Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 17, 2014         

APEC HAWAII SUMMIT


 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

China's and Russia's leaders fail to echo U.S.

By Ben Feller

Associated Press

POSTED:



Searching for help, President Barack Obama lobbied the skeptical leaders of Russia and China on Saturday for support in keeping Iran from becoming a nuclear-armed menace to the world, hoping to yield a "common response" to a deepening problem.

Yet Obama's talk of solidarity with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev and Chinese President Hu Jintao was not publicly echoed by either man as Iran moved anew to the fore of the international stage -- and to the front of the fierce U.S. presidential race.

The United States' vast worries about Iran grew starker with a report last week by the U.N. atomic agency that asserted in the strongest terms yet Iran is conducting secret work with the sole intent of developing nuclear arms. The U.S. claims a nuclear-armed Iran could set off an arms race among rival states and directly threaten Israel.

Russia and China remain a roadblock to the United States in its push to tighten international sanctions on Iran. Both are veto-wielding members of the U.N. Security Council and have shown no sign the new report will change their stand.

Meeting with Medvedev on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific summit here, Obama said the two "reaffirmed our intention to work to shape a common response" on Iran.

Shortly after, Obama joined Hu, in a run of back-to-back diplomacy with the heads of two allies that hold complicated and at times divisive relations with the United States.

Speaking to reporters before he talked to Hu, Obama said that he and the Chinese leader want to ensure that Iran abides by "international rules and norms."

Obama's comments were broad enough to portray a united front without yielding any clear indication of progress. Medvedev, for his part, was largely silent on Iran during his remarks, merely acknowledging that the subject was discussed. Hu did not mention Iran at all.

As the president held forth on the world stage in the state where he was born and grew up, Republicans vying to compete against Obama for the presidency unleashed withering criticism in a debate in South Carolina. It was a rare moment in which foreign policy garnered attention in a campaign dominated by the flagging U.S. economy.

"If we re-elect Barack Obama, Iran will have a nuclear weapon. And if you elect Mitt Romney, Iran will not have a nuclear weapon," said Romney, the former Massachusetts governor. Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann warned that Iran's attempt to develop a nuclear weapon is setting the table "for worldwide nuclear war against Israel."






 Print   Email   Comment | View 5 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(5)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
clan4irish wrote:
"Shortly after, Obama joined Hu, in a run of back-to-back diplomacy with the heads of two allies that hold complicated and at times divisive relations with the United States." Since when has Russia and China become our allies?? Our alliance during WWII ended shortly thereafter and was followed by the Cold War, Korean War and Viet Nam War when we were fighting these clowns or their cronies. They are not part of NATO or SEATO, so why would AP (or anyone) call them allies??
on November 13,2011 | 05:15AM
WesleySMori wrote:
China and Russia both know what a "NUCLEAR WAR" MEANS. the "MAD" Scenario!!! I'M Sure China and Russisa are our allies in "PREVENTING the MAD SCENARIO" from HAPPENNING, for that SCENARIO will mean the "TOTAL DESTRUCTION of LIFE on EARTH"!!!! "GOD BLESS HAWAII & AMERICA"!!!!!
on November 13,2011 | 10:51AM
cojef wrote:
Both China and Russia are oligarchies, similar to Iran, and thus share the same beliefs that bind them together. It is fruitless to expect either or both to intervene for the benefit of the democratic Nato countries. All Nato countries do not possess nuclear arsenals, while China /Russia have enormous capabilities. Russia is not part of Nato and do not give a doodly poop about Israel, whereas, China with North Korea have been clandenstinely provided nuclear development assistance to Iran. Faced with these odds, it is formidable task. Good luck.
on November 13,2011 | 11:05AM
ehrhornp wrote:
Thank God for Consortiumnews.com
on November 13,2011 | 11:39AM
Kuniarr wrote:
Most probably Israel may take down Iran's nuclear ambition if the US can not. Israel's very existence would be in jeopardy should Iran succeed in building a nuclear bomb.
on November 13,2011 | 05:16PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates