Quantcast
  

Wednesday, April 23, 2014         

NEW YORK TIMES


 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

A congressional meeting aimed at fixing Congress

By Jeremy W. Peters

New York Times

POSTED:



NEW YORK >> About a dozen members of Congress gathered in a Midtown Manhattan hotel ballroom Monday, an intentional remove from the marbled corridors of the U.S. Capitol, to chew over some uncomfortable questions: Why are we so ineffective? Why can't we manage to be the least bit civil to each other? And why does America hate us?

"Did you hear about the poll?" asked Rep. Charlie Dent, R-Pa. "Congress is now rated slightly above or below cockroaches and colonoscopies." (Actually, it was below.)

This being a fairly self-aware group, there were plenty of explanations.

"We are incentivized to do crazy things," said Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., who pointed out how angry diatribes delivered on the House floor made celebrities out of lawmakers.

Rep. Peter Welch, D-Vt., bemoaned how each party ignores the truth when it does not suit its purpose. "Congress is a fact-free zone," he declared.

These members of Congress, who were brought together by the group No Labels, which calls itself a bipartisan citizens' movement, have plenty of serious ideas about how to address these problems. For example, they would require Congress to work a five-day week instead of their customary three or four. The group also called for not paying Congress if it cannot pass a budget and for banning the signing of any pledges.

But whether or not the 24 representatives and senators recruited so far can persuade more colleagues to join their cause is another problem altogether. And even if they do that, convincing a skeptical public that they are more than just the latest do-gooders calling for political Kumbaya is a tough sell.

They are already facing difficult questions about whether they are just another Washington policy group that will hold conferences and churn out position papers but achieve little.

Asked at a news conference what their first step would be once they left the hotel Monday afternoon, Rep. Janice Hahn, D-Calif., had an answer that might have struck some as less than inspiring: more meetings.

"I hope when we leave here we can, first and foremost, continue meeting together, continue talking about the potential big ideas that we might tackle," she said. "And then I hope we recruit more members."

Could they name a bill or an idea that they all agreed on? "We haven't had that discussion," Welch said.

Would they disclose No Labels' donors? After an official from the organization told a reporter that she would have to follow up on that, Jon M. Huntsman Jr., the former governor of Utah and Republican presidential candidate and now a national co-leader of No Labels, stepped in to say that he would have no problem with full disclosure.

"Transparency is an important overriding philosophy for us," he said.

Many members of No Labels are new to Congress, like Sen. Angus King of Maine, an independent who was elected in November.

"Will this organization work?" King asked. "We don't know. This is unchartered territory."

Many members also have had the same reaction as their constituents to the workings of Congress: They were appalled. Everything from how bills seemed to pass only under the duress of a deadline to the lack of social interaction across party lines was unusual, they said.

Sen. Joe Manchin III, D-W.Va., who has been in the Senate for two years and is the other national leader of No Labels, with Huntsman, acknowledged: "We have no relationships. You know this is the first time some of us have met each other?"

Rep. Jack Kingston, R-Ga., summed up the promise the group's philosophy offers with a story about how he once shared a ride with Rep. James P. Moran, D-Va. After they got to talking, he said, he actually grew fond of his political adversary.

"That's the problem with ‘No Labels,"' he said in a videotaped message. "You start liking people."






 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(3)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
manakuke wrote:
A divided and partisan Federal Congress.
on January 15,2013 | 08:59AM
AhiPoke wrote:
Term limits and publicly financed elections would be a good start. What they are suggesting is effectively rearranging the chairs on the Titanic. The place is broken, minor changes will not fix it. Despite all their rhetoric to the contrary, a politician's primary goal is to get re-elected. As such, they are unwilling to make bold decisions to fix problems. They have also learned that giving away things is a effective way to win votes so spending has gotten out of control.
on January 15,2013 | 12:27PM
Mythman wrote:
The only way Congress will ever work will be when each member has an FBI agent assigned to spend every waking hour with the member checking on the legality of every move they make......
on January 15,2013 | 01:07PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates
Blogs
Political Radar
Reversal

Political Radar
Yield

Political Radar
`Plagued’

Political Radar
`Plagued’

Wassup Wit Dat!
Da Chicken Or Da Egg?

Warrior Beat
Depth perception

Political Radar
HB 1700 — Day 3