Thursday, May 23, 2013
NEW YORK
Lawsuits seek federal benefits for gays
POSTED: 01:30 a.m. HST, Nov 10, 2010
Gay civil rights groups trying to build momentum for a possible Supreme Court showdown filed two lawsuits yesterday that seek to strike down portions of a 1996 law that denies married same-sex couples federal benefits.
The lawsuits were filed in federal courts in Connecticut and New York and come just months after a federal judge in Boston struck down a key component of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.
The legal actions seek judicial declarations that the law enacted by Congress in 1996, when it appeared Hawaii would soon legalize same-sex marriage, was unconstitutional because it prevents the federal government from affording pension and other benefits to same-sex couples.
Since 2004 five states -- Connecticut, Iowa, New Hampshire, Vermont and Massachusetts -- and the District of Columbia have legalized gay marriage.
In Hartford, Conn., the Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders sued the federal government on behalf of a Connecticut widower and married couples from Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire.
The other suit was filed on behalf of a New York woman, Edith Schlain Windsor, who met her late spouse, Thea Clara Spyer, nearly a half-century ago at a restaurant.
"No one should have to fight with the government after losing the person she's loved for more than four decades," said Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union. "Edie and Thea made the same lifelong commitment that other married couples make, and their marriage deserves the same dignity, respect and protection afforded other families."
Mary Bonauto, an attorney with Gay & Lesbian Advocates & Defenders, said the Connecticut lawsuit was filed to maintain the momentum the group gained with the success of its challenge against the law in Massachusetts.
The Justice Department said in a statement that it had no response to the lawsuits, except that the government "is defending the statute, as it traditionally does when acts of Congress are challenged."
RELATED STORIES
Couple fights for rights in public, but lives an ordinary private life
Both sides see same-sex marriage in future
Tears and cheers as Abercrombie signs bill
Bill on civil unions to be signed today
Tourism industry split over civil unions' effects
Civil unions to 'bring more people' here
Governor to sign civil unions bill into law next week
'Historic' bill OK'd by Senate
Composure prevails in debate over civil unions
Civil unions bill wins final approval; awaits governor's signature
Civil unions approval expected today
Civil unions on the brink of approval
Panel passes civil unions bill
With bill, Illinois clears civil unions
Testimony by young adults raises issues of religion and marriage
Civil unions bill advances out of Senate committee
Lawsuits seek federal benefits for gays
Legislative numbers favor civil unions law
Civil unions bill fails to shift voters
Isle pair upbeat on gay marriage
Ruling energizes civil-union advocates
Civil union opponents regroup after suit filed
Couples sue state over civil unions
Abercrombie stresses support for civil unions measure
Hannemann would veto civil unions
Civil unions veto backlash begins
Judge strikes at gay-union ban
Lingle vetoes civil-unions bill
Emotions run high through crowds
Consequences of HB 444 will be felt at the ballot box
The governor's full civil-unions veto statement
Governor will announce civil unions decision at 3 p.m.
Bankoh opposes civil-union bill veto
Civil-union letter splits firms
Rights group considers boycott involving HB 444
ON THE WEB
Gay married couples look to high court on benefits
Women file suit for right to marry
3 states oppose federal anti-gay marriage law
‘Soul Sessions’ feat. RootHub
