Sunday, July 27, 2014         


 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Strict Chicago gun laws can't stem fatal shots

By Monica Davey

New York Times


CHICAGO » Not a single gun shop can be found in this city because they are outlawed.

Handguns were banned in Chicago for decades, too, until 2010, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that was going too far, leading city leaders to settle for restrictions some describe as the closest they could get legally to a ban without a ban. Despite a continuing legal fight, Illinois remains the only state in the nation with no provision to let ordinary people carry guns in public.

And yet Chicago, a city with no civilian gun ranges and bans on both assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, finds itself laboring to stem a flood of gun violence that contributed to more than 500 homicides last year and at least 40 killings already in 2013, including a fatal shooting of a 15-year-old girl on Tuesday.

To gun rights advocates, the city provides stark evidence that even some of the toughest restrictions fail to make places safer.

"The gun laws in Chicago only restrict the law-abiding citizens and they've essentially made the citizens prey," said Richard A. Pearson, executive director of the Illinois State Rifle Association.

To gun control proponents, the struggles here underscore the opposite — a need for strict, uniform national gun laws to eliminate the current patchwork of state and local rules thatallow guns to flow into this city fromoutside.

"Chicago is like a house with two parents that may try to have good rules and do what they can, but it's like you've got this single house sitting on a whole block where there's anarchy," said the Rev. Ira J. Acree, one among a group of pastors here who have marched and gathered signatures for an end to so much shooting. "Chicago is an argument for laws that are statewide or, better yet, national."

Chicago's experience reveals the complications inherent in carrying out local gun laws around the nation. Less restrictive laws in neighboring communities and states not only make guns easy to obtain nearby, but layers of differing laws — local and state — make it difficult to police violations.

And though many describe the local and state gun laws here as relatively stringent, penalties for violating them — from jail time to fines — have not proven as severe as they are in some other places, reducing the incentive to comply.

Lately, the police say they are discovering far more guns on the streets of Chicago than in the nation's two more populous cities, Los Angeles and New York. They seized 7,400 guns here in crimes or unpermitted uses last year (compared with 3,285 in New York City), and have confiscated another 574 guns just since Jan. 1 — 124 of them last week alone.

More than a quarter of the firearms seized on the streets here by the Chicago Police Department over the past five years were purchased just outside city limits in Cook County suburbs, according to an analysis by the University of Chicago Crime Lab. Others came from stores around Illinois and from other states, like Indiana, less than an hour's drive away.

Since 2008, more than 1,300 of the confiscated guns, the analysis showed, were purchased from just one store, Chuck's Gun Shop in Riverdale, Ill., within a few miles of Chicago's city limits.

Efforts to compare the strictness of gun laws and the level of violence across major U.S. cities are fraught with contradiction and complication, not least because of varying degrees of coordination between local and state laws and differing levels of enforcement.

In New York City, where homicides and shootings have decreased, the gun laws are generally seen as at least as strict as Chicago's, and the state laws in New York and many of its neighboring states are viewed as still tougher than those in and around Illinois.

Philadelphia, like cities in many states, is limited in writing gun measures that go beyond those set by Pennsylvania law. Some city officials there have chafed under what they see as relatively lax state controls, even as they have wrestled with a stream of homicides.

In Chicago, the rules for owning a handgun — rewritten after the outright ban was deemed too restrictive in 2010 — sound arduous. Owners must seek a Chicago firearms permit, which requires firearms training, a background check and a state-mandated firearm owners identification card, which requires a different background review for felonies and mental illness.

To prevent straw purchasers from selling or giving their weapons to people who would not meet the restrictions — girlfriends buying guns for gang members is a common problem, the police here say — the city requires permitted gun owners to report their weapons lost, sold or stolen.

Still, for all the regulations, the reality here looks different. Some 7,640 people currently hold a firearms permit, but nearly that many illicit weapons were confiscated from the city's streets during last year alone.

Chicago officials say Illinois has no requirement, comparable to Chicago's, that gun owners immediately report their lost or stolen weapons to deter straw purchasers. Consequently those outside the city can, in the words of one city official, carry guns to gang members in the city with "zero accountability."

And a relatively common sentence in state court for gun possession for offenders without other felonies is one year in prison, which really may mean a penalty of six months, said Anita Alvarez, the Cook County state's attorney. She said such punishments failed to serve as a significant enough deterrent for seasoned criminals who may see a modest prison stint as the price of doing business.

"The way the laws are structured facilitates the flow of those guns to hit our streets," Garry F. McCarthy, the Chicago Police superintendent, said in an interview, later adding, "Chicago may have comprehensive gun laws, but they are not strict because the sanctions don't exist."

In the weeks since the mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., Toni Preckwinkle, the Cook County Board president, has introduced a countywide provision requiring gun owners beyond the city limits to report lost or stolen guns, though a first offense would result simply in a $1,000 fine. In the city, Mayor Rahm Emanuel has pressed for increased penalties for those who violate the city's gun ordinance by failing to report their guns missing or possessing an assault weapon.

"Our gun strategy is only as strong as it is comprehensive, and it is constantly being undermined by events and occurrences happening outside the city — gun shows in surrounding counties, weak gun laws in neighboring states like Indiana and the inability to track purchasing" Emanuel said. "This must change."

State lawmakers, too, are soon expected to weigh new state provisions like an assault weapons ban, as Chicago already has. But the fate of the proposals is uncertain in a state with wide-open farming and hunting territory downstate.

"It's going to be a fight," said state Rep. Jack D. Franks, D-Marengo, 60 miles outside Chicago.

Complicating matters, an appellate court in December struck down the state's ban on carrying guns in public, saying that a complete ban on concealed carry is unconstitutional. Illinois is seeking a review of the ruling, even as state lawmakers have been given a matter of months to contemplate conditions under which guns could be allowed in public.

Many here say that even the strictest, most punitive gun laws would not alone be an answer to this city's violence.

"Poverty, race, guns and drugs — you've got to deal with all these issues, but you've got to start somewhere" said the Rev. Jesse L. Jackson Sr., who was arrested in 2007 while protesting outside Chuck's Gun Shop, the suburban store long known as a supplier of weapons that make their way to Chicago.

At the store, a clerk said the business followed all pertinent federal, state and local laws, then declined to be interviewed further.

Among seized guns that had moved from purchase to the streets of Chicago in a year's time or less, nearly 20 percent came from Chuck's, the analysis found. Other guns arrived here that rapidly from gun shops in other parts of this state, Indiana, Wisconsin, Kentucky, Mississippi, Georgia, Iowa and more.

"Chicago is not an island," said David Spielfogel, senior adviser to Emanuel. "We're only as strong as the weakest gun law in surrounding states."

 Print   Email   Comment | View 12 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
saveparadise wrote:
It is easy to blame the weapon of choice. Our government plays nana-kuli to the social issues at hand that are more difficult to address. As long as social indifferences exist whether it be racial, religious, financial, or other it is near impossible to stop violence. A good place to start is zero tolerance for criminals. Laws are created to protect the innocent and NOT the guilty.
on January 30,2013 | 01:49AM
hilocal wrote:
saveparadise, no reasonable person expects to stop violence, only to reduce it. If Chicago gun killings were reduced from 500 a year to 300-400, that would make the families of 100-200 people happier and would make Chicago streets a little safer.
on January 30,2013 | 06:32AM
saveparadise wrote:
hilocal, demonizing the weapon of choice will only shift the ratio of murders from gun to knife, hammer, automobile, etc.. The social issues at hand and seemingly little accountability for committing crimes are what need to be addressed. Keeping repeat offenders in jail and mental patients under stricter observation as they should be will decrease crimes overall. My proof is in the writing everyday. Perps in the news all have 10-30 priors or mental issues which should have been addressed. We have a common goal but a different view of the root problem. Aloha.
on January 30,2013 | 07:35AM
serious wrote:
Look at the corruption in Chicago! I was there a few years ago and at night it sounds like a firing range. Look at the amount of taxpayer money that flowed into south Chicago. Just like Detroit, it is heavy minority and on the federal dole. It is scary, I am surprised we haven't had the race riots we've had in the 60's.
on January 30,2013 | 03:20AM
ahi1pfb wrote:
Toughest gun laws. Shows you bad guys will always have guns. Gun laws will only prevent responsible citizens from defending themselves. If you believe a gun ban is gonna prevent bad guys from getting a gun, I can also get you a good deal on buying the Aloha Tower.
on January 30,2013 | 05:39AM
hilocal wrote:
ahi1pfb, that's the point of the New York Times article by Monica Davey: strict gun laws within a city are useless unless the surrounding areas and states have similar strict laws. It points out that Chicago police have seized more than twice as many guns as in New York City. But Chicago has only 1/3-1/2 NYC's population.
on January 30,2013 | 06:39AM
saveparadise wrote:
hilo, Put away the criminals and treat the mentally ill and you will not have to worry about any gun.....unless you are the one committing a criminal act against a law abiding citizen.
on January 30,2013 | 07:41AM
ahi1pfb wrote:
You can ban guns in the whole world and the bad guys will be the only ones with guns.Fact #1 Bad people break the law. What do they use to do that? A non registered illegally obtained gun. nuff said.
on January 30,2013 | 08:22AM
Dolphin743 wrote:
Maybe it's time for Rahm to answer the question of why so many violent criminals think Chicago is a great place to commit violent crime. Hint: guns are not the root of the problem.
on January 30,2013 | 09:59AM
nodaddynotthebelt wrote:
Again, guns don't kill people it 's people that kill people. But assault weapons that are made for mass killing does not to be regulated. Something has to be done before more of our childrn gets killed by these mass killing machines that were made for military fighting.
on January 30,2013 | 10:43AM
nodaddynotthebelt wrote:
Mass killing machines do need to be regulated. I believe that handguns can be used to protect one's self and family. Taking the gun away from law-abiding citizens will only help the criminals who will always have guns.
on January 30,2013 | 10:45AM
Oahuan2 wrote:
And if those law abiding citizens of Chicago were allowed to carry guns legally the death rate from guns would more than likely drop cause Chicagoans could protect themselves. Chicago should not be painted as the example against gun ownership. Mr. Obama never travels to Chicago without a well equipped Secret Service entourage. Are ordinary citizens less deserving of protection?
on January 30,2013 | 12:01PM
Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout

Wassup Wit Dat!
Can You Spock ‘Em?

Warrior Beat
Meal plan

Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War