Quantcast

Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 17 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Medicare releases information on payouts to individual doctors

By Chad Terhune, Noam N. Levey and Doug Smith

Los Angeles Times

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:29 p.m. HST, Apr 10, 2014



Ending decades of secrecy, Medicare is showing what the giant health care program for seniors pays individual doctors, and the figures reveal that more than a dozen physicians received in excess of $10 million each in 2012.

The Obama administration released a detailed account Wednesday of $77 billion in government payouts to more than 880,000 health care providers nationwide that year. The release of payment records involving doctors has been legally blocked since 1979, but recent court rulings removed those obstacles. No personal information on patients is disclosed.

ON THE NET:

Database of Medicare Payments to Hawaii Physicians

The two highest-paid doctors listed in the Medicare data are already under government review because of suspected improper billing. They include an ophthalmologist in the retiree haven of West Palm Beach, Fla., who topped the list by taking in more than $26 million to treat fewer than 900 patients. That is 61 times the average Medicare payout of $430,000 for an ophthalmologist. A Florida cardiologist received $23 million in Medicare payments in 2012, nearly 80 times the average amount for that specialty.

The overwhelming majority of doctors billed the government very modest amounts. Overall, 2 percent of health care providers accounted for 23 percent of the Medicare fees, the federal data show.

Medicare officials said disclosing payment data marks an unprecedented opportunity to make the nation’s health care system more transparent for consumers and accountable to taxpayers. Many consumer advocates and employers applauded the move.

“Providing consumers with this information will help them make more informed choices about the care they receive,” Jonathan Blum, Medicare’s principal deputy administrator, said last week. Medicare plans to post the data online.

Still, federal officials cautioned against drawing sweeping conclusions about individual doctors from the numbers. High payouts do not necessarily indicate improper billing or fraud, they say. Payments could be driven higher because providers were treating sicker patients who required more treatment.

The data reflect only Medicare Part B claims, which include doctor visits, lab tests and other treatment typically provided outside a hospital. They include what Medicare paid plus any money providers received from patients for deductibles and coinsurance. Altogether, the payouts totaled $99 billion paid to health care providers in 2012. These government figures don’t cover commercial insurance or Medicaid.

Even with those limits, experts say, the data could serve as an early warning for potential waste and abuse.

Spending on the Medicare program, which covers about 60 million elderly and disabled Americans, is expected to exceed $600 billion this year. There is broad agreement that fraud is rampant in both Medicare and Medicaid, the government health program for the poor, but estimates of the scope vary from $20 billion annually to $100 billion.

The American Medical Association and other physician groups have long opposed the release of the Medicare data.

AMA President Dr. Ardis Dee Hoven said the group remained concerned that inaccuracies in the data or misinterpretation might unfairly tar some physicians.

She said some individual physicians might appear to be billing huge amounts to Medicare when in fact it is their entire practice that bills under a single physician’s name. In other cases, high-volume physicians may actually be experts in their field who instead will be portrayed in a bad light.

“How does a physician or a practice get their reputation back?” Hoven said.

For 2012, the top recipient of Medicare money in the country was ophthalmologist Salomon Melgen, whose billings have already been the subject of federal investigation.

Melgen has been a heavy donor to Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J. Last year, federal officials said a grand jury was looking into Melgen’s billing practices, and a separate investigation was examining whether Menendez had improperly intervened on his behalf.

An attorney for Melgen, Kirk Ogrosky, said the physician had billed in accordance with Medicare rules. Ogrosky said the vast majority of the money attributed to Melgen reflected the cost of drugs used in treatment and that physician reimbursement is set at 6 percent above what is paid for the medications.

“Dr. Melgen strongly supports transparency in government,” Ogrosky said, “but engaging in speculation based on raw data is irresponsible.”

Cardiologist Asad Qamar in Ocala, Fla., ranked second nationally with $22.9 million in payments for seeing Medicare patients in 2012.

He said specialists like himself who provide a variety of services inside their own medical facility have much higher bills because they reflect both the physician’s professional fee and fees to cover staffing, medical devices and supplies.

Likewise, some oncologists say their payouts appear so much higher than their peers’ because they are covering the price of expensive cancer drugs that other doctors operating inside a hospital wouldn’t bill for.

“By doing everything in your office, your numbers will be astronomical,” Qamar said. “Looking at the sheer volume of payments is a gross mistake.”

Qamar said Medicare put his billing on heightened review and delayed reimbursements more than a year ago. “I am 100 percent confident we are not doing anything wrong,” he said.

The disclosure of physician payments follows the federal government’s release last year of hospital charges that showed wild variations among medical centers for the same procedure. Increasingly, consumers and employers are demanding more transparency to avoid unnecessary medical spending and to spur more competition over cost in the nation’s $2.7 trillion health care system.

“We can’t reward high-quality care and pay for value unless we know what we’re paying for health care services now,” said Bill Kramer, executive director for national health policy at the Pacific Business Group on Health, a nonprofit coalition that represents large employers.

In December, the inspector general for the U.S. Health and Human Services Department found 303 physicians who provided more than $3 million in Medicare Part B services in 2009. Medicare’s outside billing contractors flagged 104 of those providers, or 34 percent, for additional review and identified $34 million in overpayments. The audit didn’t name the doctors.

“The results of these reviews demonstrate that identifying clinicians who are responsible for high cumulative payments could be a useful means of identifying possible improper payments,” federal auditors wrote in their report.

In that earlier review, the highest-paid physicians in Medicare primarily worked in three specialties: internal medicine, radiation oncology and ophthalmology.

This new data show similar patterns. Many ophthalmologists are among the high-volume physicians because common eye conditions — cataracts, glaucoma and age-related macular degeneration — are overwhelmingly found in elderly patients, said Michael X. Repka, medical director for governmental affairs for the American Academy of Ophthalmology.

In addition to physicians, the new information sheds light on payments to laboratories, outpatient surgery centers, ambulance companies and imaging centers.






 Print   Email   Comment | View 17 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(17)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
awahana wrote:
Pretty lame.
You think the gov could have made at least a searchable web page, instead of lazy xls and tab delimited formats.
I guess its good for analysts who want the raw data to manipulate, but not consumer friendly, as not everyone has Excel.
on April 10,2014 | 03:13AM
sbpark wrote:
We've provided a searchable page for Hawaii: http://hsalinks.com/OGOl7t The New York Times has it searchable, too, for all states: http://hsalinks.com/1mZxqfa
on April 10,2014 | 06:19AM
lokela wrote:
About time we have some data to catch these abusers. Costs us money.
on April 10,2014 | 05:52AM
soundofreason wrote:
Doesn't mean a lot when you don't know what a doctor's expenditures are. A very one sided picture if the doctor owns a clinic.
on April 10,2014 | 07:32AM
aomohoa wrote:
It's all about money now and it is so easy for doctor to abuse Medicare. The government is so incompetent, it has no idea how to stop medicare and welfare abuse.
on April 10,2014 | 07:12PM
ryan02 wrote:
I hope there is serious jail time and confiscation of assets for all those who bilked the government (i.e., us taxpayers).
on April 10,2014 | 07:36AM
soundofreason wrote:
Why only part B providers(doctors/clinics) disclosed? Hospitals(part A) are entities too, capable of abuse on a larger scale and yet their figures are still hidden?
on April 10,2014 | 07:57AM
ellinaskyrt wrote:
The government did provide data on hospitals. You have to go to the government website to get it: http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/Medicare-Provider-Charge-Data/Physician-and-Other-Supplier.html
on April 10,2014 | 08:53AM
soundofreason wrote:
Thank you and after reading the story closer, it does mention that and the discrepancies they found.
on April 10,2014 | 08:05PM
burnetti wrote:
The top twenty table published in the StarAdvertiser isn't correct. The online list shows dozens of Hawaii doctors that have higher reimbursements that are not in the published list.
on April 10,2014 | 09:23AM
sailfish1 wrote:
Go after the people defrauding the Medicare system and hit them with severe penalties including lots of jail time. Impress upon Medicare providers that fraud will not be tolerated. Everything costs everyone more money because of all the crooks in the world.
on April 10,2014 | 10:18AM
cojef wrote:
Scary billing system and individuals solicited to receive bogus treatments. Doctors were supposed to be holy, holy and honest, but like any population, crooks abound, like any other population.
on April 10,2014 | 11:17AM
aomohoa wrote:
Doctors have no ethics any more. They lie about procedures they do and exaggerate so they can charge more. The patients don't have a clue. They think the doctors do so much for them because they care. They are just using people, because it's so easy with medicare.
on April 10,2014 | 07:15PM
entrkn wrote:
Huge improvements can certainly be made if all this is accurate. And that Palm Beach ophthalmologist who collected $26 million for 900 procedures and the Medicare personnel who approved those payments should be spending the rest of their lives in federal maximum security prisons.
on April 10,2014 | 11:35AM
aomohoa wrote:
Medicare personnel just don't care, just like the workers at Social Security. They have job security and a bad attitude.
on April 10,2014 | 07:17PM
CriticalReader wrote:
As many seniors and doctors can attest, being and treating a Medicare patient isn't a bed of roses. Patients have to find a physician willing to take on Medicare patients under Medicare reimbursement rules. Anyone know whether HMSA reimburses better, faster or easier than Medicare? If so, who do you think a doctor, absent some sense of public service commitment, is going to take? With this new reporting approach and the knee jerk reactions displayed by some of the poster here, you have to wonder whether physicians who currently accept Medicare patients start declining to treat them.
on April 10,2014 | 11:45AM
pupuleguy wrote:
The list here of the top 20 is completely inaccurate. Anyone can look at the data and see that.
on April 10,2014 | 05:54PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates
Blogs
Political Radar
`My side’

Political Radar
‘He reminds me of me’

Bionic Reporter
Needing a new knee

Warrior Beat
Monday musings

Small Talk
Burning money

Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout