Quantcast
  

Tuesday, April 15, 2014         

ISLAND VOICES


 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Military presence in Hawaii helps preserve regional peace and stability

By Charlie Ota

POSTED:



We should not let James Abts' recent commentary go unanswered, wherein he alleges that the Middle East "has been our major strategic concern since the end of the Cold War and will likely remain so for the indefinite future" ("Deficit crisis Is chance to cut military bloat," Star-Advertiser, Oct 9).

He further stated that "Hawaii's strategic significance may rest more with nostalgia than reality, and the military presence here will continue to be largely about jobs and the politics of military spending."

Those statements are simply not in tune with a recent strategic policy dissertation by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, stating in part, "The future of politics will be decided in Asia, not Afghanistan or Iraq, and the United States will be right at the center of the action."

Clinton acknowledged that the time has come for the U.S. to assume leadership in the Asia-Pacific, stating, "Our economic recovery at home will depend on exports and the ability of American firms to tap the vast and growing consumer base of Asia. Strategically, maintaining peace and security across the Asia-Pacific is increasingly crucial to global progress, whether through defending freedom of navigation in the South China Sea, countering proliferation efforts of North Korea, or ensuring transparency in the military activities of the region's key players."

Clinton also stressed: "Open markets in Asia provide the United States with unprecedented opportunities for investment, trade and access to cutting-edge technology."

One of the six key lines of actions addressed by Clinton is the "forging of a broad-based military presence" in the Pacific to preserve regional peace and stability and promote growth of a thriving global economy.

We should be concerned that outcomes from the ongoing deliberations of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction could jeopardize continuing with the highly effective U.S. strategy of forward-basing our military forces to meet our security and economic goals.

The current U.S. military force structure in the Pacific, coupled with the forces of our allies, has met with unprecedented successes in deterring wars, enabling the flow of commerce and trade, and providing aid to Asia-Pacific economies recovering from disasters such as the tsunami that crushed towns, people and economies in parts of northeastern Honshu, Japan.

Rather, the joint committee must avoid causing draconian cuts that would force the U.S., inter alia, to compromise regional security. It is a risk with enormous economic consequences that could cause incalculable damage to the already struggling economies of the U.S. and our Asia-Pacific partners.

The threats of armed conflicts in the Asia-Pacific are real. North Korea continues to engage in nuclear proliferation. China is rapidly elevating its military capabilities to a global level, continues to claim ownership of international waters in the South China Sea, and has its ground-based missiles aimed at Taiwan. Taiwan struggles to counter by bolstering its military forces, albeit with U.S. aid. Terrorist cells continue to operate in parts of Southeast Asia.

These threats, if left unchecked by an ever-present and capable deterrent military force, could undermine U.S. goals in the Asia-Pacific and result in the loss of the many benefits that Americans take for granted.

Deterring armed conflict is crucial. It is the key factor in keeping the international waters of the South China Sea free and open for commerce and trade. It saves billions — trillions? — of dollars in war funding, avoids the needless killing of thousands of military personnel and innocent civilians, and helps to preserve the Earth's fragile environment and historic cultural sites. The costs of deterrence are miniscule compared to the costs of war and recovery, and the fruits that it bears with thriving global economies bring great joy to all — priceless.

It is hoped that the U.S. Departments of State and Defense and Hawaii's congressional delegation will prevail in convincing the joint committee to hold the line on making any cuts that will force the military to do less with even less, especially in the Asia-Pacific region.

Such actions would not only threaten regional security, but progress on the Trans-Pacific Partnership and Pacific-wide free trade agreements aimed at bringing together the economies of the Asia-Pacific, getting them back on the track to recovery, and putting millions of people back to work.






 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(6)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
saveparadise wrote:
People should realize that the military plays a huge part in driving our economy. So much manufacturing jobs depend on military contracts. Not only do our brave men and women protect our country, they would need employment otherwise. Where would they be employed right now if not in the military? Militaries are created to defend from outsiders plundering your resources. Let's all focus more on sustaining the resources so we need not plunder the outsiders.
on November 10,2011 | 03:18PM
Changalang wrote:
The Super Committee is at a stalemate and it will default to defense cuts in just over a week. Hawaii will be fine with the military we have. Who is going to attack us? China and Japan own so much Hawaiian real estate, we are basically annexed. North Korea listens to China. The age of the M.I.C. is grinding down.
on November 10,2011 | 05:45PM
Changalang wrote:
Addendum: The congressional Super Committee has less than two weeks to come up with a plan to cut $1.2 trillion in spending across the government. If the bipartisan panel fails to come up with a viable plan, Pentagon coffers could be slashed by $500 billion. Piled on top of the cuts already mandated by the White House, the Pentagon would be staring down a $1 trillion spending cut should the committee fail. Failure, Panetta warned, would come at a very high cost.
on November 10,2011 | 06:06PM
Changalang wrote:
Addendum: "The congressional Super Committee has less than two weeks to come up with a plan to cut $1.2 trillion in spending across the government. If the bipartisan panel fails to come up with a viable plan, Pentagon coffers could be slashed by $500 billion. Piled on top of the cuts already mandated by the White House, the Pentagon would be staring down a $1 trillion spending cut should the committee fail. Failure, Panetta warned, would come at a very high cost." That is the new Secretary of Defense and ex-CIA Chief talking.
on November 10,2011 | 06:09PM
tiki886 wrote:
Yeah, and they're' part of the anti-American Administration that HATES America. Ask them to recite the Pledge of Alligiance and they'd choke on those words!
on November 11,2011 | 12:25AM
tiki886 wrote:
China's surrogate North Korea, has been threatening Japan, S. Korea and Hawaii with missiles and missile technology provided by China. Now, provide your evidense that China and Japan own how much of Hawaiian real estate? I hope you're not referring to China Town.
on November 11,2011 | 12:08AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates
Blogs
Political Radar
HB 1700 — Day 1

Hoops Talk
Aloha Shamburger

Political Radar
Stacked

Political Radar
HFFA

Warrior Beat
All’s fair

Political Radar
Apology

Political Radar
SD 23