Saturday, July 26, 2014         


 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Reform law could draw fresh scrutiny

Changes to the state's revamped foreclosure law threaten to reduce the reach of public notices and promote favoritism, critics say

By Allison Schaefers



The Legislature overhauled the state foreclosure law in 2011 and passed further changes during its latest session, but a main architect of the reform wants to revisit the legislation, specifically to address publishing requirements for foreclosure notices.

"I don't think (Act 182) is a perfect solution. I think we have to go back and take another look," said state Rep. Bob Herkes (D, Puna), chairman of the House Consumer Protection Committee.

To be reconsidered: what should be the frequency and reach of a newspaper publishing public notices, what qualifies as a newspaper, and whether foreclosure notices should be printed in newspapers and/or posted on a state website. There is also a conflict-of-interest issue involving the mainland-based business that helped persuade lawmakers to change the law and now stands to profit from it.


Part 1: Controversial changes to the state foreclosure law have stymied homeowners, lenders and the housing market recovery.


Part 3: Hawaii borrowers file suits after nonjudicial foreclosure auctions.

Act 182, which went into effect last month, allows foreclosure ads to run in weekly newspapers as long as those papers feature general news, have been publishing for at least a year and have circulation of at least 3 percent of a county's population. Previously, the ads had to run in the largest daily newspaper of general circulation in the county of the foreclosure to reach the broadest possible audience.

The 3 percent requirement, furthermore, is automatically eliminated in two years under the bill, opening up publication to any weekly newspaper featuring general news. The law also trims the publication requirement from three times to once in a qualified newspaper if it is also posted on a state website.

Proponents of the new requirements, including the legal firm RCO Hawaii, which has ties to one of the largest foreclosure mills in the Northwest, say the move will reduce a major expense for foreclosures by increasing competition for the advertisements. While the cost of running auction ads has long been a concern for governmental departments, foreclosure lawyers and lender representatives, the strongest written testimony in support of the bill was from RCO Hawaii. No weekly newspapers testified.

"This approach, which has been implemented in other states, ensures that a newspaper meets general circulation requirements, and that there is an opportunity for more than one paper to compete to publish nonjudicial foreclosure notices," RCO Hawaii's Mike Wong testified.

It also opens the door for RCO Hawaii to direct auction ads to an Oahu startup publication called The Island Sun Weekly, which shares common ownership and an office with FEI, a foreclosure services vendor.

Dennis Francis, Star-Advertiser publisher, and publishers of other Hawaii newspapers say there will not be competition among publications because Act 182 allows attorneys with financial incentives to direct auction ads to an affiliated company. That would let The Island Sun Weekly get a monopoly on foreclosure auction publishing since its owners also own Northwest Trustee Services and Foreclosure Expeditors/Initiators LLC, which services most of Hawaii's nonjudicial foreclosures, Francis said.

"It's really not competition at all," he said. "They'll just be feeding from their own trough."

State Sen. Rosalyn Baker (D, West Maui-South Maui), who was one of the primary architects of the new legislation, declined several Star-Advertiser interview requests for this article. But in an earlier interview she said requiring lenders to advertise auctions in the largest daily newspapers has led to inflated ad rates. "The entities in charge of the foreclosure sale should have other options," Baker said. "Our concern was not to give a monopoly in statute."

But critics say the law creates a potential monopoly favoring one-stop foreclosure trustee businesses, such as Northwest Trustee and FEI, while also raising conflict-of-interest issues and limiting residents' access to public notices.

Giving one party too much control over the foreclosure process is dangerous, said Daren Blomquist, vice president of RealtyTrac, an online foreclosure marketplace that collects and aggregates data for real estate companies and media.

"The more difficult it is to get your hands on the publication of foreclosure sale notices for each state, the worse off it is for the market because there is less transparency and a small pool of potential buyers of these properties," Blomquist said.

Joe Bradley, publisher of The Maui News, called the law a "big mistake" that will diminish the exposure of the last public notice before someone loses their home to foreclosure.

Paring notice requirements also could catch renters unaware when their rentals are at risk, said Tristia Bauman, a housing attorney with the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty, which is based in Washington, D.C.

"The most recent data suggests that 40 percent of all families facing eviction due to foreclosure are renters, and there are millions of children who will be affected and millions that have been affected," Bauman said.

Local attorney Gary Dubin, who represents homeowners facing foreclosure, said Act 182 raises red flags.

"I don't even have to look at whether it is good or bad for the borrower; it has the appearance of impropriety, " Dubin said.

If the Star-Advertiser certifies that it ran a foreclosure auction notice, Dubin said he would accept it at face value. "If it were RCO Hawaii, I'd have to spend some time checking them out because they are the opposition," he said. "That costs more."

Herkes, the Hawaii island Demo­crat, acknowledged that lawmakers should go back and add conflict-of-issue language to keep entities with a stake in the foreclosure process from profiting from the publication of auction notices. "We really struggled with this part of the bill," he said.

Overall, Herkes said the new law makes needed changes in the foreclosure law to protect consumers, but there are several concerns that should be addressed in the 2013 session.

He said the publication requirements should be rewritten to ensure that residents are able to read about foreclosures in the paper of central circulation where the action is taking place.

"In my case, I've got papers on both sides of the island, and we don't want a West Hawaii foreclosure in the Tribune," he said. West Hawaii Today is based in Kailua-Kona, and the Hawaii Tribune Herald in Hilo.

Herkes said the foreclosure notice provisions of the new law were decided after hours of negotiations between the House and Senate, and that Baker was a driver of the changes. "At some point we had to agree with Sen. Baker," he said.

Herkes said lobbyists and lawyers spent an inordinate amount of time arguing publication changes in the isles.

In the end, Herkes said he's not sure how legislators arrived at the frequency stipulation or the circulation required by Act 182. "We had so many things on the table, we just had to make some guesses," he said.

Francis said if the state's largest newspapers lose the foreclosure auction ad revenue, 40 to 50 people at the Star-Advertiser could lose their jobs and 15 at neighbor island papers.

He said it is unfortunate that "our own Legislature is saving mainland banking costs at the sacrifice of local jobs," but added that he is "hopeful that legislators will take another look at this issue next session."

While Baker would not consent to an interview, she previously pointed to increased foreclosure ad rates of the Star-Advertiser to justify changing the law. Costs for such ads on Oahu have ranged in recent years from $800 to about $2,800, representing a big chunk of foreclosure- processing costs.

Francis noted, however, that Baker and other Act 182 backers compared foreclosure ad rates of the former Star-Bulletin with those of the merged Star-Advertiser, which has a circulation more than three times greater than its predecessor.

"Rates during the last decade were below market because the Star-Bulletin and Advertiser were engaged in a price war," he added.

Still, to address the legislators' concerns, the Star-Advertiser lowered the rate for auction notices by half.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Grimbold wrote:
This is all baloney. The state should have a central register available to the public by internet or in person. There all foreclosures should be visible and ordered by address, and have all the info of the property tax department, size of land, size of house, age and description. So one can see with one look what it is that is foreclosed. No need to time wasting search for some hidden add in some unknown newspaper published on an unknowable date and then having to call for details.
on August 6,2012 | 04:52AM
iwanaknow wrote:
Your solution is too easy..................with a little more effort the State can make it impossible! ya?
on August 6,2012 | 12:15PM
onevoice82 wrote:
I wish Herkes would just go away!
on August 6,2012 | 05:45AM
ray63046 wrote:
It’s amazing how the Star-Advertiser is motivated to do some reporting when it affects its bottom line.
on August 6,2012 | 07:04AM
ready2go wrote:
Our voters should vote these 2 clowns out of office. They have been either fooled completely or will gain from this embarassing legislation.
on August 6,2012 | 08:13AM
LAX2HNL wrote:
The only thing you have to look at is the last sentence. The Star-Advertiser, in order to keep their money-making windfall, agreed to cut their foreclosure ad rates in HALF!!! They would not consciously lose money so you can imagine how much profit they've been reaping in since the merger. And Francis is just lying when he says the rates were below market when the SB and Advertiser were competing. They were the market. That's what competition does, it establishes the market price. Eliminate competition and prices soar. SA also won't tell you that neighbor island rates have not risen as much as SA's rates have but, of course, that would not serve SA's intent for this article so they are just silent on that.
on August 6,2012 | 10:56AM
McB0B wrote:
How hard would it be to pass a law prohibiting newspapers from charging more for foreclosure or auction notices than they do for all the rest, such as cars for sale, lost dogs, etc? If you ask me it's an ethical matter and it's sad that newspapers, which portray themselves as the conscience of the community, would even come up with the idea of taking such outrageous advantage and instead just be happy to have the guaranteed standard rate revenue. What they're doing now is contrary to the public good, as clearly evidenced by the fact that it's now going to mean your house can be sold after a "Public Notice" in some rag which 97% of the population doesn't even pick up. And how many of the 3% do they think read the legal notices section? Nauseating!
on August 6,2012 | 12:23PM
Latest News/Updates
Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War

Political Radar
Climate change

Island Crafters

Warrior Beat
Empty pit

Political Radar

Political Radar
`Progressive hero’