Quantcast
  

Wednesday, June 19, 2013         

 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Hannemann, Gabbard vie for votes from Democrats

By Gordon Y.K. Pang

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:42 a.m. HST, Aug 04, 2012



The Democratic race in the 2nd Congressional District is boiling down to whether neighbor island and rural Oahu voters prefer a seasoned politico in former Mayor Mufi Hannemann or the newer face of city Councilwoman and Iraq War veteran Tulsi Gabbard.

Two other candidates have mounted impressive campaigns, but neither Esther Kia­‘aina nor Bob Marx appears to have the resources or time to catch the front-runners.

It's been 26 years since Hannemann first ran for a Hawaii congressional seat, losing to Republican Pat Saiki. Since then he has amassed a wealth of experience and allies as mayor and a city councilman, as well as in various other government and private-sector jobs. No other candidate in the race can match his lengthy résumé.

But Hannemann, 58, has also drawn detractors, including several national organizations that have lined up behind Gabbard to defeat him. Gabbard, at 31, is actually a year younger than Hannemann was when he first made a run at Congress.

A former state legislator — Hawaii's youngest — and Army Guard captain, she is branding herself as the fresh alternative poised to build up years of seniority in Congress.

Marx, a Hilo attorney, 63, is trying to become the first neighbor islander to hold the seat in a district where more than 60 percent of voters live outside Oahu. Marx spent six years in the Oregon legislature.

Kia‘aina, 49, has spent more than two decades as a congressional aide, including time as a chief of staff to two different congressional members. Unlike Hannemann of Aiea and Gabbard of Hono­lulu, Kia­‘aina lives within the district — in Nana­kuli.

The winner of the Aug. 11 Demo­cratic primary will be a heavy favorite to win the seat in November.

The latest Hawaii Poll shows Gabbard has gained huge support in the past six months. In February, Hannemann held a 65 percent to 20 percent lead in a head-to-head matchup, a 45 percentage-point margin. In July's four-person poll that included Kia­‘aina and Marx, Hannemann's lead over Gabbard had dwindled to 43 percent to 33 percent, a difference of only 10 percentage points. Kia­‘aina and Marx were far behind.

From the outset, the Gabbard camp has regarded name recognition as its greatest challenge. The latest Hawaii Poll results indicate she managed to overcome that, turning what was an 18 percent favorable rating in February into a 46 percent rating in July.

A large and steady stream of advertising and the funding used to pay for that advertising have played a key role in her rise in recognition.

Gabbard has raised about $1 million overall, nearly keeping pace with Hannemann, who has raised about $1.2 million. She has out-raised the former mayor during the last two reporting periods.

Hannemann's campaign argues that Gabbard has additionally benefited from nearly $500,000 in advertising from the independent expenditures made by three mainland-based special-interest groups that do not count toward her own campaign's totals and are not bound by how much they can contribute.

According to Federal Election Commission records, VoteVets.Org Action Fund has contributed $269,577 in support of Gabbard's candidacy, while Women Vote! — an offshoot of the pro-choice organization Emily's List — contributed $128,720, and Sierra Club Independent Action has chipped in $58,069.

The Hannemann campaign said the advertisements offer "falsehoods and half-truths" in attacking the record of its candidate.

The Sierra Club has set up a website, mufis­record.org, which seeks to discredit his environmental record.

On the issue of curbside recycling, the Sierra Club said Hannemann was opposed to curbside recycling until a City Charter amendment approved by the voters forced him to do it. The Hannemann forces, on a blog on his website titled "Fact vs. Fiction — the Sierra Club edition," said their candidate should be credited with persuading the United Public Workers union to go along with islandwide curbside recycling.

In 2005, Hannemann did cancel a curbside recycling contract due to delays caused by a protest to the contract, and the pilot program did not begin until September 2007, after voters in November 2006 approved a charter amendment making curbside recycling a mandate for the Department of Environmental Services.

But there is no evidence that Hannemann flatly opposed curbside recycling. And some third-party, longtime city observers noted that not only did he negotiate an agreement with UPW that led to islandwide recycling, the Hannemann administration took other steps toward green- and white-waste recycling at schools and businesses before the pilot project got under way.

The Hannemann campaign has not specifically questioned any of the advertising by the veterans or pro-choice organizations and declined to do so when asked.

The Gabbard campaign has filed a complaint asking the Federal Election Commission to look into whether Hannemann should have reported trips he took and other public exposure opportunities he received in his capacity as chairman of the Hawai‘i Hotel and Lodging Association as campaign contributions. Hannemann's camp has said he's done everything by the book.

The Sierra Club and the Gabbard campaign have also accused Hannemann in both broadcast and print ads of obtaining a bulk of his funding from corporate interests and practicing a "pay to play" culture tying contracts with political contributions.

The Hannemann campaign said in response: "The State Procurement Office conducted an audit with a sampling of 84 professional service contracts that were awarded by the Hannemann Administration, and after careful review, that office issued the Hannemann Administration a clean bill of health."

Hannemann has repeatedly emphasized his years of experience as the biggest reason voters should choose him.

"We need to send someone who has proven experience in Washington, D.C., and a track record of getting results," Hannemann said, particularly with programs from Social Security to Medicare being threatened, and the loss of 36 years of veteran experience with the retirement of U.S. Sen. Daniel Akaka.

Gabbard, meanwhile, is urging voters to view her as representing a new generation of leadership.

"I felt a clear frustration from voters that many in Congress are not serving those who sent them there," Gabbard said. "I feel a responsibility to bring that focus back to serving the people."

Among the remaining candidates, Kia­‘aina has impressed observers during debates with her knowledge of the issues. Her experience on Capitol Hill is greater than that of anyone else seeking the seat.

Kia‘aina, too, faced the challenge of name recognition, but has benefited from a series of ads and several televised debates.

Kia‘aina is known for her work on the Akaka Bill, which provides a path for Native Hawaiians to gain federal recognition, as well as the 1993 Apology Resolution, which recognized the U.S. role in the overthrow of the Hawaiian government and called for reconciliation between the U.S. government and Native Hawaiians. Most recently she was the chief advocate for the Office of Hawaiian Affairs.

Marx believes his six years as an Oregon legislator and several decades as a experienced negotiator while representing clients as an attorney bring the best set of skills for the next 2nd District representative.

Marx also sees as a priority the need to help farmers and other rural community constituents with subsidies and other programs to address such core issues as fresh drinking water and irrigation systems. Urban Oahu residents like Hannemann and Gabbard take things like sewer, water and electrical systems for granted, he said.

"When you get to the rural areas, in the 2nd District, we don't have the basic things."

Attorney Rafael Del Castillo, 64, has made the rights of medical patients his top priority. Del Castillo, a Hawaii Kai resident, said he "deals with working people in the working world" and has not spent years in the jaded confines of government. He said he's a skilled negotiator but can be tough when it's necessary.

The Affordable Health Care Act that is closely associated with President Barack Obama provides "a real skeleton for bringing runaway health care costs under control" but is only a first step, Del Castillo said. "There's insufficient funding to fully implement it."

Longtime Kaneohe resident Miles Shi­ra­tori, 59, is a financial adviser who "had to spend money wisely" for approximately 50,000 clients over the years and says he will be able to quickly gain a firm grasp on financial matters in Congress.

Shiratori said his priorities include providing more funding for education and giving additional tax credits and other incentives to small businesses and middle-class families.

The Republican candidates are self-employed handyman/house painter David Kawika Crowley of Hilo and small-businessman/consultant Matthew DiGeronimo of Hawaii Kai.





More From The Star-Advertiser

Gabbard triumphs




 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
999
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have read and agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. Any violations of these terms may result in account suspension or deactivation. Please keep your comments civil and in good taste. To report a comment, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
MalamaKaAina wrote:
ANYBODY BUT MUFI!!!
on August 3,2012 | 01:44AM
Skyler wrote:
I was watching the Kauai debate the other night and when Tulsi brought up Mufi's pay to play, he was really nervous and saying stuff like "nobody's gone to jail", etc. I think this is exactly the problem - politicians like Mufi who will do whatever they can get away with, rather than actually trying to do the right thing. Politicians MAKE the laws so of course they can find ways around the spirit and intent of the laws if they want to exploit the situation for their own self interest and that of their cronies. Mufi VETOED the conflict of interest bill that Council passed to try to clean up the shady rail contracts that were going on when he was Mayor.
on August 3,2012 | 01:57AM
wh55 wrote:
MUFI's biggest problem is MUFI. His ego and ambition just cause him to do corrupt things and push people around - you do that often enough and people aren't going to give you a pass. That why Hanabusa said he uses "bully tactics", why Ann Kobayashi also called him a bully, Cayetano called him "ruthless" and Ed Case said he "governed by fear and intimidation." They can't all have it wrong. You pair that with all the shady backroom deals and what do you have - a corrupt politician who will do whatever he wants if he thinks it benefits his own agenda. That's just what we DON'T need in Congress.
on August 3,2012 | 02:12AM
pikake888 wrote:
I've met Tulsi and she is very refreshing and inspiring - I saw that almost of her campaign donations have been small individual contributions of $100 or under. This shows how much she has impressed so many people as a leader who will truly represent the people of Hawaii. The fact that she is showing so strongly against Mufi also says a lot about how people feel about him.
on August 3,2012 | 04:26AM
jusmetwocents wrote:
My vote goes to Tulsi... Mufi is a criminal!
on August 3,2012 | 07:41AM
islandhula wrote:
My vote is for Tulsi too!
on August 3,2012 | 08:33AM
Forever_Grateful wrote:
Mine is for Tulsi too! I will never forgive or forget what Mufi did to the elderly Kalihi residents. When he existed office as Mayor to run for Governor, he very abruptly changed the zoning from residential to commerical which in turned raised their property taxes sky high. Most of those elderly folks I see every day are not only on a very fixed income but the taxes rose higher than most bring in a a year or close to it. That was very sneaky of him !! And lest we forget his classless, petty flyer comparing him to Abercrombie that hit our mail boxes. Do we really want him representing Hawaii people in DC? Not me!!
on August 3,2012 | 01:58PM
JoeKane wrote:
Tulsi has real aloha and that's what we need in Congress. Our most effective Congress members are those that have aloha, like Patsy Mink did and Senator Akaka has.
on August 3,2012 | 06:40AM
LanaAloha wrote:
I would be so embarrassed for Hawaii if Mufi went to Congress.
on August 3,2012 | 09:43AM
Forever_Grateful wrote:
I AGREE !!!
on August 3,2012 | 01:58PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Tulsi is a crafty politician too! She goes to enlist in National guards, runs for Council person under the name Tamayo, using that Japanese name for recognition, is only one term in council, then jumps to Washington! How power hungry is that! Her commercial sounds like a easy checklist she can accomplish if elected. So much promises, oh and I will fight for you ,the kupunas, of my Hawaii nei.
on August 3,2012 | 02:28PM
Jsato wrote:
I think the politicians who engage in pay to play SHOULD go to jail. That would help stop some of this cr*p. Otherwise they just keep doing it until they get voted out. Retire Mufi!
on August 3,2012 | 04:58AM
LanaAloha wrote:
I agree - like Tulsi said she would go after the Wall Street crooks to prosecute those that ripped off so many people with their schemes; people lost their homes, their retirement accounts, their jobs - everything. They deserve prison not a few new regulations that they wiggle their way around!
on August 3,2012 | 09:48AM
KeithHaugen wrote:
Tulsi could surge ahead in the polls if she would stand up for the people and oppose the ill-conceived Kapolei railroad, which a majority of voter do not want and blame on Hannemann, who is leading in the race for a House seat. They must have some kind of a "gentleman's/gentlewoman's" agreement, since neither seems willing to address that most important issue.
on August 3,2012 | 05:55AM
JoeKane wrote:
The rail is Mufi's baby and the mayor's race will decide the outcome on rail, which is correct. In the meantime, Tulsi pushed for the HART audit that got rid of the some of the million$ wasted in PR money on Mufi's friends at Lychee. Her main focus in Congress won't be rail - it will be other national issues like rebuilding the economy, getting troops out of Afghanistan, cutting waste and corruption, etc.
on August 3,2012 | 06:47AM
false wrote:
One only problem with this is that while on the Council, she voted favorably on 52 rail related issues. Given the SA polls this clearly showed that she voted against the wishes of her constituency 52 times. One vote was "with reservations"...
on August 3,2012 | 08:13AM
LanaAloha wrote:
The "reservations" vote was because if she DIDN'T vote yes, then Hawaii's taxpayers would have no chance of getting the $1.5 billion in federal money and Carlisle said the rail would go forward with or without the money. If we don't get the federal money, then the bill is null and void. If you don't want rail, then vote Ben! That will decide the fate of rail.
on August 3,2012 | 09:50AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
False hope, Ben cannot and will not stop Rail.
on August 3,2012 | 02:29PM
PCWarrior wrote:
Watch and learn NoLiveNanakuli.
on August 3,2012 | 04:03PM
Kalaheo1 wrote:
NanakuliBoss wrote: "Ben cannot and will not stop Rail."

You should tell John White and PRP that. He just spent $1,000,000.00 of union members dues trying to keep Ben from getting elected.
on August 3,2012 | 05:36PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Tulsi said she supports the Rail!
on August 3,2012 | 02:28PM
LanaAloha wrote:
She's not pro rail! http://votetulsi.com/rail-issue
on August 3,2012 | 05:18PM
pgkemp wrote:
so true!
on August 3,2012 | 06:52AM
owlright wrote:
I have been following Tulsi’s career, and I feel a deep respect for her commitment to Hawaii. I believe that our state is in need of more clean politicians like Tulsi who fight for what they believe is what's right for our country and our home State. Tulsi has my full support.
on August 3,2012 | 01:47AM
islandhula wrote:
I've been following Tulsi's campaign for a while - it's clear she's the kind of strong leader with real integrity we need in Congress.
on August 3,2012 | 08:35AM
LanaAloha wrote:
Go Tulsi!
on August 3,2012 | 09:51AM
wondermn1 wrote:
Go Kia'aina Go, We need your experience in Congress and do not want MUFI to mess it up. Tulsi is bought and owned by he chamber whereas Kia'aina is at least her own person. Look up her record, just because name recognition is not in place as she is not a grandstander. Go Kia'aina Go You have until November.
on August 3,2012 | 04:04AM
PaiaGirl wrote:
At 7% voting for Kia'aina is throwing away your vote on someone who cannot possibly win. This refusal to see reality on the part of the Kia'aina supporters coupled with their decision to back Mufi and do his dirty work by negatively campaigning against Tulsi Gabbard has Kia'aina's formerly spotless reputation in shreds.
on August 3,2012 | 05:30AM
islandhula wrote:
I agree. It doesn't make any sense.
on August 3,2012 | 08:36AM
Lanikaula wrote:
"Among the remaining candidates, Kia­‘aina has impressed observers during debates with her knowledge of the issues. Her experience on Capitol Hill is greater than that of anyone else seeking the seat." Tulsi has NO EXPERIENCE...period! Fresh ain't necessarily better. they're going to eat her up in Congress! What do anyone thinks about someone who asks the other, as Tulsi did, to step down so she can win as that's what she did to Kia'aina? U want someone who knows the ways of the "pu'u 'iole'...da 'hill rats.'
on August 3,2012 | 09:52AM
sccoutt wrote:
That's kind of what I've been worried about, regarding Tulsi- "fresh ain't necessarily better." Her lack of Capitol Hill experience worries me. I haven't decided who to vote for amongst the 3, but Kia'aina might be getting a second look from me.
on August 3,2012 | 01:02PM
KeithHaugen wrote:
As usual,it is sad that the news media picks those who think should be the frontrunners and eventually win. If the had given Kia`aina the same exposure they have given to Gabbard and Hannemann, we'd be looking at a Hawaiian frontrunnner in that race.
on August 3,2012 | 05:57AM
Jsato wrote:
Tulsi's support isn't from the media - it's obvious she has a huge grassroots swell of support; volunteers, sign wavers, sign waver, etc. Most of the media coverage favors Hannemann. That momentum that Tulsi has built is what has caused the media to start to show some interest. I've actually been surprised by how much coverage Marx and Kiaiana have received despite their lack of momentum or significant support.
on August 3,2012 | 06:33AM
Yoshi41 wrote:
True - I've seen tons of volunteers out supporting Tulsi. Many people I know personally have started supporting her over the past few months.
on August 3,2012 | 08:13AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Besides that Tulsi has a huge $hi load of money from the mainland. Who are these donors?
on August 3,2012 | 02:32PM
Kuhio_ wrote:
agreed! Support Esther everyone, she's the right choice. Check out this video she just released, it talks about who she is and why she's running http://youtu.be/Si_BvKc_bmA
on August 3,2012 | 06:03AM
JJMoore wrote:
I don't understand why someone would want to waste their vote on someone who doesn't have a chance of winning. Our future is at stake. Mufi's campaign has actually promoted Esther, hoping to split the vote - which is his main chance for winning.
on August 3,2012 | 07:15AM
keight wrote:
Have you forgotten that it's a democracy? We have the right to vote for who we want ... not who you tell us to vote for.
on August 3,2012 | 02:12PM
LanaAloha wrote:
Of course you can vote for who you want, but most people want to vote for someone who can win.
on August 3,2012 | 05:22PM
loquaciousone wrote:
Mufi Hanneman can't finish what he starts. Do you really want him to start another office and then quit and cost taxpayers millions for a special election -- AGAIN? He left taxpayers holding the $6 billion dollar rail bag and now wants to move on to bigger and better things.
on August 3,2012 | 04:13AM
MalamaKaAina wrote:
ANYBODY BUT MUFI!
on August 3,2012 | 04:34AM
Jsato wrote:
RETIRE MUFI!
on August 3,2012 | 04:59AM
pikake888 wrote:
I think many people agree with you - you just get the feeling he doesn't value our money. It's not important to him.
on August 3,2012 | 04:41AM
Forever_Grateful wrote:
Have you taken notice to Mufi's signs - it just says Mufi with his picture and faux smile. His signs don not state what he is running for. That is so he can re-use the signs to run for another office when he bails out. Saves campaign $$
on August 3,2012 | 02:04PM
Kawipoo wrote:
Mufi is a POS.
on August 3,2012 | 04:27AM
Jsato wrote:
True. We need to say Goodbye to Mufi's dirty politics.
on August 3,2012 | 05:06AM
PaiaGirl wrote:
"Pro-Life" organizations? Oops! BIG MISTAKE in reporting. "Mainland groups" another BIG MISTAKE in reporting -- the Sierra Club HAWAII chapter has the PAC which is advertising in favor of Tulsi Gabbard. These are two egregious errors that should be immediately corrected.
on August 3,2012 | 05:28AM
Jsato wrote:
I saw that "pro-life" mistake - do you think it was really a mistake? I don't see how that could get by a basic proofread. SA is so suss when they already endorsed Mufi.
on August 3,2012 | 05:48AM
Kuhio_ wrote:
You are wrong. Do research.
on August 3,2012 | 05:53AM
PaiaGirl wrote:
The Sierra Club is an exceedingly careful and accurate organization. No statement goes out of it that hasn't been checked, double-checked and validated with evidence. Mufi can make up all the excuses he wants but the information on http://MufisRecord.org is accurate. Why on earth would the Country's largest environmental organization go after a candidate who wasn't doing bad things to the environment - it simply doesn't make sense the way Mufi's telling it. Same thing with Emily's List (a pro-CHOICE organization) They may endorse a candidate but they don't spend the way they are doing against Mufi if we women weren't really, really worried about his statements indicating he believes abortion can be banned at the State level. These two organizations are in it because they believe that Mufi's positions are SO BAD, that it is imperative that Tulsi Gabbard beat him. Tulsi Gabbard had an impecable record on the environment while at the same time a great record on small, local business. She supports choice. AND she's the ONLY candidate with a chance of beating Mufi. I implore those of you thinking of voting for the other two candidates who are at 7% -- don't throw your vote away and give the election to Mufi. Please vote for Tulsi Gabbard.
on August 3,2012 | 05:41AM
hukihei wrote:
It's the Gabbard contributors that are of concern. Tulsi at 31 years is still being financed by her father's friends. She has years to go in separating herself from parental baggage and familial mindset.
on August 3,2012 | 06:17AM
JJMoore wrote:
Huh? Tulsi's donations are from people of every walk of life - small donations from people who want to have someone who will represent them in Congress. All different types of people are supporting her because the main thing for Congress is voters want someone who they like and trust. From the polls, it's clear the more people that get to know Tulsi, the more people like her. I know many people who previously were undecided but are voting for Tulsi once they learned more about her record and experience: http://www.votetulsi.com.
on August 3,2012 | 07:08AM
false wrote:
What about the fact that Akaka and his machine have been backing her?
on August 3,2012 | 08:15AM
LanaAloha wrote:
I like Senator Akaka.
on August 3,2012 | 08:53AM
livinginhawaii wrote:
I do too. Its just that all these people who think that her father is orchestrating and funding everything are ignorant.
on August 3,2012 | 05:11PM
Keith_Rollman wrote:
Your comment about the Hawaii Sierra Club is total fiction. In my opinion they are a politically motivated gaggle of money grubbing lawyers with little real concern for the environment. There negative hit site on Hannemann is total rubbish.
on August 3,2012 | 10:52AM
mitt_grund wrote:
Mufi's commercials try to play down his greatest negative - his overriding arrogance. He is depicted as solicitous, friendly and genuinely caring. "I humbly ask your support", he says. True, he stands "head and shoulder" above any other candidate, but that is only a matter of height, There is nothing humble about the man. Once a bully, always a bully. Just watch what happens after he wins. The true Mufi will out.
on August 3,2012 | 05:52AM
loquaciousone wrote:
Don't you just love when politicians use words like humbly? There is no such thing as a humble politician -- on narcissitic ones.
on August 3,2012 | 10:26AM
Hank13 wrote:
mufi's "years of experience" is exactly why he SHOULD NOT be elected. Washington needs new faces with new ideas. Years of experience got us where we are at.
on August 3,2012 | 06:03AM
paradisetax wrote:
Terrific politician, terrible statesman.
on August 3,2012 | 06:40AM
flying1431 wrote:
What accomplishment has Tusli done to merit higher office? Nothing! She passed a bill that saved lunch trucks but that is about it. She is doing this well because she is running on a message of nothing just Hi, I am a pretty face, served in the war so please vote for me and because Muif has had so many detractors and negatives over the years its all coming back against him now. Yes, Mufi does have his warts but at least he has the experience that we need in a time like this.
on August 3,2012 | 06:48AM
pgkemp wrote:
yeah, negative experience...muffy the hothead.....
on August 3,2012 | 06:55AM
Yoshi41 wrote:
Mufi has the WRONG kind of experience trying to run people over and screwing things up. Remember the whole Ala Wai sewage disaster? And then instead of implementing HIS OWN PLAN to fix the sewer system he decided to FIGHT the EPA (with mainland lawyers) and we got stuck with a $1.2 billion dollar lawsuit. What kind of insanity is this? Mufi likes ordering people and pushing them around - everyone who works with him complains how he tries to bully people and use personal attacks. That's not going to work in Congress with 400 plus others members of Congress. He simply can't be effective in Congress - if he gets anything done, it will be for his corporate cronies because that's who he's been working for right through this election.
on August 3,2012 | 08:22AM
Lanikaula wrote:
Dat's Y...vote: Esther KIA'AINA1
on August 3,2012 | 10:08AM
JJMoore wrote:
That's simply not true - she has forcefully called for the withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, development of renewable energy, repeal of DOMA and sponsoring the Respect for Marriage Act, labeling of GMOs, etc. Mufi's political weakness is because of his own actions. Tulsi is for small businesses and cutting waste and corruption - which is the real reason why our economy hasn't been able to strongly recover. All the inside deals between Washington and Wall Street are what's hurting everyone else.
on August 3,2012 | 07:12AM
popoki wrote:
There's a big difference between making promises and actually doing things. So far, she's talked the talk, but has done nothing to walk the walk.
on August 3,2012 | 07:24AM
Yoshi41 wrote:
Exactly - if she gets elected to Congress she can actually make progress on those issues which is the whole reason why we need her there!
on August 3,2012 | 08:24AM
LanaAloha wrote:
Yes let's get Tulsi in Congress so we can get some real work done to help the people of Hawaii!
on August 3,2012 | 09:58AM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Tulsi has never said she was Samoan...
on August 3,2012 | 02:35PM
KING_CRABBE wrote:
flying...............ah, dont think so. You must be a mufi ite. can-can? no can, vote Tulsi, be sure now..........
on August 3,2012 | 05:08PM
Denominator wrote:
Go Mufi! Go AWAY!
on August 3,2012 | 07:04AM
ready2go wrote:
We need a fresh beginning to represent Hawaii in Congress. Articulate, war veteran, intelligient and great character. Go Tulsi, Go!
on August 3,2012 | 07:05AM
McCully wrote:
Congress needs Tulsi, not Mufi the gorilla.
on August 3,2012 | 07:14AM
Kawipoo wrote:
You are to kind. He is Godzilla.
on August 3,2012 | 05:31PM
808Cindy wrote:
Ester Kia'aina is the right way to go. I'm voting for her!
on August 3,2012 | 07:36AM
dhclinton wrote:
anybody but the bully.......go get a real job hannemann
on August 3,2012 | 07:44AM
Macadamiamac wrote:
Tulsi's too young. Mufi & Marx too old. Esther's just right. Vote for Esther! (Signed Goldilocks)
on August 3,2012 | 07:50AM
LanaAloha wrote:
Too young? Both Senator Akaka and Patsy Mink were elected to Congress in their 30s. We need to vote for integrity and leadership, not age. I'll be voting for Tulsi!
on August 3,2012 | 09:57AM
loquaciousone wrote:
Me thinks Macnut is too young to vote.
on August 3,2012 | 10:27AM
Lanikaula wrote:
Dat's Y...vote: Esther KIA'AINA
on August 3,2012 | 10:09AM
mcc wrote:
I hope voters remember the bullying and lies Mufi fed us when he was Mayor. He rammed that useless rail down our throats and now is not talking about it. My vote goes for Tulsi!
on August 3,2012 | 08:07AM
KING_CRABBE wrote:
mufi has been seasoned by the wrong people, enough already, VOTE TULSI for our keiki and a BETTER HAWAII, VOTE TULSI
on August 3,2012 | 08:37AM
Bean808 wrote:
No doubt the guy is smart. But he is his worst enemy. Poor decisions, controlling, etc, Just look at the people he had around him when the ran for gov. Yadao, Tanaka, etc. and what kind of campaign they put on. "I look like you"! The worst is he along with special interest and his make believe friends missing leading and ramming the rail down Oahu's throats. THe guy HAD so much potential something went wrong big time along the way. He WAS a very likable guy but the power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Too bad.
on August 3,2012 | 11:08AM
Teri_Heede wrote:
Tulsi has a tired refrain..a vote for Esther is a vote for Mufi....that is the best they can do because Tulsi has no qualifications to stand on. She would be an abysmal failure in Congress as far as working for Hawai‘i because she has no knowledge of process and procedure in DC, She has NEVER moved legislation through and really will be dependent (admittedly) on her staff. I am not voting for staff. She needs experience. Mufi is Mufi. We all know him. You don't want Mufi...vote for Esther. That will prove you did your homework as a voter and are making an informed, thoughtful decision.
on August 3,2012 | 08:40AM
DowntownGreen wrote:
And will continue to split the anti-Mufi vote and get him elected.
on August 3,2012 | 09:04AM
LanaAloha wrote:
I wouldn't want that on my conscience - helping Mufi get elected.
on August 3,2012 | 09:52AM
Rocket wrote:
Ester and marx have no chance. This democrat is not sending someone to washington dc so he (MUFI) can vote against all of our platform issues like women's rights and gay rights. Tulsi is the choice. Sorry ester, but you should have worked harder to mount a campaign that demonstrated your ability to organize and communicate with voters, otherwise she seems a bit lazy to me based on the campaign she mounted.
on August 3,2012 | 08:45AM
Teri_Heede wrote:
not lazy. not at all. Tulsi AVOIDED public debates with Esther like the plague. You can't compare energy expended on the campaign to Tulsi because you would have to give credit where credit is due...more to Tulsi's parents then Tulsi for campaigning and fund raising. They did the heavy lifting.
on August 3,2012 | 09:12AM
Brian_De_Lima wrote:
You have no clue on the grassroots efforts on each of the islands that real people are volunteering and working for Tulsi. You dismiss the thousands of citizen volunteers supporting Tulsi. Unfortunately, your candidate has been unable to mount a credible campaign. Look at her campaign spending report, she paid thiusands for strategy consultants, a campaign chair and she had so little money. The ability to pull talented people together, Make timely decisions, and inspire your workers is what a leader does. Esther is a fine person but this is not her election, she and Marx cannot win. So let's support Tulsi that is the only logical vote to ensure a progressive vote in congress from District 2.
on August 3,2012 | 10:29PM
LanaAloha wrote:
Tulsi has run an incredible campaign - the reason so many people are willing to work so hard to get Tulsi elected is because she gives up hope we can have real change and real progress in Washington! Kudos to everyone who has helped on Tulsi's campaign - Mufi's running scared and he needs to retire from Hawaii politics for good!
on August 3,2012 | 09:55AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Mormon versus Hindu for the gold medal of Hawaii politics. Is this a great country or what?
on August 3,2012 | 09:05AM
Teri_Heede wrote:
and neither concerned with civil rights. Tulsi's recent rhetoric is just that.
on August 3,2012 | 09:14AM
Lanikaula wrote:
Dat's Y...vote: Esther KIA'AINA
on August 3,2012 | 10:10AM
Changalang wrote:
100%
on August 3,2012 | 05:22PM
colching wrote:
Give me a break! Mufi faces prejudice every day of his life and has had to do so his entire life. When you're a tall Samoan, you are stereo-typed, which is why so may people say such nasty, personal things about him. But he is not wealthy, he has given up higher paying jobs for government service, quietly uses his own funds to offer scholarships and opportunities for Hawaii"s youth, and is not afraid to make the tough decisions, even at personal peril. This is what a leader is supposed to be like. The haters can say what they like, but Mufi is a good man. He has always been a good person, good morals, good ethics, cares about people. He did such a good job as mayor that Mayor Carlisle has retained most of Mufi's cabinet and acknowledges the solid economic condition the city is in as he took office.The anti-Mufi rants do not hold water to the facts. he left the city in better condition than he found it. No brag, just facts!
on August 3,2012 | 07:58PM
4EwaLocal wrote:
It is a great country precisely because it is a country with freedoms including the freedom of religion we have. No one should dictate how anyone worships. Which religion a particular candidate follows should play no role in determining candidacy worthiness. It should not have been an issue when considering John F. Kennedy, it should not be an issue when considering Barrack Obama, it should not be an issue when considering Mitt Romney, and it should not be an issue when considering the Hawaii candidates for congress either!
on August 3,2012 | 03:26PM
WesleySMori wrote:
Amen LUCKY CAT!!!!! "AMEN"!!!!!! "GOD BLESS HAWAII & AMERICA"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
on August 3,2012 | 05:27PM
PMiller4249 wrote:
Know this is wrong place to comment but cartoon in today's paper depicting Romney as an amateur is an obnoxious and a blatant advance endorsement of Obama! Not sure whether it push or plain indoctrination. It would be difficult to show in one cartoon, Obama's amateurish incompetency over 4 yrs, his lies; his behavior unbefitting the Presidency; his unfulfilled promises; and desire to socially change America by issuing EO's rather than legislation. Suggest Paper clearly endorse Obama now, instead of waiting, and change paper's name to "Democratic Advertiser"! Obviously Paper is in pocket of the monied, labor and the Party!
on August 3,2012 | 09:55AM
PMA wrote:
It's obvious beyond a doubt that the SA is a complicit rag monopoly capable of controlling content towards its ideology without repudiation...in this case the ideological theme to keep the power brokers in play and the taxpayers on the hook.  Fortunately, there are online sources for objective viewpoints at our disposal...if you are mindful enough to look for them.
on August 3,2012 | 11:52AM
kauaiguy wrote:
Mufi is a very caring and educated man who will do much for Hawaii in Washington...........wake up Tulsi supporters, do you have any PROOF or CONVICTION of any Mufi wrongdoing??..........Absolutely none because there is none.........when you are the mayor of the 13th largest city in the nation, you always gotta put up w/ false accusations and claims, comes w/the job.........Mufi has already been investigated, NOTHING HAS EVER BEEN FOUND!..........again, please show PROOF, don't just accuse!!!
on August 3,2012 | 10:52AM
WesleySMori wrote:
Touche KAUAIGUY!! "TOUCHE"!!! Unfounded "ALLEGATIONS" Are Just That "UNFOUNDED"!!! "GOD BLESS HAWAII & AMERICA"!!!!!!!!!!!!
on August 3,2012 | 12:14PM
KING_CRABBE wrote:
eh Kauai..............part of the shibai train eh? AnyBodyButMufi, VOTE TULSI now, you are as blind as a bat in the day time, please stop misleading the public! mahalo!
on August 3,2012 | 05:26PM
lotstosay wrote:
Do you want Mufi’s outstanding character traits -- gift of gab, untrustworthiness, self-serving, bullish ways, a scammer and who believes his brown skin and Harvard education is superior to white skin and us confused no brainers to replace a man like Senator Akaka who is the complete opposite of Mufi Hannemann?
on August 3,2012 | 11:55AM
Kaleo744 wrote:
I already voted 4 E.K.
on August 3,2012 | 01:06PM
environmental_lady wrote:
I'm all for Tulsi Gabbard for all the right reasons. We need to persuade all her friends and neighbors in her district to vote for her. Good luck, Tulsi!
on August 3,2012 | 02:15PM
Kapakahi wrote:
Typo: you may want to edit this sentence:

"The Hannemann campaign has not specifically questioned any of the advertising by the veterans or pro-life organizations and declined to do so when asked."

I think you mean "pro-choice" organizations?
on August 3,2012 | 03:12PM
Changalang wrote:
Tulsi is owned and operated by the Rail Mafia. She was made Rail Princess when she voted to let HART raid the General Fund via defacto contingency legislation that Carlisle signed into law before it settled on his desk. The payback for her betrayal of her district constituency and her roll over vote with reservations is PRP 's support and McCoy's joint steering.
on August 3,2012 | 03:25PM
Changalang wrote:
" t's hard to imagine two commercials in two different major Hawaii campaigns looking and sounding more similar than these two. The Pacific Resource Partnership, which has spent more than $1 million to promote rail and attack mayoral candidate Ben Cayetano this year, released a new spot Thursday that is eerily reminiscent of an ad produced for 2nd Congressional District hopeful Tulsi Gabbard last month. Both commercials are titled "Pay-to-Play." Both commercials feature a faceless man in a dark suit counting off hundred-dollar bills. Both commercials start with the same exact shot of five red casino dice rolling from left to right — though one is over an image of the U.S. Capitol and one is over an image of Honolulu Hale. If they're not created by the same minds, then the new one is some sort of homage to the old one. PRP's commercial even seems to make a verbal reference to Gabbard's spot. So how did the exact same imagery find its way into two different ads? No one will say. " (03AUG2012; CivilBeat)
on August 3,2012 | 03:27PM
LanaAloha wrote:
I can explain EXACTLY how - those LOSERS at PRP ripped off Tulsi's ad! Of course Mufi's their rail boy so they have no problem just completely swiping her awesome ad - which talked about the need to get rid of "pay to play" in Washington.
on August 3,2012 | 04:53PM
Changalang wrote:
No more lies from you.
on August 3,2012 | 05:09PM
Changalang wrote:
It is just like the Rick Reed/Chris Butler cult.
on August 3,2012 | 05:17PM
Changalang wrote:
" Gabbard spokesman Jim McCoy said, however, that Gabbard’s polls show her in the lead and with the momentum. " (10JUL2012; Star Advertiser).................... " Jim McCoy, a spokesman for the campaign of Councilwoman Tulsi Gabbard, who is running against Hannemann and others in the 2nd Congressional District Democratic primary, said the Gabbard campaign does not use push polling. " (24JUL2012; Star Advertiser) Didn't PRP pay Tulchin Research for a poll against Cayetano? Why is "a" Jim McCoy the contact person for PRP? Maybe it is a different guy.
on August 3,2012 | 03:47PM
Changalang wrote:
" Tulchin Research recently conducted a survey on behalf of Pacific Resources Partnership (PRP) of likely voters in Honolulu County on the mayoral primary race as well as voters’ attitudes toward rail transit".....Check it for yourself. Why is Tulsi Gabbard's spokesperson the contact person for the poll conducted by Tulchin Reasearch. Give him a call and ask him. Scroll down to the bottom of the .pdf provided at the link..... http://www.tulchinresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Poll-results-memo-Honolulu-Mayors-race-5-12.pdf.... Connect the dots, Oahu. A vote for Tulsi is a vote against Cayetano; Hawaii GOP geniuses. LOL.
on August 3,2012 | 04:02PM
WesleySMori wrote:
Touche CHANGALANG!! "TOUCHE"!!! Just Came Fron The Website YOU Gave And This IS A QUOTE From "TULCHINRESEARCH: "Tulchin Research is working with PRP to build up support for rail on Oahu and oppose Ben Cayetano's anti- rail candidacy for mayor". "GOD BLESS HAWAII & AMERICA"!!!!!!!!!!!
on August 3,2012 | 06:14PM
LanaAloha wrote:
I'm so sick of Mufi's Republican buddies doing their last minute smears on Tulsi in their emails and blogs, trying to trash her. It completely reminds me of Keith Rollman's MO in Hannemann's campaign against Abercrombie. We know they want Mufi in to fulfill their Republican agenda.
on August 3,2012 | 05:08PM
Changalang wrote:
Are you really this mysterious Jim McCoy; spokesman for Tulsi and PRP ? Tulsi voted for the Rail Mafia raiding 450 million dollars of Honolulu's sewer settlement money and is a back door bill to raid the General Fund "with reservations". Let me guess, that wasn;t Tulsi voting, that was just Mufi in a Tulsi suit. Give it up you pack of Rail thieves.
on August 3,2012 | 05:12PM
Changalang wrote:
A vote for Tulsi, is a vote for PRP and AGAINST BEN ! Lying sacks of 5h!t.
on August 3,2012 | 05:20PM
Changalang wrote:
Vote for the honest Hawaiian in this race. Vote Auntie Esther !
on August 3,2012 | 05:20PM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
One angle that is interesting to me is the difference between Tualsi and Mufster in regard to the application of social media to the campaign. This is a generational sort of thing. Mufster knows The Twitter and The Facebook and maybe still mourns The Myspace but he doesn't embrace the technology. Tulasi has a hard core group of social media activists on this and other forums all madly spreading the love and gospel of Tulasi along with a modicum of Mufi Mockery.

Cult versus Codger. It's intriguing. Is this the election where social media actually produces votes? Or will the Tulasi cultists fail to show at the polls? Will the old guard supporters of the tall man actually show up on election and and sweep the prize? So far the conversion rate from social media to actual voting is weak. I guess we will see, eh?


on August 3,2012 | 05:29PM
Changalang wrote:
The Old Guard is supporting the new Rail Princess. Don't sell out.
on August 3,2012 | 06:07PM
mililanihi wrote:
No one except Ben and a few will bring up the issue of rail because every prorail politician knows; this is a poison pill that will only lose them votes. Not a word said how great rail will be in any of those campaign brochures. Goes to show you how corrupt and flawed this project is and they know it. The public has caught on and will not be taken to the cleaners this time around. PRP' and prorail are desperately trying to stop this sinking train from going under and will be running those pilau mainland style advertisements whcih only intensifies the prorail movement. Wasn't rail approved? Didn't we already start and continue to build ? Goes to show you how obvious of a money grab this dumpster fire has become. No shame. Ben has nothing to lose and is exposing the truth on how this will affect our future and the finances of our city. If we go bankrupt, public unions will have to give up or renegotiate pension benefits, contracts and what have you. All because of a greedy few? Go out and vote your say. As for this race, not much to choose from. Anyone prorail is suspect.
on August 3,2012 | 05:24PM
mililanihi wrote:
No one except Ben and a few will bring up the issue of rail because every prorail politician knows; this is a poison pill that will only lose them votes. Not a word said how great rail will be in any of those campaign brochures. Goes to show you how corrupt and flawed this project is and they know it. The public has caught on and will not be taken to the cleaners this time around. PRP' and prorail are desperately trying to stop this sinking train from going under and will be running those pilau mainland style advertisements whcih only intensifies the antirail movement. Wasn't rail approved? Didn't we already start and continue to build ? Goes to show you how obvious of a money grab this dumpster fire has become. No shame. Ben has nothing to lose and is exposing the truth on how this will affect our future and the finances of our city. If we go bankrupt, public unions will have to give up or renegotiate pension benefits, contracts and what have you. All because of a greedy few? Go out and vote your say. As for this race, not much to choose from. Anyone prorail is suspect
on August 3,2012 | 09:11PM
niimi wrote:
If anyone on Mufi's side talks about inexperience, well Mufi forgets that he ran for Congress...when he was 32 years old. Tulsi would have had more political experience had she not reupped to serve in the Persian Gulf. I'm grateful to anyone who puts their life on the line to defend our freedom. Mufi is an old Geezer now. Put Tulsi in and we have the next Dan Inouye with military ties keeping Pearl Harbor humming.
on August 3,2012 | 11:10PM
Eric_Westerlund wrote:
The Hanneman familiy have always been a prominent presence in our State.I knew Nephi through myt Mother, Mara Mossman, married to the late Dr..Thomas Mossman, and they are a proud, akamai family who care deeply about Hawaii. Mufi Hanneman has been an accomplished mayor and is an honorable man who will represent Hawaii's best interests pm Washing ton D.C When push comes to shove, one must look into the heart and soul of a man, and his intentions for the betterment of our islands,as well as the welfare of all..I feel and believe that Mufi has the qualities needed to look after the best interests of Hawaii Nei. Ouch, politics are so pilau sometimes, yes? The big picture is that everyome vote what they feel in their heart.
on August 6,2012 | 12:27AM
ahonui90 wrote:
Tulsi Gabbard would be better suited as a Librarian! She better pay her dues before she even thinks of planning that trip to D.C. Can't put a puppy in there you need someone that has been through it all. Like I told my coworker put his money where his mouth is cause come August 11th we will be calling him Congressman Hanneman. Boom!
on August 6,2012 | 03:50PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates