Quantcast
  

Tuesday, May 21, 2013         

 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Apple's net income soars as iPhone mania grows

By Peter Svensson

Associated Press

POSTED:

associated press / april 28, 2011@Caption1:Sales of the iPhone leaped to 35 million in the January-to-March quarter, accounted for 58 percent of Apple's revenue and helped the technology giant nearly double its net income from a year ago.

NEW YORK » Apple Inc., the world's most valuable company, trumped skeptics once again by reporting blowout iPhone sales.

Apple says it sold 35 million iPhones in the January-to-March quarter, almost twice as many as it sold a year ago and above analyst expectations.

Apple's stock was down 2 percent at the close of regular trading, as investors believed phone companies had reined in iPhone sales. In extended trading the stock rallied $40.02, or 7.1 percent, to $600.30.

"They're delivering the goods much stronger than even the biggest bulls would have thought," said Brian White, an analyst with Topeka Capital Markets. "It's Apple fever at its finest."

Net income in the company's fiscal second quarter was $11.6 billion, or $12.30 per share. That was nearly double the net income of $6 billion, or $6.40 per share, a year ago.

Analysts polled by FactSet were expecting earnings of $10.07 per share for the latest quarter, Apple's fiscal second.

Revenue was $39.2 billion, up 59 percent from a year ago. Analysts were expecting $37 billion.

IPad sales came in below analyst expectations, at 11.8 million units. But that was still 2.5 times as many as it sold in the same quarter a year ago. Apple launched a new iPad model in the quarter, and supplies are still tight. White believes short supplies of the new high-resolution screen are to blame.

Mac sales were also slightly below expectations, at 4 million. That was up 7 percent from last year. Meanwhile, the overall PC market grew about 2 percent.

Windows PC makers are now hoping Windows 8 will give them a better chance at competing with Apple, both in PCs and tablets. Intel CEO Paul Otellini last week said he believes PCs and tablets will merge into one light device with a keyboard and a touch-sensitive screen.

Apple CEO Tim Cook dismissed that idea on a conference call with analysts Tuesday. Tablets and PCs work best as separate devices, playing to their own strengths, he said.

"You can converge a toaster and a refrigerator, but those things are probably not going to be pleasing to the user," he said.

Cook also dismissed concerns that phone companies aren't satisfied subsidizing each new iPhone by hundreds of dollars, and are trying to curb iPhone upgrades by their subscribers. AT&T Inc.'s Tuesday morning earnings report provided signs that the company is doing just that.

"IPhone is the best smartphone on the planet to entice the customer who is currently using a traditional mobile phone to upgrade to a smartphone." Cook said. "There's a win-win-win there."

Analyst Abhey Lamba at Mizuho Securities agreed, saying he doesn't expect phone companies to change their subsidies any time soon.

"IPhone is selling well because consumers want it, not because carriers are pushing it," he said.

IPhone sales accounted for 58 percent of Apple's revenue, more than ever. Three years ago the figure was 27 percent.

Keeping with the trend over the last year, Asia, and in particular China, accounted for much of the revenue growth. Sales in "Greater China," which includes Hong Kong and Taiwan, were triple those of a year ago and accounted for 20 percent of Apple's revenue.

For the third fiscal quarter, ending in June, Apple is expecting earnings of $8.68 per share and revenue of $34 billion. Both figures are well below analyst expectations, but that's usually the case with Apple's forecasts. The company is famous for low-balling its predictions.

During the quarter, Apple announced that it would start paying a dividend this summer. It has ample cash to pay for one: The company's hoard grew to $110 billion during the quarter. However, the company doesn't look at the whole pile when it decides how much it can pay out in dividends. Instead, it only looks at the $63 billion it has in U.S. accounts. Like other U.S. multinationals, it doesn't want to bring back overseas earnings and have them taxed again at the U.S. corporate tax rate of 35 percent.

Apple's market capitalization is $559 billion, including the rally in extended trading. The world's second most valuable company, Exxon Mobil Corp., is worth $407 billion.






 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
999
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have read and agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. Any violations of these terms may result in account suspension or deactivation. Please keep your comments civil and in good taste. To report a comment, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
manakuke wrote:
A very powerful cellular telephone!
on April 25,2012 | 04:32AM
onevoice82 wrote:
Now there is a debate topic.....how does a US corporation (Apple), shelter 47 BILLION dollars from being taxed by leaving it in foreign countries?
on April 25,2012 | 05:31AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Apple gets away with portraying itself as a cool American company with American values. But it notorious for moving money offshore. It also employs what we would consider near slave labor in China to build the devices. So many people think that buying an iPhone or iPad makes you cool or hip or trendy. It doesn't. It just means one more person whu got snookered into the marketing hype and has a new toy built on the suffering of other people.
on April 25,2012 | 09:53AM
onevoice82 wrote:
I see your points, but I do love my iphone and it is a superior product to the android and other copy cat phones.
on April 25,2012 | 10:31AM
ManoaHi wrote:
You are so wrong. The problem about "near slave labor in China" to build the Apple devices, it is not just Apple, they just investigated it themselves and admitted to it. Foxconn is the manufacturer, and they make products for (in addition to Apple): Acer, Amazon, Cisco, Dell, HP, Intel, Microsoft, Motorola Mobility, Nintendo, Nokia, Samsung Electronics, Sony, Toshiba, Vizio and many others. Apple is the only one that is trying to make it better, first by publicizing it, then meeting with Foxconn. What are the other makers doing? So, far most are waiting to see what comes of Apple's investigation. Why are you singling out Apple? So next time you buy an electronic device, check if is made in China. Odds are very high that it came from Foxconn. So, even if you have a "dumb" phone, it was probably made at Foxconn. So, hip or cool has nothing to do with it. Most things we buy today were probably made under "near slave labor" somewhere. Yes, it occurs in the United States as well. Rent or buy "Food Inc." you will see it on our shores. Another thing is that as bad (by American standards) as Foxconn is concerned people there are still getting better conditions than many other factories and other forms of labor. Have you seen how others are treated? Did you see where our used electronics go? That is so bad, children living in a toxic waste site. Most chemicals including lead and some heavy metals are a huge part of electronics and that is all, not just Apple. Actually, Apple and Dell are a little better in the manufacturing and disposal than most others.
on April 25,2012 | 03:21PM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
So, hip or cool has nothing to do with it. Most things we buy today were probably made under "near slave labor" somewhere.

That's my point. Thanks for your support.


on April 25,2012 | 06:13PM
ManoaHi wrote:
"Revenue was $39.2 billion" do you understand what "revenue" means? Every single cost behind that lowers that number, and most definitely less than half. They still have to pay Foxconn for the iDevices. I used to work overseas and you know what? I still had to pay US taxes. Apple does not get exempt from paying U.S. taxes by holding that money overseas. I used to work in the Investment Banking industry, and our client firms were often in tax havens, but the US has gone and taxed them anyway and they returned to the US. So holding profits (revenue - expenses) overseas does not prevent taxation by the US. No debate topic.
on April 25,2012 | 03:31PM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Google is your friend. You need to acquire some background knowledge before posting. Look it up.
on April 25,2012 | 06:16PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates