The four candidates tout varied levels of experience in trying to win over voters
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Jul 13, 2012
LAST UPDATED: 02:14 a.m. HST, Jul 13, 2012
The four major candidates in the Democratic primary for the 2nd Congressional District exchanged barbs during a feisty 90-minute debate Thursday night that touched on issues from their views on same-sex marriage to their ranges of political experience.
At the end of the debate, all of them said they thought they were able to convince rural Oahu and neighbor island voters that they should be chosen on primary election day, Aug. 11.
City Councilwoman Tulsi Gabbard said her experiences as a war veteran and legislator put her in the best position to serve the district.
Esther Kia‘aina, a veteran congressional aide and Office of Hawaiian Affairs political advocate, said her years in the halls of Capitol Hill makes her most able to hit the ground running in Washington.
|
HAWAIINEWSNOW VIDEO » |
Mufi Hannemann said he was able to separate himself from the pack by reinforcing for voters his record as a former Honolulu mayor, Council member and an official at state and federal levels.
Hilo attorney Bob Marx said he won points by showing that he has more knowledge of financial issues than the other candidates as a former member of the Oregon legislature and a negotiator in legal matters.
The incumbent, Mazie Hirono, is giving up her House post to run for the U.S. Senate seat Daniel Akaka is relinquishing.
One recurring theme during the debate was same-sex marriage.
Gabbard's father, state Sen. Mike Gabbard, successfully led the fight against same-sex marriage in the 1990s. She said she will "fight for equality of all Americans regardless of race, gender, age or sexual orientation" and that she supports President Barack Obama's recent position in favor of marriage equality.
Gabbard said she will work to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act by co-sponsoring the Respect for Marriage Act, which would require the federal government to recognize same-sex marriages.
Gabbard, who once spoke at the Legislature against gay rights, said she formulated her latest position after serving in the Army in Afghanistan.
"I've been through some very unique experiences in my life that have really caused me to stand here today with great conviction that I support marriage equality," Gabbard said. "Serving in the Middle East on two tours caused me to see the harshest impacts, the most negative impacts, of what can happen when you have a government that tries to serve as a so-called moral arbiter for its people."
Hannemann, a devout Mormon, said he is struggling with the same-sex marriage issue "because I have my personal views." He said while he continues to support traditional marriage between a man and a woman, he would be willing to listen to those who want to repeal the Defense of Marriage Act.
Both Kia‘aina and Marx said they would co-sponsor the Respect for Marriage Act. Both criticized Gabbard for changing her position on civil unions and same-sex marriage.
The repeal of the Defense of Marriage Act "is necessary to ensure uniformity across the country," Kia‘aina said.
Marx said he previously supported only civil unions but that he now thinks "separate but equal is not working" and that he supports marriage equality.
GABBARD WENT on the offensive against Hannemann, her biggest opponent in the primary, accusing him of practicing a "play-for-pay" system of distributing contracts while he was mayor from 2004 to 2010. She pointed to articles showing those who contributed to Hannemann's campaigns were apt to win city contracts.
Hannemann flatly denied any impropriety.
"Every contract was handed out through the state procurement system," he said. "We followed the rules. We followed the regulations."
The debate was sponsored by Hawaii News Now and the Honolulu Star-Advertiser.
Under the format, the candidates were able to ask each other questions.
Kia‘aina was asked why she wasn't able to help push through the Akaka Bill, creating a pathway toward federal recognition of Native Hawaiians, despite being an aide to Sen. Akaka and former U.S. Rep. Ed Case.
She responded that a majority of senators supported the Akaka Bill but that in recent years it has been mired in antiquated parliamentary procedures. She said she helped push through legislation fighting brown tree snakes and also the Apology Resolution, recognizing the U.S. role in the overthrow of the Hawaiian monarchy.
Marx was asked about his lack of experience in Hawaii or national politics. He countered that while in the Oregon legislature he was vice chairman of the tax and school finance committee and led a committee on improving the budget process.
"It's been my experience in the legislative process that mostly it's about who gets what, when, where and how," he said.
He said he has spent 32 years as a lawmaker and negotiator, and successfully operated both a law firm and a bookstore.
"I know how to make budgets, and I know about public finance," he said. "I think I can hit the ground running compared to almost any other candidate."
Other candidates in next month's Democratic primary are attorney Rafael Del Castillo of Hawaii Kai and Miles Shiratori of Kaneohe. The two people vying for the 2nd District's Republican nomination are Kawika Crowley of Hilo and Matthew DeGeronimo of Hawaii Kai.
HM: Neal Blaisdell BC: Mayor.
HM: Frank Fasi BC: Mayor.
HM: Eileen Anderson BC: Mayor.
HM: Mufi Hannemann BC: Ed Case got it right: One of the most dangerous politicians there is in Hawai'i. Some of the ruthless things that he does -- run over people, bully people. But smooth, articulate. Incredible. That's what I've concluded about this guy. I see how he's hurt people. The guy's got no class.
HM: Peter Carlisle BC: Friend. I would describe him as a friend. I like Peter. He just hasn't done the job, that's all. Politics is like boxing. When you get into the ring, it's all business.
Trademarked that.
I trademarked that.
Realisticlly, Esther has zero chance though. Zero. She has no high powered supporters, no organization, no resources. She is cursed with a horrid speaking voice and technique. She came across as the "ethnic option" which alienates a lot of the electorate. The killer question was why after 20 years (during which time Esther was working her experience) did the Akaka Bill fail to get traction. She flubbed the answer which should have been easy.
Esther's biggest contribution last night was throwing support to Mufi. His little manipulation technique trapped her into saying kind things about the competition, a fatal error. Say aloha, Esther and thanks for playing.
It pains me to say t because I am not a supporter but realpolitik dictates that the tall guy is actually the best of the bunch - I wish we had a better bunch.
Sorry, but that's the hard facts of the matter. But she does look cute.
Esther: too strident, abrasive voice, too ethnic oriented and experience is as a follower, not leader.
Bob: not relevant, lost in mumbled statistics, too old, "negotiator" experience adds nothing, befuddled
Tulasi: glib, lack of perspective (freshman, minority party, 1 of 435 but shew ill end the war in the 'Stan.) GMAFB Chickadee, dodeges questions, overstates value of military service
Mufiuli: tired, afraid to be himself-trying to be gentle and kind, manipulative even in the debate process, too tall, his record is a curse as much as an advantage
Results: Mufi will win this one. He actually does have specific experience in leadership roles of substance in both public and private sectors. His basically street fight ability is actually to Hawaii's advantage in slugging it our in Congress. Esther and Bob are irrelevant al though Esther actually knows more about the legislative side than anybody. Tulsi is a teflon candidate who epitomizes the "yes with reservations" approach and hedging.
Mufiuli will win this one as much as it grates on me to say it. The others failed mightily in asking the real tough questions to knock him back. Tulsi took a shot with "pay to play" but lacked the one example of proof to make her case.
Teflon Tulsi, in my opinion, missed an opportunity to stand tall (hehe) when she over-sold her military experience and kept suggesting that a freshman House member had significant political clout. Tulasi, darling, you are not going to personally save Medicare, Social Security or stop the war in Afghanistan. You know it; we know it. But you are cute when motivated. I predict the neighborhood board answer will come back to haunt her.
I'm sorry but Bob looked lost in space, over-talked his time limits, made very strange statistical references and basically seemed befuddled. Oh, and Bob - the "Hawaiian is a state of mind card" has been tried by many all have been burnt badly.
So that leaves Mufi. It was his to lose and he almost accomplished that. He lacked energy and spirit and seemed overly concerned with being a nice gentle sort of really, really big dude. I would have though he would come on with confidence but he pushed humility. Still, he made the point that love him or hate him he at least got stuff done.
I think Mufi walks away in the best position - no fatal wounds and his machine has the money and wherewithal to win the vote. Personally that makes me go "yuck" but I am a realist about this stuff.