Quantcast
  

Sunday, May 19, 2013         

 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Sandwich case raises questions about eating food before paying

By Jennifer Sinco Kelleher

POSTED:


It happens daily in supermarket and convenience stores nationwide: digging into a bag of chips while waiting in line, sampling a couple of grapes in the produce section, opening a bottle of milk to appease a crying child.

The highly publicized story of a pregnant Honolulu mom who was arrested last week with her husband after she ate a sandwich in a Safeway store and forgot to pay, leading to the couple's 2-year-old daughter being taken away by Child Welfare Services, has sparked a national debate on the issue.

It also raised the question, Is it OK to consume food and beverages in the store before paying?

The woman in Hawaii who ate the sandwich has no problem with it.

"I didn't know it was such a taboo thing," said Nicole Leszczynski, who was charged with fourth-degree theft, a petty misdemeanor, along with her husband, Marcin. The charges have since been dropped by Safeway. "Where I grew up in a small town, it's not seen as stealing for sure."

Others are not so sure.

The story generated a robust debate on Facebook and Yahoo in comments following stories on the theft. Some argued that it's wrong to eat what you haven't paid for, and that police did the proper thing in arresting them. Others said eating while shopping has become an acceptable practice.

At the Safeway where the Leszczynskis were arrested, Linda Mercado and her friend Christine Lutley didn't get too far from the exit Wednesday before they began digging into their food purchases. Mercado polished off a package of sushi as she discussed her views on the issue.

"Pay before you eat," the 66-year-old Mercado said. "It's bad manners."

However, Mercado acknowledged drinking beverages in the past while waiting in line.

"I don't walk around the store drinking it," she explained. "

Shoppers Gerard and Ruth Viggayan said they consider eating before paying to be stealing.

"If you want to eat it, you have to purchase it," the 34-year-old Gerard said. "It's not like Costco where you get free samples."

Eating before checking out has clearly become part of supermarket culture. From supermarkets to Costco handing out food samples in aisles, shoppers associate stores with being an acceptable place to munch, said Dana Alden, a marketing professor at the University of Hawaii's business school and an expert in consumer psychology and branding.

Alden said it wouldn't be prudent customer relations for stores to crack down. He likened the acceptance of eating before paying to dropping a jar of peanut butter but still not being forced to pay for it.

As for the 28-year-old Leszczynski, the former Air Force staff sergeant, who is 30 weeks pregnant, was feeling faint and famished after a long walk to the Safeway and decided to eat a chicken salad sandwich while shopping. She saved the wrapper to have it scanned at the register, but she and her husband forgot to pay for their sandwiches as they checked out with about $50 worth of groceries.

When confronted by security, they offered to pay, but Honolulu police were called and the couple were arrested and booked. Their daughter Zofia was taken away. Leszczynski said she was embarrassed and horrified.

They posted $50 bail each and were reunited with their daughter after an 18-hour separation.

Safeway called Leszczynski on Tuesday and apologized for what she went through. The company also informed police the same day that it wouldn't press charges.

Safeway said management followed routine shoplifting procedure by contacting police, but the company regrets not foreseeing that doing so would cause a child to be separated from her parents.

Safeway said it has no policy that prohibits consumption of merchandise in the stores, "but customers are expected to be able to identify and pay for the consumed merchandise before leaving."






 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
999
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have read and agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. Any violations of these terms may result in account suspension or deactivation. Please keep your comments civil and in good taste. To report a comment, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
sugapam wrote:
First off, the couple is not from Honolulu, but came from California two weeks ago. They are not local. And second, they paid with WIC (or better known as food stamps). So in essence, we, the taxpayer, helped them pay for the food they bought. If they want to live here, learn the culture. We buy first and eat later.
on November 5,2011 | 05:21AM
swimmy808 wrote:
It doesn't matter where this couple comes from, the item isn't theirs until it is paid for. It's not a cultural thing. It's the mindset that comes with poor decision making and choices. The adults are responsible for the deecisions they make and should be held accountable..
on November 5,2011 | 06:03AM
Parkeiki wrote:
It is not Safeways responsibility to make sure the child is taken care of. The parents should have considered the consequences of their actions before stealing the sandwiches from the store. Safeway did the right thing by following procedures. They should have pressed charges.
on November 5,2011 | 07:29AM
damoke64 wrote:
People need to think and plan ahead. Pregnant, long walk, hmmm maybe prepare a backpack with food and water? Or how about go in the store purchase the items first and go outside? And later finish your shopping? Don't blame others due to your lack of judgment.
on November 5,2011 | 07:34AM
akuman808 wrote:
Akamai stores should post consumer signs in applicable locations stating the the store policy is NO CONSUMPTION in the store, period. That would mean elimination of food and beverage samplings.
on November 5,2011 | 09:15AM
HiroshimaBabe wrote:
Oh, they bought $50 worth of groceries?...... Whoa, wait a minute, they used WIC? Okay, Safeway, take back your apology. I would never pick up an item from any store and eat it unless I paid for it. That is just downright STUPID and we should not be letting them and the next bunch of idiots who will be doing the same thing get away with it. This is how HI 5-0 becomes burden with people like this. Taking Advantage...
on November 5,2011 | 10:22AM
Peacenik wrote:
Nah, too common sense.
on November 5,2011 | 04:37PM
Surfer_Dude wrote:
Eating before checking out has clearly become part of supermarket culture. From supermarkets to Costco handing out food samples in aisles, shoppers associate stores with being an acceptable place to munch, said Dana Alden, a marketing professor at the University of Hawaii's business school and an expert in consumer psychology and branding. Alden said it wouldn't be prudent customer relations for stores to crack down. He likened the acceptance of eating before paying to dropping a jar of peanut butter but still not being forced to pay for it." PROFESSOR......dropping a jar of peanut butter and not paying for it is an accident. Putting food in your mouth and not paying for it is THEFT. Munching on a free sample from Costco is no comparison to unwrapping and eating a sandwich with a price tag still on it and not paying for it. If you are UH's expert on consumer psychology and branding, I consider you their resident shoplifting proponent.
on November 5,2011 | 10:19AM
HiroshimaBabe wrote:
Noooooooooooo, eating before checking out is not part of a supermarket culture. Its because they want you to buy the products they have in their store.... its simply ... spend your monies in our store. Walking out of a store, regardless of what kind of store it is and not paying for it is simply; THEFT. Got it? You will be arrested once HPD is called. Got it? So if you want to spare yourself with a photo i.d. in HPD files, then pay for it. Simply! What's so hard about that? Geeeze, people!
on November 5,2011 | 10:26AM
KekoaBradshaw wrote:
Mrs. Leszczynski says in the small town where she grew up, eating food before paying for it "is not seen as stealing for sure". I'd like to know where she grew up. Some questions come up, too...She;s described as 26 years old, former Air Force master sergeant. Why is she no longer in the military? Dishonorable discharge, perhaps? She and her hubby sound like grifters, chronic thieves whose excuse when caught is to plead sympathy. That's why they commit crimes with small kids with them. Safeway, you're worn, wrong, WRONG for backing down on this.
on November 5,2011 | 04:57PM
3blackdogs wrote:
First of all, you don't see much people from Hawaii (unless they are from the mainland...) that would walk around with their food (sandwiches or drinks). Majority of everyone would pay first. If she was hungry..she should have go to MacDonalds or somewhere to get a bite first. I consider that as STEALING and if they completely showed that they were truly going to pay for the sandwich...they would have, but reading from the media and news reports, they made a fuss...so...SAFEWAY shouldn't be sorry for what they are taught to do when someone steals.
on November 5,2011 | 05:35PM
Anonymous wrote:
The first paragraph of this article describes the usual checking-out at the supermarket on the mainland, specifically Nevada. I grew up watching mainland people eating whatever they wanted and leaving the remnants on the shelves in the canned good aisles of Times and Safeway Supermarkets, Makiki. It happened often and I reported it to workers,but the perpetrators would leave the store quickly after consuming the free meal and drink. Yep, even pints or quarts of milk. These haoles thought they could get away with it, then used the kid for sympathy with the media. Hawaii locals aren't taught to mooch off of others like these transients.If her hometown is where they allow this type of slovenly behavior... then...hey... aloha oe !
on November 6,2011 | 05:36AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates