Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 17, 2014         

NEW YORK TIMES


 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

For schools, reading remains stumbling block

By MOTOKO RICH

New York Times

POSTED:



TROY, N.Y. » David Javsicas, a popular seventh-grade reading teacher known for urging students to act out dialogue in the books they read in class, sometimes feels wistful for the days when he taught math.

A quiz, he recalls, could quickly determine which concepts students had not yet learned. Then, "you teach the kids how to do it, and within a week or two you can usually fix it," he said.

Helping students to puzzle through different narrative perspectives or subtext or character motivation, though, can be much more challenging. "It could take months to see if what I'm teaching is effective," he said.

Educators, policymakers and business leaders often fret about the state of math education, particularly in comparison with other countries. But reading comprehension may be a larger stumbling block.

At Troy Prep Middle School, a charter school near Albany that caters mostly to low-income students, teachers are finding it easier to help students hit academic targets in math than in reading , an experience repeated in schools across the country.

Students entering the fifth grade at Troy Prep are often several years behind in both subjects, but last year, 100 percent of seventh-graders scored at a level of proficient or advanced on state standardized math tests. In reading, by contrast, just over half of the seventh-graders met comparable standards.

The results are similar across the 31 other schools in the Uncommon Schools network, which enrolls low-income students in Boston; New York City; Rochester, N.Y.; and Newark, N.J. After attending an Uncommon school for two years, said Brett Peiser, the network's chief executive, 90 percent of students score at a proficient or advanced level in math, while just over a third reach those levels in reading over the same period.

"Math is very close-ended," Peiser said. Reading difficulties, he said, tend to be more complicated to resolve.

"Is it a vocabulary issue? A background knowledge issue? A sentence length issue? How dense is the text?" Peiser said, rattling off a string of potential reading roadblocks. "It's a three-dimensional problem that you have to attack. And it just takes time."

Uncommon's experience is not so uncommon. Other charter networks and school districts similarly wrestle to bring struggling readers up to speed while having more success in math.

In a Mathematica Policy Research study of schools run by KIPP, one of the country's best-known charter operators, researchers found that on average, students who had been enrolled in KIPP middle schools for three years had test scores that indicated they were about 11 months - or the equivalent of more than a full grade level - ahead of the national average in math. In reading, KIPP's advantage over the national average was smaller, about eight months.

Among large public urban districts — which typically have large concentrations of poor students — six raised eighth-grade math scores on the federal tests known as the National Assessment of Educational Progress from 2009 to 2011. Only one — in Charlotte, N.C. — was able to do so in reading.

Studies have repeatedly found that "teachers have bigger impacts on math test scores than on English test scores," said Jonah Rockoff, an economist at Columbia Business School, and a co-author of a study that showed that teachers who helped students raise standardized test scores had a lasting effect on those students' future incomes, as well as other lifelong outcomes.

Teachers and administrators who work with children from low-income families say one reason teachers struggle to help these students improve reading comprehension is that deficits start at such a young age: In the 1980s, psychologists Betty Hart and Todd R. Risley found that by the time they are 4 years old, children from poor families hear 32 million fewer words than children with professional parents.

By contrast, children learn math predominantly in school.

"Your mother or father doesn't come up and tuck you in at night and read you equations," said Geoffrey Borman, a professor at the Wisconsin Center for Education Research at the University of Wisconsin. "But parents do read kids bedtime stories, and kids do engage in discussions around literacy, and kids are exposed to literacy in all walks of life outside of school."

Reading also requires background knowledge of cultural, historical and social references. Math is a more universal language of equations and rules.

"Math is really culturally neutral in so many ways," said Scott Shirey, executive director of KIPP Delta Public Schools in Arkansas. "For a child who's had a vast array of experiences around the world, the Pythagorean theorem is just as difficult or daunting as it would be to a child who has led a relatively insular life."

Education experts also say that reading development simply requires that students spend so much more time practicing.

And while reading has been the subject of fierce pedagogical battles, "the ideological divisions are not as great on the math side as they are on the literacy side," said Linda Chen, deputy chief academic officer in the Boston Public Schools. In 2011, 29 percent of eighth-graders eligible for free lunch in Boston scored at proficient or advanced levels on federal math exams, compared with just 17 percent in reading.

At Troy Prep, which is housed in a renovated warehouse, teachers work closely with students to help them overcome difficulties in both math and reading, breaking classes into small groups. But the relative challenges of teaching both subjects were evident on a recent morning.

During a fifth-grade reading class, students read aloud from "Bridge to Terabithia" by Katherine Paterson. Naomi Frame, the teacher, guided the students in a close reading of a few paragraphs. But when she asked them to select which of two descriptions fit Terabithia, the magic kingdom created by the two main characters, the class stumbled to draw inferences from the text.

Later, in math class, the same students had less difficulty following Bridget McElduff as she taught a lesson on adding fractions with different denominators. At the beginning of the class, McElduff rapidly called out equations involving two fractions, and the students eagerly called back the answers.

Because the students were already familiar with the basic principles - finding the greatest common factor, then reducing - they quickly caught on when she asked them to add three fractions.

New curriculum standards known as the Common Core that have been adopted by 45 states and the District of Columbia could raise the bar in math.

"As math has become more about talking, arguing and writing, it's beginning to require these kinds of cultural resources that depend on something besides school," said Deborah L. Ball, dean of the school of education at the University of Michigan.

Teachers and administrators within the Uncommon network are confident that they will eventually crack the nut in reading.

One solution: Get the students earlier. Paul Powell, principal of Troy Prep, said the school, which added kindergarten two years ago and first grade last fall, would add second-, third- and fourth-grade classes over the next three years.

Over time, teachers hope to develop the same results in reading that they have produced in math. Already, students at high school campuses in the Uncommon network in New York City and Newark post average scores on SAT reading tests that exceed the national average for white students.

"I don't think there is very much research out there to say that when you can take a student who is impoverished and dramatically behind, that you can fix it in three years," said Javsicas, the seventh-grade reading teacher who also coordinates special education at Troy Prep. "But I do think the signs seem fairly positive that if we can take kids from kindergarten and take them through 12th grade, I think we can get there."






 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(2)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
jpo wrote:
"Teachers and administrators within the Uncommon network are confident that they will eventually crack the nut in reading." WHAT??? This is total nonsense! It is a shame that today's public schools have to deal with the realities that policymakers, venture capitalists, media and a whole host of wannabe's rejoice in your demise. DEFUND public school education over the the last two decades and you are left with teachers, students, and parents left wondering what happened? Is it because public schools has been described as a $600 billion a year "industry" by Wall Street? When facilities of public schools (ie Farrington) along with overcrowding, hot classrooms, over reliance on testing, narrow curriculum, experienced educators leaving for those with ZERO experience - you end up getting what your getting in public schools. And those groups mentioned above care left celebrating the demise of public school. This article is classic - public schools cant do it (perhaps because of the learning conditions mentioned - hell some of these schools don't even have a librarian or counselors in their schools) but these PRIVATE CORPORATE charter schools can lead the way - THIS IS TOTAL BS! Corporations and the like are tipping their hats, perhaps to say goodbye to public schools but should we really hold out breath from such an honest group that has given us the dot.com and housing bubbles and literally brought the world's financial system down due to its greed. How's our health care cost due to private corporations? What is going on in the corrections department and military due to privatization - should we expect anything different from these institutions? Local public schools will become decimated if this is to occur - especially in Hawaii. We all will fail if this happens. Not sure what can be done about it today - perhaps better journalism and awareness by what we consider news outlets in this state.
on May 30,2013 | 07:46AM
volcanohereicome wrote:
You are 100% correct, but unfortunately, Hawaii is not the only place where public schools are being decimated. After 37 years in public education, I called it quits last year, just for all of the reasons you stated.
on May 30,2013 | 04:39PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates