Thursday, July 10, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Afghan companies with insurgent ties get U.S. contracts despite safeguards


New York Times


WASHINGTON » Facing a well-financed insurgency in Afghanistan, the United States has struggled for years to cut off the main contribution American taxpayers make to Taliban coffers: the hiring of Afghan contractors with ties to the insurgents.

But despite the development of contractor blacklists and other requirements earlier in the war, U.S. investigators have uncovered a new case that casts doubt on the military's ability to weed out suspicious contractors from the thousands who work with the United States to build bases, ship supplies and carry out myriad other tasks.

The case centers on the Zurmat Material Testing Laboratory, part of the Zurmat Group, an Afghan company that the investigators say was paid to do work at an American-controlled facility in November 2012, despite having been blacklisted two months before by one part of the military for providing bomb-making materials to insurgents.

The Zurmat case was outlined in a letter sent last week to Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, an internal government watchdog. A copy of the letter was provided to The .

According to other documents and a review of internal Pentagon communications obtained by The Times, the United States Central Command, which oversees the war in Afghanistan, requested in 2012 that Zurmat and its subsidiaries, along with more than 40 other companies and individuals believed to have ties to insurgents, be "debarred" by the Army. This would formally ban them from doing work for any part of the U.S. government.

At the time, officials estimated that those contractors had collectively been awarded more than $150 million in work for the U.S.-led coalition over a 10-year period.

But the Pentagon officials who rule on suspension and debarment cases have so far refused to issue the bans. In the documents, the officials argue that because the evidence against Zurmat and the other companies and individuals consists largely of classified intelligence, which cannot be shown to the accused contractors, debarment would violate their right to due process.

The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the Zurmat case or the broader dispute over using classified intelligence to ban contractors suspected of supporting insurgents.

Coming after years of mounting concerns about waste and possible misdirection of the billions of dollars in aid and military contracts given throughout the war, the Zurmat case, which has been festering for nearly a year, adds insult to injury in the eyes of some members of Congress. Lawmakers have expressed anger at the Pentagon's refusal to ban contractors suspected of having ties to militants, and they are pressing again to force it to cut off the money.

"It's like we're subsidizing the people who are shooting at our soldiers," said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H.

Zurmat was first blacklisted in April 2012 by the Commerce Department because of accusations that it had helped the feared Haqqani insurgent faction in Afghanistan obtain bomb-making materials. Then, in September of that year, the military's Central Command banned Zurmat from working on contracts within its area of operations, which stretches from the Middle East to Pakistan.

But that order did not automatically result in warnings to other companies that might have been subcontracting work to Zurmat or one of its subsidiaries. Such warnings would only be issued if the company were formally debarred by the Defense Department, according to the special inspector general's letter to Hagel.

As a result, employees at the Zurmat testing laboratory gained access in November 2012 to what was at the time the main U.S.-run prison in Afghanistan, the letter said. Zurmat had been hired to perform safety tests on the construction work done by another contractor, CLC Construction, which was building a courthouse at the prison and had not been informed of the Central Command decision to bar the Afghan firm.

The inspector general said it had uncovered the work done by Zurmat as part of a separate investigation into shoddy construction work at the detention facility, which is adjacent to Bagram Air Base, one of the largest coalition bases in Afghanistan.

"This lapse in security highlights the immediate need for a simple process to ensure that individuals and companies identified as supporters of the insurgency are prevented from accessing U.S.- and coalition-controlled facilities," the inspector general wrote to Hagel.

It is unclear how much Zurmat was paid for its work at the prison, or whether its employees had access to particularly sensitive areas.

It is also unclear whether Zurmat or any of the other companies proposed for debarment are still doing work for the coalition. It is nearly impossible to track subcontracts, officials say, and that has made it very difficult to enforce bans, especially those issued only by one command.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
manakuke wrote:
Oversight monitoring of private businesses in foreign lands is notoriously poor.
on November 13,2013 | 03:30AM
Anonymous wrote:
The current administration has to find ways to funnel money to the muslim brotherhood some how. So, lets use companies with ties to them. Fast and Furious in Afghan.
on November 13,2013 | 05:45AM
Charliegrunt wrote:
We need to change the rules where it takes an Act of God to fire civil servants and political appointees. If these Bozos haven't figured it out yet, the security of our nation takes priority over not firing foreign contractors because they can't be taken to trial because of classified information. The fact that we have proof, even if classified, should suffice. There should be no need to share that classified information.
on November 13,2013 | 08:00AM