Same-sex couples are challenging the veto of a bill to grant them rights and benefits
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Jul 30, 2010
LAST UPDATED: 02:41 a.m. HST, Jul 30, 2010
A major opponent of a civil unions bill is considering its next move after a lawsuit was filed yesterday challenging the governor's veto of the controversial legislation.
"We're formulating that (plan) right now," said Francis Oda, chairman of the Hawaii Family Forum, which was vocal in objecting to House Bill 444 throughout the legislative session.
Oda said the group expected there would be a legal challenge regardless of whether the bill was approved or rejected.
"Even if 444 had been passed ... a challenge about civil unions not being equal to marriage was ready," Oda said. "So it's just part of the process."
There was no comment from Gov. Linda Lingle's administration on the Circuit Court lawsuit filed on behalf of six gay couples who claim the state's reciprocal beneficiaries law provides only "limited protections" for same-sex couples and denies them the dignity and legal protection granted to heterosexual couples through marriage.
Denying same-sex couples the right to marry discriminates against gays and lesbians and "sends a clear and purposeful message that the state views lesbian and gay people as second-class citizens who are undeserving of the legal sanction, protections and support that heterosexual people and their families enjoy," the suit states.
It seeks a court order that same-sex couples be allowed to enter a legal status, known as a civil union, that would have the same legal rights and responsibilities that other couples can acquire through marriage.
The lawsuit stems from Lingle's veto of the bill, which would have given same-sex and heterosexual couples who enter into civil unions the same rights, benefits, protections and responsibilities as marriage under state law.
The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Hawaii, the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund and the Honolulu law firm of Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing.
Couple fights for rights in public, but lives an ordinary private life
Both sides see same-sex marriage in future
Tears and cheers as Abercrombie signs bill
Bill on civil unions to be signed today
Tourism industry split over civil unions' effects
Civil unions to 'bring more people' here
Governor to sign civil unions bill into law next week
'Historic' bill OK'd by Senate
Composure prevails in debate over civil unions
Civil unions bill wins final approval; awaits governor's signature
Civil unions approval expected today
Civil unions on the brink of approval
Panel passes civil unions bill
With bill, Illinois clears civil unions
Testimony by young adults raises issues of religion and marriage
Civil unions bill advances out of Senate committee
Lawsuits seek federal benefits for gays
Legislative numbers favor civil unions law
Civil unions bill fails to shift voters
Isle pair upbeat on gay marriage
Ruling energizes civil-union advocates
Civil union opponents regroup after suit filed
Couples sue state over civil unions
Abercrombie stresses support for civil unions measure
Hannemann would veto civil unions
Civil unions veto backlash begins
Judge strikes at gay-union ban
Lingle vetoes civil-unions bill
Emotions run high through crowds
Consequences of HB 444 will be felt at the ballot box
The governor's full civil-unions veto statement
Governor will announce civil unions decision at 3 p.m.
Bankoh opposes civil-union bill veto
Civil-union letter splits firms
Rights group considers boycott involving HB 444