Saturday, July 26, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Judge urges mediation in Hostess-union dispute

The talks could lead to saving more than 18,000 jobs around the country

Los Angeles Times


Twinkies may live on after all.

Bankrupt Hostess Brands Inc. and its striking union agreed to enter into mediation to try to resolve their differences, putting the baking company's planned liquidation on hold for now.

At a U.S. Bankruptcy Court hearing Monday in White Plains, N.Y., the 82-year-old company sought permission to start shutting down its business. Instead, Judge Robert Drain urged Hostess and the Bakery, Confectionery, Tobacco Workers and Grain Millers International Union to consider mediation.

Both sides agreed to try to work through the conflict, which could preserve more than 18,000 jobs.

Altogether, Hostess has 565 distribution centers around the country, as well as 33 bakeries and 570 bakery outlets.

Mediation hearings will begin today, but the original hearing to consider the shutdown plan was adjourned until Wednesday morning, just in case reconciliation talks don't work out. Production "remains shut down," according to the Irving, Texas, company.

But the scales are out of balance, with the union at a deep disadvantage, said Gene Grabowski, a Washington crisis communications expert at consulting firm Levick.

If discussions fail, Hostess probably will sell itself at a loss and wash its hands of the situation, Levick said. Buyers — potentially major food companies such as ConAgra Foods Inc., Kraft Foods Inc. or Nestle — then probably would absorb the brands into their operations without hiring former Hostess workers.

"It's hard to see what they could accomplish at this point," Grabowski said. "It looks like Hostess management is holding more cards right now than labor. This is really the last hope for employees to save their jobs."

Hostess said Friday that it would go out of business after union members went on strike. Workers accused the company of slashing benefits and wages while rewarding managers with substantial pay raises.

A suite of suitors is already preparing to vie for control of Hostess' brands in case new negotiations fall through.

"There's a whole host of huge food companies out there that have the financial wherewithal to take over Twinkies and make money off of it," said Anthony Michael Sabino, a business professor at St. John's University in New York. "There could be very spirited bidding."

In Bankruptcy Court, investment fund Hurst Capital in Sarasota, Fla., filed a letter of intent to complete what it said was a multimillion-dollar offer to buy Hostess' assets, including intellectual property, computer software and office supplies.

"Hostess has, over the last 80 years, created several of the most recognizable and powerful brands in the United States," said Austin Hurst, the company's managing general partner. "They have undeniable value and, when combined with the other existing assets of the company, represent a compelling acquisition opportunity."

Flowers Foods Inc., the Thomasville, Ga., parent of the Nature's Own brand, said Monday that it has extended its loan agreements, allowing it to access more funds for "acquisition financing" and "expansion goals," among other purposes. To analysts the move signaled that the Georgia baking company was interested in picking up Hostess.

And private equity firm Sun Capital Partners Inc. in Boca Raton, Fla., told Fortune magazine that it hoped to buy the company using a more union-friendly deal. Reports over the weekend also named Grupo Bimbo, the Mexican company that owns Sara Lee and Entenmann's, as a possible bidder.

Hostess spokesman Lance Ignon confirmed that the company has "had interest from buyers for specific assets," but refused to name the interested parties.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
mcc wrote:
The people who run the company are going to bust the union or take the money and run. Win win for the ones on top.
on November 20,2012 | 12:36PM
saywhatyouthink wrote:
Wake up and smell the coffee unions...... You try to hurt the employer by striking, now no more job! Got what you deserved in a tough economy. I can't believe any union would strike now when the country has yet to recover from the last recession. Not very smart people running these unions I guess. They're learning this lesson the hard way.
on November 20,2012 | 04:35PM
soundofreason wrote:
Agreed. Let 'em burn. Just flip over to other story where GM just opened up another factory overseas with our bailout money. Cool. So, why do you think they chose overseas? Thaaaaaaaaaat's right! Our unions!!.
on November 21,2012 | 05:51AM
saywhatyouthink wrote:
They must have thought they were civil service employees and couldn't possibly lose their jobs. Stupid is as Union does!
on November 20,2012 | 04:39PM
soundofreason wrote:
on November 21,2012 | 05:49AM
Latest News/Updates
Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War

Political Radar
Climate change

Island Crafters

Warrior Beat
Empty pit

Political Radar

Political Radar
`Progressive hero’