Quantcast
  

Friday, May 24, 2013         

ELECTIONS 2012


 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Rail and housing projects' impact among top issues

By Gordon Y.K. Pang

POSTED:

Former state Sen. Ron Menor is the biggest name in a field of four candidates vying for far-flung Hono­lulu City Council District 9, which runs from Mililani Town to Ewa Beach.

The others seeking the Council District 9 seat are schoolteacher Sy Cullen, Dr. Iman Rahman and businessman Vai Sua.

Menor, 56, is a longtime Mililani resident. With 24 years combined in the state Senate and House, the attorney is trying to make a political comeback after losing a Senate re-election bid in the 2008 Demo­cratic primary to Michelle Kidani by 108 votes.

In May 2008, Menor served two days in jail following a guilty plea stemming from an arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol. Today, Menor lists himself as a volunteer attorney for Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

Cullen, 26, is a lifelong Village Park resident making his first attempt at public office. He is the younger brother of state Rep. Ty Cullen.

Rahman, 60, is a Wai­pahu resident and medical doctor. He is making his fifth attempt at public office and second try for a Council seat.

Sua, a Waikele resident, is retired from the U.S. Army Reserves and owns a security company. He declined several requests for interviews and did not return a candidate questionnaire from the Star-Advertiser.

District 9 stretches from Mililani Town in the north through Waikele, Kunia and the northwestern section of Wai­pahu, and about half of Ewa Beach.

The 2011 city Reapportionment Commission, in drawing up new City Council district boundaries, split Mililani from Mililani Mauka and placed parts of Wai­pahu and parts of Ewa Beach in different Council districts.

The changes even confused some Council candidates, as campaign literature for District 1 candidates were sent to some District 9 households, and vice versa.

Despite the zigzag nature of District 9, the communities are united by several issues, Menor said.

"One of the major concerns is trying to get the city to provide adequate resources for badly needed services and infrastructure improvements," he said. "That's an issue that cuts across neighborhood lines."

Cullen said it might be a positive thing that residents of Mililani, Wai­pahu and Ewa Beach will now each have two members representing their interests on the Council.

"It's going to create collaboration between the two representatives, allowing us to … share the load," Cullen said.

Rahman said he is not intimidated by the vastness of the district, noting that he's heard the day-to-day concerns of patients from Mililani to Ewa Beach.

The city's $5.26 billion rail project and the arrival of two major housing developments are among the top concerns for the community.

Each of the three candidates interviewed said they support rail but promised to keep scrutinizing it.

Rahman said that at first he opposed the rail project. But after it won approval on the ballot, he began to look at rail differently, he said.

"I started to see more advantages than disadvantages," Rahman said, particularly as an alternate transit option and as a job creator. He would also ask those benefiting financially from transit-oriented development to contribute to community care centers that provide health, child and senior care.

However, he said, it's important that bus routes not be affected by rail or by funding for other city needs. Rahman said he spoke to Iroquois Point residents who say they have to walk a mile to get to a bus stop.

"We need to make sure that the bus system is separate," he said.

Cullen said he sees rail as a key element toward creating balanced growth in Central and West Oahu. Drawing development toward urban areas will allow for decision-makers to "keep the country country," he said.

"The biggest issue or task that we need to handle together definitely is balancing growth with the needed jobs and needed economic development," Cullen said.

"We just need to balance what's going to be occurring or forthcoming along the rail line," he said, noting that rail is primarily about helping future generations.

MENOR said that "in the absence of an effective alternative, I believe rail can help alleviate congestion on the road, reduce the hours and money lost to traffic and improve the quality of life in the long term."

It will also stimulate jobs and direct managed growth into the future, he said.

But the project needs to proceed carefully "and with greater transparency than has been provided by the city in the past," Menor said.

He empathizes with those who've raised concerns about rail, he said. "If we proceed with rail, it needs to be done as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible, and within budget," he said.

The Land Use Commission in recent months approved two large development projects. Koa Ridge, between Mililani and Wai­pio, could add as many as 5,000 homes. Ho‘o­pili could bring as many as 12,000 homes to farmland between Kapolei, Ewa Beach and Wai­pahu.

Both projects are contentious because of their size and because they are on agricultural lands. Both will also need further approvals from the City Council.

ALL three candidates interviewed said they support a balanced approach to growth.

Prior to approving any type of development, the Council needs to look at "the impact on existing facilities and infrastructure, agriculture, affordable housing and sustainability," Menor said.

"Growth needs to occur in a thoughtful and planned manner that enhances our overall quality of life, supports our sustainability goals and protects our natural resources," he said, noting that he once was a deputy attorney general assigned to reviewing coastal zone management area projects.

Cullen said he views rail and Ho‘o­pili working hand in hand as tools to help future generations. While attending college in Portland, Ore., he said, he was able to experience the integration of a well-planned mass transit system with a developing community.

"Balancing growth is the major issue," Cullen said.

LUC approval for both Ho‘o­pili and Koa Ridge (just outside the district) came after years of analysis and review, making it difficult for Council members to stop either even if they wanted to, Rahman said.

"I want to protect agricultural lands," he said, adding that he would vote to reject future projects proposed on farmlands. "But it will be very hard to go back and change the change."






 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
999
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have read and agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. Any violations of these terms may result in account suspension or deactivation. Please keep your comments civil and in good taste. To report a comment, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
MalamaKaAina wrote:
I voted for Ben!
on July 31,2012 | 01:38AM
jayz43 wrote:
Special Interest Groups Claim Rail will reduce traffic...Really?: http://www.youtube.com/embed/l32sOReYwdA?rel=0&autoplay=1
on July 31,2012 | 03:09AM
ukuleleblue wrote:
Nice to see more candidates that are in favor of rail. We need rail for the future for our children and grandchildren. Public transportation such as rail helps residents so that they can live further out at a more affordable cost. We need to provide these services for average local middle class people in Kapolei, Waipahu and other leeward communities to help their quality of life. Otherwise they will have to move away to affordable places on the mainland. The cost structure for rail is very fair with a large $1.55 billion federal subsidy and we cannot lose that to other states by letting the needed rail project fail. The rail project will never bankrupt our city. If we need to raise taxes to pay for rail, we should. We live in the best place in the entire world and there will always be people willing to pay to live here. Therefore we can always support essential government services through taxes. Property taxes can be raised for high priced luxury homes. Middle and lower income classes can always get a state income tax credit through special legislation to offset increases in general excise tax for needed public services. We need to have government provide services such as rail for the less privileged locals who already live here and can get squeezed out by rich foreigners. Rail helps the average local so don't get fooled by people who say it will hurt us.
on July 31,2012 | 03:29AM
MalamaKaAina wrote:
ukuleleblue = a paid blogger with wacko comments!
on July 31,2012 | 03:46AM
wiliki wrote:
Not wacko... just the truth. We all want the truth and nothing but the truth.

Note that all these candidates support rail. They recognize the the people of their communities are really fed up with the traffic congestion and want rail.


on July 31,2012 | 01:52PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Wiliki, rail does not relieve traffic congestion. To relieve traffic congestion on the H1, just bring over and apply it on the H1 the solution to traffic congestion now used in several states of the US.
on July 31,2012 | 03:35PM
jayz43 wrote:
Where the Rail Project stands today: We are now down to the wire. We, the Plaintiffs, have filed our final motion, and the City, the FTA, and the Intervenors have filed their responses, and now the attorneys will prepare for the final hearing this August 21, at 10:00 AM in Federal Courthouse PJKK, Honolulu. Prior to that date, Governor Cayetano could take the Mayoral election on August 11 should he get 50 percent of the votes plus one. Otherwise, the two candidates with the largest number of votes will face each other in the General Election in November. Recently Governor Abercrombie tipped his hand in allowing that for him this race will be a referendum on the future of rail. That means that if Ben wins, both the Mayor and Governor would be opposed to the rail project. FTA has always said they need to have strong local political support if they are to fund rail. Without the support of the Mayor and Governor, RAIL IS DEAD. honolulutraffic.com
on July 31,2012 | 03:50AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
jay z, Ambercrombie supports Rail. Why would he have signed off on the EIS that Lingle was stalling? Neil promise he would sign off when he became governor, and that's what he did! More LIES from the land of NO.
on July 31,2012 | 09:08AM
jayz43 wrote:
Abercrombie was also against the Hoopili project...and then?
on July 31,2012 | 01:43PM
wiliki wrote:
Abercrombie also believes in community planning and Hoopili is already designated as an urban area. He may regret the loss of farmland but there is still about 50,000 acres of prime farmland available and only 4000 acres being farmed. It's not that critical a problem.
on July 31,2012 | 01:56PM
islandsun wrote:
Then his chief of staff took over. The former PRP honcho.
on July 31,2012 | 03:57PM
Eagle156 wrote:
Of course rail is dead but so many people are in denial. President Obama, who is under pressure to reduce the deficit. stated several weeks ago that he will never approve another bridge to nowhere or similar pet projects. The rail project fits perfectly into the category of projects that he will reject. It is an ill conceived high capacity monstrosity starting in an empty farm field,terminating at a shopping center and projecting an impossible 116,000riders to pay for it.
on July 31,2012 | 09:32AM
wiliki wrote:
Your lie should be self evident....
on July 31,2012 | 01:57PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Your reply actually confirms the statement of Eagle156 - rail is dead but so many people are in denial. Relieving traffic congestion on the H1 is a better option than rail and cost billions and billions less. All that needs to be done is bring over the solution to traffic congestion used in several other states such as Florida (I-4),Washington State (I-5) and apply it on the H1. With traffic congestion gone, rail should also be gone.
on July 31,2012 | 03:39PM
aomohoa wrote:
Trust me, wikiki, we have all stopped paying attention to you paid pro rail bloggers. You are all a joke. They did not get their monies worth. Bad investment.
on August 1,2012 | 10:03AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
The last I read, Rail is on track. Construction is on going and ahead of schedule because of beautiful weather. The GET is flowing in. The economy and the tourist industry is booming! Our mayor,city council and the public have spoken, Rail is Whats Happening right here,Right Now.....the NO gang is just that,,all NO and NO go.
on July 31,2012 | 04:38PM
kahuku01 wrote:
I don't know what you read but it must have been a comic book because ever since the city council implemented the resolutions upon HART, work on the rail project have slowed down considerably especially when the $1.55 billion grant from the fed have not been approved...waiting, waiting, and still waiting and like your partner Uku said, "must start now or inflation will jack up the cost." Wait too long and HART will have to use the contingency fund for renegotiating and amend existing contracts. This is why Uku is much in a rush to start now!
on July 31,2012 | 06:10PM
Kuniarr wrote:
You are just mouthing propaganda your boss gives yoiu.
on July 31,2012 | 09:59PM
wondermn1 wrote:
Great post jayz43. nuff said
on July 31,2012 | 05:21PM
soshaljustic wrote:
Uku-please do not forget- children and grandchildren must take care of aging kapuna. No way can we support a rail system when far more monies are needed to support the para transportation system that currently is denying these kapuna their trips to the grocery stores, visits with their elder friends, hospital visits, cemetery visits, all their social networks beside their medical visits that free-up their adult children to work and maintain an economically viable lifestyle. Para transportation (HandiVans) do not run on train tracks, and your non-concerned legislators about this graying tsunami of elders and disabled aging WILL put you and your succeeding generations in the POOR HOUSE if you continue to be apathetic to this crucial issue! A trinket of transit today costing billions WILL cost you TRILLIONS tomorrow in other social supports needed to prop up this aging community with denied infrastructure supports NEEDED TODAY!! STOP shopping for trinkets!!! View the long run. A great indication is how the Rail is ready to treat our IWI of little to NO consequence. The writing is on the Train Station WALL!
on July 31,2012 | 07:23AM
saveparadise wrote:
You are so correct soshaljustic. This ukuleleblue person is trying to make the rail sound like a 5 cent bottle of Dr. Good. A cure all for everything. In reality it benefits vendors and developers who will profit millions while we and our children embrace higher cost of living with all the government spending.
on July 31,2012 | 08:36AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Funny soshajustice says our "iwi's"! When Walmart was built on Keeamoku and all the iwi's were uncovered, no soshajustice there. When Whole Earth at Ward center was being graded, boom, more iwi's, nothing done! JN auto group ,cayetaNO backers, building a massive condonat Ward and Kapiolani that will dig these iwi's up, probably more then the rail columns, guess what? NO protest from NO or the NO gang like yourself. So don't use the ancient Hawaiian graves as a convenient excuse.
on July 31,2012 | 09:15AM
jayz43 wrote:
Obviously some learn from past mistakes... you should, too.
on July 31,2012 | 01:47PM
Kuniarr wrote:
No need for rail. Traffic congestion on the H1 can be relieved. Just bring over the solution to traffic congestion now used in several states of the US and several countries in Europe and then apply the solution to traffic congestion on the H1,
on July 31,2012 | 03:41PM
wiliki wrote:
This is just too too much shibai.
on July 31,2012 | 01:58PM
Kuniarr wrote:
True, rail propagand is just too much shibai.
on July 31,2012 | 03:42PM
Keone_Mikaele wrote:
ukublew is Doug Carlson. Sounds like the SAME PROPAGANDA over and over paid by HART with Tax-Payer $$$.
on July 31,2012 | 07:24AM
saveparadise wrote:
Mr./Ms. ukuleleblue, Sorry, you are sounding like a salesperson selling Dr. Good. Stop the propaganda, you could be selling something so different from what you are claiming.
on July 31,2012 | 08:50AM
aomohoa wrote:
Bla Bla Bla! Same old same old. I don't even think you should paid for your pro rail blogging. All you do is copy and paste same old garbage.
on July 31,2012 | 09:05AM
AKULEMAN wrote:
Uku - Then came Ben the these guys will go rolling in the deep!
on July 31,2012 | 10:30AM
Kuniarr wrote:
To relieve Traffic Congestion on the H1, just bring over and apply on the H1 the solution to Traffic Congestion that is already in use in many states of the US such as Florida on Interstate-4, Washington State on Interstate-5.
on July 31,2012 | 12:35PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Sorry, Ukuleleleblue. Rail is not the answer to traffic congestion. Several states and countries have found a solution to traffic congestion by making the highway smart. Smart, meaning that whenever a congestion occurs at any place on the highway, the highway has signs that instructs drivers what is going on miles ahead and to begin a gradual slowing down from 55-50-45-40 mph so that on reaching the location of where congestion occurred, vehicles travel at 35-45 mph and speed up after the passing thru the location of congestion.
on August 1,2012 | 02:26PM
wondermn1 wrote:
I will vote for Ben as well
on July 31,2012 | 05:19PM
Wazdat wrote:
Yup, both my wife and I just voted for Ben
on July 31,2012 | 05:54AM
Keone_Mikaele wrote:
I voted for Ben too----- END THE RAIL MAFIA------District 9 is a BIG LIE-------The PRO-RAIL THIEVES CUT UP TOM BERG'S DISTRICT------Ewa Beach in now in Mililani!!!!!!!!!!!----------SO STUPID---------ALL DONE BY PRO-RAIL THUGS to defeat BERG-------Watch as WW-III Danny's Rail Mafia RIG THE ELECTION against BEN.------They will stop at NOTHING!!!
on July 31,2012 | 07:22AM
Changalang wrote:
Berg should re-locate his filing address to a more amicable district. Once he has a shield, he will really raise hell. After he loses this time, the Hawaii GOP should think about what is possible.
on July 31,2012 | 08:51AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Chang, could you Adopt-a-Councilman, and reveal your District. That way Tom can start packing before Nov.
on July 31,2012 | 09:03AM
aomohoa wrote:
Berg will win and he cares about the people in his district!
on July 31,2012 | 09:07AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Berg should use his blogname CouncilmanBerg instead of hiding behind some of these post.
on July 31,2012 | 09:17AM
aomohoa wrote:
The paid bloggers should tell the truth about who they are and that they are getting paid to do it. They always avoid the subject.
on July 31,2012 | 09:36AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
The anti rail bloggers should tell the truth ,who they are and how much Slater is paying them. Or how much Auto Group is paying them. Those car salesmen are a slick crafty bunch.
on July 31,2012 | 01:20PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Anti-rail bloggers have an axe to grind because they all will be come victims by rail - victims in that the property tax they pay doubles with rail.
on July 31,2012 | 03:44PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Another bs lie,kuni.
on July 31,2012 | 04:43PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Really, NanakuliBoss, you are not getting paid overtime. So get a rest.
on July 31,2012 | 08:21PM
aomohoa wrote:
Excuse me I am just a resident of Ewa Beach speaking my opinion.
on August 1,2012 | 10:05AM
false wrote:
false3. We did too.
on July 31,2012 | 08:52AM
ukefan wrote:
========THE TRAINWRECK HAS STARTED======= We voted walk-in at Honolulu Hale this morning. My spouse was the 50%er vote for BEN and my vote was the 1. All the rail shysters and their paid shills that have been trying to suck the quality of life out of our beloved island can start looking for new venues---hopefully in Siberia, Syria or some Federal Corrections Facility... Go BEN, Go Tom...
on July 31,2012 | 12:09PM
what wrote:
If you don't want to see your property taxes go up, and you prefer the convenience of driving a car, make sure to vote for a candidate that will make sure rail does not get out of control. Rail will add another $50-$100 to property taxes. Even at $6 per ride, not even half the cost to operate and maintain rail will be recovered. Estimates are that it will cost over $120 million per year to operate and maintain rail, but the city does not know how it will pay for it. The Federal money will stop, and the GET will sunset. It is obvious that they will have to raise property taxes, because right now the city can barely afford to pay for the bus. If you like driving cars, make sure you vote for someone who supports your lifestyle choice.
on July 31,2012 | 01:44AM
inlanikai wrote:
Dear Mr. Mayor & HART: How will you pay for the O&M costs that fare revenue will not cover year after year after Rail is built? Tell us now BEFORE the election? Dear City Council candidates: You should be asking the question above NOW if you want to convince the voters that your deserve our vote and trust.
on July 31,2012 | 02:15AM
ukuleleblue wrote:
Real property tax rates are actually very low here compared to places on the mainland. Property tax rates could be raised for high price luxury homes while taxes for homes in the affordable range for middle class people kept lower. There are always fair ways for government to raise money funds for needed services such as rail.
on July 31,2012 | 03:36AM
jayz43 wrote:
For those who don’t want generations of their family to be saddled with the enormous DEBT of building and maintaining Rail, August 11th is a game-changing date. The ADDED COSTS of rail continue to rise with every City revelation: now property taxes may very well DOUBLE because of rail and the cost of upkeep, inevitable passenger groping and mischief on packed shoulder-to-shoulder rush hour scenarios will necessitate an added authority presence and MORE ADDED COST, and unforeseen added maintenance COSTS, which ALSO befell Halawa Stadium’s steel exposure to Hawaii’s salt air. Rail could/will become a bottomless pit of GENERATIONS of ADDED COSTS.
on July 31,2012 | 03:42AM
inlanikai wrote:
UB: But we don't live on the Mainland. And when comparing property taxes you have to look at the total tax burden to the resident not just one of the many taxes. Politicians are great at telling you they are taking little out of your right pocket while they pick your left one clean. Hawaii has one of the highest per capita tax burdens of any state: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_tax_levels_in_the_United_States
on July 31,2012 | 04:38AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
How much is your property tax inlanikai? That area is considered the 1percenters. Like Bens Waialae Iki, and Slaters Pacific Heights. The true 1 per centers of Honolulu. Those protected by the GOP shylocks.
on July 31,2012 | 01:24PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Property taxes have been going up. This year it is up by over 10%. But after rail is built, property taxes can double and even triple.
on July 31,2012 | 03:50PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Most anti bloggers like Keith Haugen actually gets a senior citizen break on his property tax.
on July 31,2012 | 04:45PM
Kuniarr wrote:
NanakuliBoss, you are not paid to work overtime. Get a rest.
on July 31,2012 | 08:20PM
aomohoa wrote:
It is so obvious who the paid pro rail bloggers are. The anti rail citizens are just sick of you and we don't get paid to speak our opinion. You get paid to say whatever you are told, whether you believe it or not. I guess that's kind of like selling your soul!
on August 1,2012 | 10:07AM
kahuku01 wrote:
Gee Nanakuli, you must not own property and having to pay the high taxes appraised and set by the city. It's easy to talk about property taxes especially if you don't own a property and having to face increases year after year. It's just a corrupt city government that stick it to the people when they require more funds to restore, maintain or build projects.
on July 31,2012 | 06:49PM
dedicatedteacher7 wrote:
Maybe, but our cost of living is much higher here than on the mainland.
on July 31,2012 | 05:33AM
Kuniarr wrote:
That's right, ukeleleblue, let's keep that way. What's the big idea of doubling our property tax because of rail?
on July 31,2012 | 12:37PM
Imagen wrote:
The problem I have with your comment ukuleleblue is that government has only one source for funds and that is the taxpayer - me/us/you. Well unfortunately, I can barely dog-paddle through every month as it is, and you want me to pay for a project just so a chosen few can have an ALTERNATIVE to their commute? Iam very sorry, but I have nothing else to give you for your rail project.
on July 31,2012 | 01:44PM
islandsun wrote:
Here we go again. Another transplant telling us we should be like the mainland. Too bad taxpayers have to pay his wages right now. Pretty soon the whole westside will be like the mainland.
on July 31,2012 | 04:01PM
kahuku01 wrote:
In no way that your suggestion will become a reality. The city council and city administration mimic the 3 monkeys. Can't see, hear or speak up with the exception of Berg. If these historical homes pay $3 hundred a year in taxes, how in the world do you expect these rich people that own luxury homes have their property taxes increase? It would be the other way around, the middle class people will end up paying more on their property tax like it has been for decades and why should it change now. Yes there are always ways for government to raise funds for needed services such as rail and bottle tax. Mandating taxes against the people for the government...how easy..it doesn't take a genius to figure that out!
on July 31,2012 | 06:35PM
Gary_S wrote:
BRT will at least double the number of buses and the O and M cost will be over $200 million per year. How will this be paid? Don't forget that taxpayer subsidy for buses is 70% of the actual cost of the fare. The subsidy for rail will only be 60% of the fare.
on July 31,2012 | 07:17AM
Kuniarr wrote:
Gary_S, what is this baloney about "BRT will at least double the number of buses "? It is obvious you do not understand nor know what BRT means. For your information, BRT simply means changing the way bus travel such that instead of mixing with cars and trucks on the road, the bus travels on its very own lane separated from the traffic of cars and trucks.
on July 31,2012 | 12:42PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Your baloney kuni. You say this and that about BRT but the fact is it ain't up and running or built. So genius your using assumptions! Try BRT on H1 between Aala and University. Lol would never happen. All the anti townies would be screaming about congestion.lol.
on July 31,2012 | 01:28PM
Kuniarr wrote:
NanakuliBoss, if you have nothing to say, why say it? You are out of topic with your baloney of a blog. Let me remind you that the topic of the discussin between Gary_S and Kuniarr (me) is his claim that BRT doubles the number of buses. My response is that BRT does not involve anything but changing the way buses travel.
on July 31,2012 | 02:37PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Your baloney with salami, kuni.! Bens BRT looks to boost buses in the inventory! More buses with more drivers! Where have you been? Read Bens plan. You are off topic.
on July 31,2012 | 04:48PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Nope. Changing to BRT involves only having the bus travel on dedicated lanes instead of mixing with traffic.
on July 31,2012 | 08:19PM
kinkyhobo wrote:
Haven't lived in Hawaii for a while, but why is there so much attention paid to what would be the ongoing cost of rail, but there seems none paid to the cost of maintaining the flyovers, BRT, expanded road systems or the other alternatives to rail? Is there a funding source in place to cover the operating expenses of the alternatives to rail? In fact is there a funding source in place to cover the design and building of the alternatives? Is there a timeline to for the design, vetting, permitting, construction and opening of the alternatives?
on July 31,2012 | 08:01AM
MKN wrote:
@kinkyhobo: Unfortunately, the city has placed all of their eggs into one basket. The rail project is supposed to be the greatest thing to come along since sliced bread. In fact, most of the supporters of rail are opposed to any other solutions because of the substantial financial gain that rail will provide to their masters/employers. More permanent and cheaper solutions such as requiring city/state non-customer service type positions to telework from home are not even being considered. You could even give private companies a tax credit to have their employees telework and it would be way cheaper than rail.
on July 31,2012 | 10:09AM
Kuniarr wrote:
Rail is worthless. Traffic congestipn on the H1 can be fixed just by bringing over and applying the solution to traffic congestion used in nine other states of the US such as in Florida (on the I-4) and Washington State (on the I-5)
on July 31,2012 | 12:44PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Kinkyhobo, Freeway fly overs are the State problems. In Hawaii the State does a very bad job of anything. The City of Honolulu government is better run. The State and Ben cayetaNO did an end run on Kapolei and the second city back in the late 90s. What was promised, never happened, Government buildings and infrastructure was cut back. Even Linda Lingle did more for Kapolei then cayetaNO.
on July 31,2012 | 01:33PM
waynej wrote:
Build a real 2nd city. Need jobs there. Need highrise office buildings, etc. Then we no need rail. People will live closer to real 2nd city.
on July 31,2012 | 02:28PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Without new construction, traffic congestion on the H1 can be relieved by just bringing over and applying it on the H1 the solution to traffic congestion used in other states such as that on I-5 in Washington State.
on July 31,2012 | 03:53PM
Kaleo744 wrote:
I voted for Tata Ben, Kia'aina and Wooley
on July 31,2012 | 04:09AM
Wazdat wrote:
I voted for BEN
on July 31,2012 | 05:54AM
loquaciousone wrote:
Did Menor fix his contact lenses?
on July 31,2012 | 06:56AM
soundofreason wrote:
Anybody who can't cough up an "extra" $5,500(cost of rail per citizen - BEFORE operating taxes) needs to vote for Ben. A vote for any other candidate means you have an "extra" $5,500 to burn.
on July 31,2012 | 07:09AM
McCully wrote:
Over the years, any major projects has gone into the red and the people end up paying for it for years by paying hidden taxes. One good exmple is the rust stadium and the convention center that is used maybe once a month. Now you want to build the rail? Rail will be used in the morning and afternoon. Not at all during non peak time. The buses are full during rush traffic, but slows down during non peak hours. That should tell you rail will cost the taxpayers millions every year to keep it running.
on July 31,2012 | 07:26AM
loquaciousone wrote:
We are already paying the hidden tax for the rail in cuts in bus services, unpicked up trash, pot holes the size of Carlisle ego, and a sewer system that if not addressed will completely halt any development along the proposed imaginary rail corridor.
on July 31,2012 | 07:50AM
Keone_Mikaele wrote:
BERG's District CHOPPED UP and Ewa Beach Put in Mililani---To HELP PRO-RAILERS----BERG IS RIGHT_____Fixed Guideway BRT projects to receive at least 80 percent federal funding share each fiscal year. These provisions provide a significant opportunity for communities seeking to invest in BRT------------------the bill modifies the definition of Bus Rapid Transit projects to broaden the use of the program.------------ BRT projects will now be classified and funded as either Corridor-Based or Fixed Guideway. -------------------Corridor-Based BRT projects lack a separate right-of-way but include defined features that emulate rail service and are considered a small start. Fixed Guideway --------------------------BRT projects include all the same features as the former category, but the majority of the project operates in a separate right-of-way dedicated to public transportation during peak periods.
on July 31,2012 | 07:52AM
yhls wrote:
The people who support rail are really naive if they believe the city and county of Honolulu can effectively manage a project of this magnitude. You only need look at places like Vegas where they thought the rail was such a no-brainer, how could anybody not use it idea. It's become a complete fiasco!
on July 31,2012 | 08:03AM
NITRO08 wrote:
You are comparing apples and oranges. The rail in Vegas was a ride in a carnival not transportation it should have gone all the way to down town Vegas. The rail from Kapolei to Ala moana is transportation. 30 years ago I lived in Makakilo there was nothing at Kapolei now the second city a lot of houses with more to come. Buses are already in place now you need transportation not using existing roads if you can't see that then you are only looking to now and not the future!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
on July 31,2012 | 08:30AM
MKN wrote:
@NITRO08: The Vegas rail is not the only project that has had problems. Atlanta has ridership problems as well. The proposed LA Train that was initially supported back in 2008 (much like our train) is now not being supported by the majority of its citizens (much like how rail support has decreased here as well). We should do the most fiscally responsible thing right now and that is to cancel this rail project. Here's a link to the article in the Los Angeles Times stating that rail is no longer supported by the majority of LA citizens:

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/06/californians-high-speed-rail-project-poll.html
on July 31,2012 | 11:51AM
kahuku01 wrote:
The rail (mono-rail) in Vegas was a form of transportation. It transported people from various casinos and stops, This form of transportation was to eliminate driving their vehicles from one casino to the other and paying for a taxi ride since walking from casinos to casinos was quite a distance. Now, people are impatient to wait for the next rail car or the rail car is full and have caught the taxi and city bus to their destination and the ridership have decreased tremendously.
on July 31,2012 | 07:14PM
Descartes22 wrote:
The one track mind railers discount all other issues of concern this election. I keep seeing assertions that individuals pro and con are paid to spew their comments. With the juvenile banter and inartful prose, I cannot imagine any of these persons being paid to write anything - though perhaps a penny a sentence might be worth it.
on July 31,2012 | 08:04AM
kainalu wrote:
This morning at 0645, the KHON traffic report showed the traffic coming in from the west on the H-1 freeway backed-up to the Kunia interchange - some 20-miles out of Honolulu. Coming in from the East, the Punahou street overpass camera showed the traffic zooming under it. There's a message here: DON'T MOVE OUT TO THE EWA PLAIN, WAIANAE COAST, OR CENTRAL OAHU, unless you want to spend several hours a day out of your life sitting in bumper-to-bumper traffic. The problem of course, is that some 60,000 housing units have been built on the Ewa Plain/Makakilo alone over the past several decades. What's a working-class stiff to do?
on July 31,2012 | 08:35AM
Changalang wrote:
Yup, those guys are really p!ssed about RAil construction closing those lanes at the exchange. They just needed proof that Rail Construction would make traffic WAY WORSE for a decade of change order construction. Brilliant plan. LOL.
on July 31,2012 | 08:53AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Smart people, all support Rail..All the NO gang from Honolulu and the East side cannot vote for this district. Out of the two council district featured today, 5 out of 6 says RAIL. On this poll, that's 80%, with Lillian Hong, 6 time loser, holding the ground for NO.
on July 31,2012 | 08:59AM
aomohoa wrote:
So smart people all support rail. Are you saying that a large % of the people on Oahu are stupid? No, we are just smarting up about the corruption and payoffs connected with this rail. People are not against rail, they are again the high cost and this ugly noisy steel, outdated rail. They are angry about the s deception that has surround the rail.
on July 31,2012 | 09:13AM
AKULEMAN wrote:
Then came Ben then there goes the big NO to rail.
on July 31,2012 | 10:45AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Right Akule, the big NO. No sewers,no fix roads,no clean park...easy to run the city on NO.
on July 31,2012 | 01:36PM
Kuniarr wrote:
That's because of rail. But without rail, sewers get fixed, parks get clean.... easy to run the city without rail.
on July 31,2012 | 02:48PM
NITRO08 wrote:
YOU CAN NOT USE THE RAIL MONY FOR ANY THING ELSE!
on July 31,2012 | 03:34PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Yes that's true. Do you not know that the subsidy for Rail is $5.87 billion as reported to the FTA?
on July 31,2012 | 04:41PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
No kuni, your property tax pay for sewers parks etc...Rail is paid by GET and cannot ever be used to fix the toilets. Okay. GET it.
on July 31,2012 | 04:52PM
kahuku01 wrote:
This 1/2 % surcharge was mandated since 2007 and to be collected from all residents and tourist on Oahu. If the rail is all PAU, should the millions collected for the rail be returned to the people or designated to city service that require funding? Why can't it be used to fix toilet if the rail does not exist? You know the city council will come up with something...maybe buy new furniture for the council offices?
on July 31,2012 | 07:54PM
kinkyhobo wrote:
Because the law allowed the State to collect the additional GET, and it is up to the State Legislature to release the funds to something other than rail use. I haven't been in Hawaii for a while, but from past experience I'm betting giving the State Legislature access to a large pot of cash will not turn out for the best for the citizens of Honolulu. I can see it now how the Legislature will "borrow" some funds from the rail GET until they figure out how to disperse it to the City and County of Honolulu
on August 1,2012 | 12:11AM
Kuniarr wrote:
Nope. That $5.87 billion in subsidy reported to the FTA in the financial analysis comes from property tax. $5.87 billion!!!
on July 31,2012 | 10:01PM
NITRO08 wrote:
AKULEHEAD LIKE I SAID BEFORE WHERE WAS BEN 4 YEARS AGO BEFORE THE MILLIONS WAS SPENT.
on July 31,2012 | 03:33PM
kahuku01 wrote:
I hope you're not talking about yourself but if you're included amongst the smart people, read between the letters:L O L!!! We do have many people with high degree of education, intelligence and common sense that are against rail. So what's the big deal about being smart?
on July 31,2012 | 07:45PM
Kuniarr wrote:
We do not need rail. "Fueled by a partnership with the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) and the Washington State Department of Transportation's (WSDOT) Moving Washington initiative, the Seattle area is leading the State's fight against congestion by making its busiest highways "smarter." (Source: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/publicroads/11septoct/03.cfm)
on July 31,2012 | 10:07PM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Funny that not one of these candidates has anything to say about rail not going to Ewa Beach. Or that it will not help the H1/H2 merge. Or add an option to the Mililani commute. Menor will, of course, win and as we have seen from his impaired driving behavior, basically do anything humanly possible to look out for his own welfare and preserve a quarter century of feeding at the tax trough. And so it goes....
on July 31,2012 | 09:11AM
false wrote:
false3. Remember folks, all your blogging against rail won't mean a thing unless you vote. Go Ben Go!
on July 31,2012 | 09:16AM
oxtail01 wrote:
I'm a long time Mililani resident and I joined others in voting LYING Menor out!. If he mans up and admits to his LYING, I may reconsider but until such time NO WAY!
on July 31,2012 | 09:29AM
AKULEMAN wrote:
Yes, Menor can't be trusted; the reason why he lost his political sit.
on July 31,2012 | 10:26AM
Publicbraddah wrote:
"Sua, a Waikele resident, is retired from the U.S. Army Reserves and owns a security company. He declined several requests for interviews and did not return a candidate questionnaire from the Star-Advertiser." In my book, anytime you run for office and refuse interviews, you're hiding something and you're OUT!
on July 31,2012 | 10:39AM
Anonymous wrote:
Now please vote Kidani out!
on July 31,2012 | 10:57AM
sailfish1 wrote:
All three mentioned here are NOT worthy candidates for the city council.
on July 31,2012 | 10:58AM
sunnyhi wrote:
Is Sy Cullen related to Rep Ty Cullen? They don't look like twins. LOL. Anybody but Menor. And, if they don't do the job right, perhaps I'll run for their seat at the next election just to bring reason and common sense back to the Council. :-)
on July 31,2012 | 11:16AM
Kuniarr wrote:
To relieve Traffic Congestion on the H1, just bring over and apply on the H1 the solution to Traffic Congestion that is already in use in many states of the US such as Florida on Interstate-4, Washington State on Interstate-5.
on July 31,2012 | 12:34PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Bs kuni. Just move to Florida.
on July 31,2012 | 01:38PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Rail support collapses when everyone knows that traffic congestion on the H1 can now be relieved without building new roads or adding new lanes. Rail propaganda can not anymore brag about being an alternative to traffic congestion nor brag that it will remove 40,000 car trips when traffic congestion does not exist anymore on the H1 - during the morning and afternoon rush hour or during a traffic accident on the H1.
on July 31,2012 | 02:30PM
Kuniarr wrote:
So, NanakuliBoss. a solution to traffic congestion without building new roads nor adding new lanes already exists and is now being used on Interstate-4 and Interstate-5 and even on the world reknown Autobahn in Germany. Rail support collapses when traffic congestion relief is brought upon the H1.
on July 31,2012 | 02:46PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
NO going work,kuni.
on July 31,2012 | 04:54PM
Kuniarr wrote:
Rail is toast, NB, get over it.
on July 31,2012 | 08:13PM
kahuku01 wrote:
Telling someone to move because he gives his opinion. Just move to the windward side or east Honolulu and you won't have to put up with the anti-rail people. How do you like it if someone tells you to move because you don't agree with their opinion. Not too good eh!
on July 31,2012 | 08:00PM
wiliki wrote:
I like all three candidates, but Menor seems to me to be the best choice. He has risked his political career for his personal values. That strikes me as an honest men.
on July 31,2012 | 01:50PM
false wrote:
Ron Menor? You've go to be kidding. Change "personal values" to "personal gain". This, from a longtime Mililani resident.
on July 31,2012 | 03:21PM
wondermn1 wrote:
As a 20 year Mililani resident, I agree with false on this one as well. MENOR DID NOT WORK FOR US BUT FOR HIMSELF.
on July 31,2012 | 05:44PM
aomohoa wrote:
You are only saying that because that would be a useless vote.
on August 1,2012 | 10:09AM
IN OTHER NEWS