Quantcast

Thursday, July 31, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 0 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Civil-union letter splits firms

By Gene Park

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 02:57 a.m. HST, Jul 07, 2010


When it comes to an issue as divisive as civil unions, some Hawaii companies have decided it is best to mind their own business.

"Because it's such an emotional issue, I think it's best not to have your company involved," said Keith Vieira, senior vice president of operations for Starwood Hotels & Resorts in Hawaii and French Polynesia.

Vieira is a member of the Hawaii Business Roundtable. The Roundtable, which includes executives from the state's largest companies, sent a letter June 4 to Gov. Linda Lingle urging her to veto a civil unions bill. The bill, House Bill 444, would give couples in a civil union the same rights as married couples.

Five of the companies in the Roundtable, Starwood included, issued statements yesterday disassociating themselves from the veto letter.

"While we are active members of the Business Roundtable and believe it to be a beneficial organization for the people of Hawaii, we do not agree with every decision that the Roundtable makes," said Time Warner Cable Inc. in a statement through the Washington, D.C.-based Human Rights Campaign. Nate Smith, president of Time Warner subsidiary Oceanic Cablevision Inc., sits on the Roundtable's executive committee.

"The letter to Gov. Lingle urging her not to support House Bill 444 is one such instance."

The other companies are: Aon Corp., Marsh & McLennan Cos. Inc., Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide Inc. and Marriott International Inc. Only Aon Corp. gave explicit support of civil unions, but all stressed distancing themselves from any calls for a veto.

In a letter to civil union supporters yesterday, Vieira called on Roundtable Executive Director Gary K. Kai to "remove Starwood and myself personally from any communication that supports the veto of this bill."

Vieira wrote that "while there are concerns on the wording of the legislation, we will not support a veto of this bill."

The letter was addressed to Carolyn Martinez Golojuch, president of Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians and Gays Oahu; Donald Bentz, treasurer of Equality Hawaii; and attorney Jo-Ann Adams. In response to the letter, Adams said the Roundtable "should be completely discounted."

"In their zeal to throw a monkey wrench into the governor's orderly decision-making process, the letter, their comments and the ensuing press coverage have tarnished the reputation of a group which includes some of the nation's finest and most enlightened companies," Adams said.

Officials at the Hawaii Business Roundtable, including Kai, have not returned calls for comment on the issue or the conflicting statements from some of its membership.

Kai's June 4 letter did not take a position on civil unions. It took issue with the language of the bill, including its effective date of Jan. 1, 2010, and the potential for more questions to arise as the legislation is implemented.

When Human Rights Campaign officials saw Kai's letter, they were puzzled because they knew a number of companies represented in the organization have pushed for equality in the workplace.

"We then reached out to them to help understand the situation better," said HRC spokesman Michael Cole in a phone interview from Washington, D.C. "What we heard was that a number of companies wanted nothing to do with this statement against the civil unions bill."

Several local business organizations -- Chamber of Commerce of Hawaii, Latin Business Hawaii, Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Hawaii and Smart Business Hawaii -- said yesterday they have not taken a stance on civil unions and do not plan to.

"It's a very emotional issue, and we kind of like to let companies make their own decisions on that," said Hawaii Chamber President Jim Tollefson.

Tollefson said that although his group has not taken a stance, it has done research on the bill's possible impact. The state chamber spoke with chambers in other states that do allow civil unions. The verdict: "From what we can determine, and talking with the Hawaii Employers Council, we think there's going to be minimal impact on business."

Taking a stand on an issue like civil unions can be risky, said Marie Villa, president of Latin Business Hawaii, a Hispanic business group made up of 85 local companies.

"I think with taking a stand, you don't want to cut your nose to spite your face," said Villa, who also runs Hispanic Hawaii News. "It's like being bipartisan. It's smart not to sway one way or the other, because it's going to affect people whether it goes through or not, in many different ways."

The Chinese Chamber of Commerce of Hawaii also has not taken a stance, said Executive Vice President Wen Chung Lin.

When it comes to social issues, there will never be a consensus, particularly among businesses, said state Republican Sen. Sam Slom, also president of small-business group Smart Business Hawaii.

Slom voted against HB 444 and has been a vocal opponent of civil unions in his capacity as a public official. He said his preference is to remove the government from marriages, not just same-sex civil unions.

But the private sector has moved toward more progressive attitudes in the workplace, something Slom acknowledged yesterday.

In 2003, 200 of the Fortune 500 companies -- or 40 percent -- offered domestic partner benefits to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees, according to the Human Rights Campaign. That number grew to 293, or 59 percent, by 2009.

"It's similar to how we saw over the past few years, every business has gone green now," Slom said. "They don't want to appear anti-environmental. Most of it is marketing and PR. The rest of it is just common sense."

The focus, Slom said, is on the bottom line, including being able to hire the best possible employees from the available talent pool regardless of who they are. It also means not alienating your customers.

"Part of acting smarter is that you don't act or react to everything that the Legislature does or doesn't do, but you do have to stay on message and stay focused," Slom said. "Instead, now you have guys trying to cover their rears, trying to speak out of both sides of their mouth."

RELATED STORIES

Civil unions: The road ahead

Couple fights for rights in public, but lives an ordinary private life

'Today is an amazing day'

Both sides see same-sex marriage in future

Tears and cheers as Abercrombie signs bill

Bill on civil unions to be signed today

Tourism industry split over civil unions' effects

Civil unions to 'bring more people' here

Governor to sign civil unions bill into law next week

'Historic' bill OK'd by Senate

Composure prevails in debate over civil unions

Civil unions bill wins final approval; awaits governor's signature

Civil unions approval expected today

Civil unions on the brink of approval

Panel passes civil unions bill

With bill, Illinois clears civil unions

Civil unions bill moves on

Senate panel OKs SB 232

Testimony by young adults raises issues of religion and marriage

Civil unions bill advances out of Senate committee

Lawsuits seek federal benefits for gays

Legislative numbers favor civil unions law

Civil unions bill fails to shift voters

Isle pair upbeat on gay marriage

Debate keys on civil unions

Ruling energizes civil-union advocates

Civil union opponents regroup after suit filed

Couples sue state over civil unions

Abercrombie stresses support for civil unions measure

Hannemann would veto civil unions

Civil unions veto backlash begins

Judge strikes at gay-union ban

Lingle vetoes civil-unions bill

Emotions run high through crowds

Consequences of HB 444 will be felt at the ballot box

The governor's full civil-unions veto statement

Governor will announce civil unions decision at 3 p.m.

Veto override session dead

Bankoh opposes civil-union bill veto

Civil union supporters rally

Civil unions' fate unknown

Civil-union letter splits firms

Rights group considers boycott involving HB 444

Business Roundtable urges civil union veto

Civil union pairs might face taxes

ON THE WEB






 Print   Email   Comment | View 0 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(0)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions


IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates
Blogs
Political Radar
Maximum Ige

Political Radar
Maximum Abercrombie

Political Radar
-1.8%

Political Radar
`Trust’

Warrior Beat
Pre-camp notes

The Green Leaf
Marine debris art

Political Radar
`Toss up’