Quantcast

Wednesday, July 23, 2014         

ISLAND VOICES


 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

No 'smoking gun' in cluster of shark attacks

By Carl Meyer and Kim Holland

POSTED:



The recent spate of shark attacks in Hawaii is unusual.

So far this year, there have been nine unprovoked attacks, whereas the average over the past 20 years was three to four per year.

We crave "smoking gun" explanations, but spikes in attack numbers may simply reflect natural variability and arise purely through chance. In most Hawaii cases the species of shark could not be identified, but tiger sharks are the suspected culprit in most severe attacks.

This year's apparent up-tick is difficult to explain, but one frequently heard explanation —the recovery of the sea turtle population — does not add up because the number of turtles has increased dramatically over the last 20 years whereas the number of attacks on humans has increased only slightly. Plus, turtles are only one part of the very varied diet of tiger sharks.

The slow, long-term increase in shark attack rates probably reflects gradually increasing numbers of people using the ocean. Scientists believe that the number of people rather than the number of sharks is what determines attack rates.

Our tracking studies indicate that tiger sharks visit shallow waters during both day and night, yet more than 60 percent of shark bites on people in Hawaii occur between the hours of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m., reflecting our preference for daytime water activities. There has never been any evidence of a "rogue" shark focusing on attacking humans.

We don't know the size of the population, but tiger sharks are common around all the Hawaiian Islands and are found over all parts of the reef — from the deep outer slopes to shallow bays — although they seem to be less frequent in very shallow waters used by swimmers. Of the 430 tiger sharks that we have caught and tagged, the largest was 15 feet long and this is probably about the maximum size for this species in Hawaii.

Our research shows that tiger sharks are constantly on the move and rarely "set up shop" at a specific spot. We have many instances of tagged sharks ranging up and down the entire length of the island chain and far out into open ocean. One of our tagged tiger sharks was caught by fishermen in Mexico! This constant mobility is why it makes no sense to try and catch the "culprit" after an attack — the shark will be long gone.

We have some indication that during fall, pregnant female tiger sharks congregate around the main Hawaiian islands to give birth to their pups. We do not know if this migration contributes to the rate of attacks at this time of year, or exactly where tiger sharks give birth — or even if they have specific birthing sites or depths.

Until they are about 8 feet long, tiger sharks feed mostly on reef fishes and invertebrates. As they get larger, tiger sharks eat bigger prey including other sharks, turtles and birds. Tiger sharks also scavenge carrion such as dead whales and carcasses carried down rivers — which is why you should stay away from murky river mouths after a rain.

Most shark attacks are not fatal. The best water safety tip is to not go in the water alone — go with a friend or seek out places where there are other people in the water. That way, if by some rare chance there is an attack, you can get help and someone can call for professional assistance.

Compared with other parts of the world, Hawaii is blessed with a remarkably low level of shark attacks. And we have to remember that the sharks that are in our waters are vital to the overall well being of our ocean environment.






 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(4)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
bender wrote:
There is a fallacy in the conclusions the authors drew about the increasing number of sea turtles and how it relates to attacks. It is common sense to assume that more food will draw more predators. But that doesn't mean there will be more attacks on humans. Attacks on humans are becuase of mistaken identity by the predeator and not all sharks will make that mistake.
on December 23,2012 | 07:08AM
waikiicapt wrote:
There are more sharks and there are more whales, too. Yes, there are more people. But given the "primary" food sources the authors site (especially whales), I would think it's the prime factor. ALL animals in the wild on land and in the sea, they go where the food is. A basic concept in nature. The number of Humpback whales visiting Hawaii doubles every seven years I believe (I might be wrong on the time frame, but it is a remarkable amount in a given time, I know that). Further, remember that the Humpbacks are giving birth while here in Hawaii. Newborn calves are a prime food source and vulnerable to a tiger shark. I don't think you have to be a marine scientist to figure out why so many shark attacks. Yes there are more people in the water and thus the statistics go up. But since tourism began back in the late 40's after the end of the war, there has always been a growing "human population" in the water. Yet these guys admit the 'growth' rate has been long and slow. The number of attacks have gone up only recently. Perhaps I'm wrong, but the obvious seems apparent to me. I once worked on a fishing boat (1970's) that was hired by state to "thin" the shark population. From what I remember, it did seem to have an effect, at least that's what the state told us later on.
on December 23,2012 | 09:33AM
Bdpapa wrote:
Great article.
on December 23,2012 | 11:13AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
I was glad to hear sharks do not have guns. I was sad to hear that they smoked.
on December 23,2012 | 12:36PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates