deputy Director of Advance and Trip Director for the First Lady)

    Fourteen.. $77,500 – Lewis, Dana M. (Special Assistant and Personal Aide to the First Lady)

    Fifteen.. $72,500 – Mustaphi, Semonti M. (Associate Director and Deputy Press Secretary To The First Lady)

    Sixteen.. $70,000 – Jarvis, Kristen E. (Special Assistant for Scheduling and Traveling Aide To The First Lady)

    Seventeen.. $65,000 – Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (Associate Director of Correspondence For The First Lady)

    Eighteen.. $63,000 – Tubman, Samantha a (Deputy Associate Director, Social Office)

    Nineteen.. $60,000 – Boswell, Joseph J. (Executive Assistant to the Chief Of Staff to the First Lady)

    Twenty.. $56,000 – Armbruster, Sally M. (Staff Assistant to the Social Secretary)

    Twenty-One.. $55,000 – Bookey, Natalie (Staff Assistant)

    Twenty-Two.. $55,000 – Jackson, Deilia A. (Deputy Associate Director of Correspondence for the First Lady)

    Total $2,075,200 in annual salaries – all for someone we did not vote for and apparently have no control over.

    5 are Muslim and 13 are African-American

    There has NEVER been anyone in the White House at any time who has created such an army of staffers whose sole duties are the facilitation of the

    First Lady’s social life.

    This does not include makeup artist Ingrid Grimes-Miles, 49, and “First Hairstylist” Johnny Wright, 31, both of whom traveled aboard Air Force One on all ALL Trips, Europe included.

    As of 11/15.2015 the Obama Family has spent over 1.3 Billion dollars on personal family trips.

    They were personal not political or Government related.

    • What do their race or religion have to do with anything? The certain calling card of a small minded racist and bigot. I told you before, no need to hide it, tell everyone how you feel, the truth will set you free…..cmon, tell us, that way you don’t have to hide the pillow case anymore.

    • Really? Michelle Obama staff is a reason to vote for Trump? Oh wait I see, the reason is that there are 5 Muslims and 13 African Americans. In the words of Mccarthy Welch exchange..” have you no sense of decency? ” I get it now lespark. Disgusting.

      • Yes, Les is beyond the pale. Besides,,being unemployed, uneducated, unread, without a partner and friends, he is also likes to dabble in racism and bigotry. All around heinous person.

        • Good job Les. You got the over educated low class all riled up and reverting to name calling. Who would have thunk it. “Make America Great Again” Great speech by Donald today. Where’s the pant suit today. Doctor’s appointment.

        • Total Personal Staff members for other first ladies paid by you the taxpayers:

          Mamie Eisenhower: One — paid for personally out of President’s salary.
          Jackie Kennedy: One
          Rosaline Carter: One
          Barbara Bush: One
          Hilary Clinton: Three
          Laura Bush: One
          Michele Obama: Twenty-two
          Ike, why do you bring race and bigotry into everything?
          Anyway, FYI in comparison to the other First Ladies.
          Michelle is a phony.

        • Ike, ok, I see the error. I apologize. But I still don’t like vomit Hillary. She’s going down.

    • Please refer to Snopes factcheck of this online rumor, which rates it false and cites AP’s fact check:

      ” “A look at some first ladies and their staff sizes:

      Laura Bush: Between 24 and 26 by end of President George W. Bush’s term in 2009, according to Anita McBride, Mrs. Bush’s chief of staff.

      Lady Bird Johnson, whose signature issue was beautifying roadways, had a staff of 30, said Stacy A. Cordery, a history professor at Montmouth [sic] College in Illinois who studies first ladies.

      Betty Ford had almost the same number.

      Jacqueline Kennedy, who made renovating the White House her cause, had about 40 people on staff, Cordery said.”

  • In addition to 50 senior security leaders in R party who have formally disavowed Trump– now Ronald Regans Political Director and an ambassador in his administration has repudiated Trump.

    A former political director for late President Ronald Reagan and longtime Republican operative has come out in support of Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, saying she “comes closer to Republican views” than the party’s nominee, Donald Trump.

    Frank Lavin, who has served in “every Republican administration over the past 40 years,” wrote an op-ed for CNN Monday arguing that while it’s not entirely clear Mrs. Clinton deserves to win the White House, “it is thunderingly clear that Donald Trump deserves to lose.”
    “From this premise, I will do something that I have not done in 40 years of voting: I will vote for the Democratic nominee for president,” he wrote. “The depressing truth of the Republican nominee is that Donald Trump talks a great game but he is the emperor who wears no clothes.

    “Trump falls short in terms of the character and behavior needed to perform as president,” he continued. “This defect is crippling and ensures he would fail in office. Trump is a bigot, a bully, and devoid of grace or magnanimity. His thin-skinned belligerence toward every challenge, rebuke or criticism would promise the nation a series of a high-voltage quarrels. His casual dishonesty, his policy laziness, and his lack of self-awareness would mean four years of a careening pin-ball journey that would ricochet from missteps to crisis to misunderstandings to clarifications to retractions.”

    • Ike? Using words like “Bigot and Bully” really shows your frustration. And Lespark outstanding job on the stats. Thanks for putting Ike in his place.lol……..careful though his fellow colleagues of “frustration” are also peering through the cracks,ready to unleash! Just a friendly heads up! Haaaaaaaaaa!

        • What next, are you going to report about how Bush took almost a thousand days of documented vacation days while fighting several wars??? Oh, btw, Obama has taken less rhan half that number by a very large margin.

        • Something that is entirely beyond your comprehension and reach. Sarge we are in different zip codes in more ways than one….

  • AP as usual,running Damage Control again. Such a huge news agency and they still can’t get it right. They should at least get their first “Fact Checks right? Right? WRONG! Huh? Say what!
    First of all Hillary Did say that she was going to raise taxes for the middle class, it was on the Tele guys!”If Clinton said that”. There’s NO “IF’S” APP. People were scratching their heads when they heard that. That’s what she said! The MSM is so quick to point out when Donald is wrong,but when Hillary is WRONG ? Silence!
    So what now? Is she going to blame it on being “Short Circuited”? lol.

    How about those unemployment Numbers they tout? Did they(AP) forget to tell you that most of those So Called Jobs are Part Time and Temporary Jobs? didn’t see that there…. I wonder why?
    Maybe somebody better do a “Fact Check” on AP

  • The parents of two of the four Americans who died in the Benghazi attack in 2012 filed a lawsuit Monday against Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, alleging her “reckless handling” of classified information contributed to their deaths.

  • The Clinton Global Initiative (CGI) Annual Meeting – hosted by former US President Bill Clinton and Clinton Foundation Vice Chair Chelsea Clinton – takes place this week in New York; bringing together heads of state, business leaders, scholars and directors of non-governmental organisations to discuss global social issues and possible solutions. On Monday, 28 September, Barclays Executive Chairman John McFarlane participated in two CGI events.

    Big banks and others have Clinton in their pockets. Come on America! Make America Great Again.

Click here to see our full coverage of the coronavirus outbreak. Submit your coronavirus news tip.

Be the first to know
Get web push notifications from Star-Advertiser when the next breaking story happens — it's FREE! You just need a supported web browser.
Subscribe for this feature

Scroll Up