Quantcast

Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 13 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

National parks fear cuts will hurt visitors, resources

Federal spending reductions could affect hours of operation and protective services

By Tracie Cone

Associated Press

POSTED:


SACRAMENTO, Calif. » The towering giant sequoias at Yosemite National Park would go unprotected from visitors who might trample their shallow roots; tours of the USS Arizona Memorial would be reduced; sections of Cape Cod National Seashore's Great Beach would close to keep eggs from being destroyed if natural resource managers are cut.

Hawaii Volcanoes National Park would curtail school excursions, and Gettysburg would decrease by one-fifth the number of schoolchildren who learn about the historic Pennsylvania battle that was a turning point in the Civil War.

As America's financial clock ticks toward forced spending cuts to countless government agencies, The Associated Press has obtained a National Park Service memo that compiles a list of potential effects at the nation's most beautiful and historic places just as spring vacation season begins.

"We're planning for this to happen and hoping that it doesn't," said Park Service spokes­man Jeffrey Olson, who confirmed that the list is authentic and represents cuts the department is considering.

Park Service Director John Jarvis last month asked superintendents to show by Feb. 11 how they would absorb the 5 percent funding cuts. The memo includes some of those decisions.

While not all 398 parks had submitted plans by the time the memo was written, a pattern of deep slashes that could harm resources and provide fewer protections for visitors has emerged.

In Yosemite National Park in California, for example, park administrators fear that less frequent trash pickup would potentially attract bears into campgrounds.

The Arizona Memorial and Hawaii Volcanoes National Park attract more than 3 million visitors to Hawaii annually.

"We're hopeful Congress will be able to avoid these cuts," Cindy Orlando, superintendent at Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, told the Star-Advertiser on Friday.

Orlando said the cuts could have a ripple effect on the 1,200 jobs dependent on Hawaii Volcanoes National Park, which puts an estimated $96 million into the economy.

If the cuts occur, the national park plans to delay filling a half-dozen vacant positions as well, she said. Hawaii Volcanoes National Park has an annual operating budget of $7.3 million, and a 5 percent cut would total about $365,000, Orlando said.

At the Arizona Memorial, national park officials also plan to delay filling vacant positions, Eileen Martinez, spokes­woman for the World War II Valor in the Pacific National Monument, told the Star-Advertiser.

Martinez said the vacancies include rangers who conduct the tours, and the number of tours might have to be reduced from its current number of 29 daily. A reduction in tours might affect the more than 100 commercial tour operators that provide ground transportation to Pearl Harbor, he said.

Throughout the National Park Service, the cuts will be challenging considering they would be implemented over the next seven months — peak season for national parks. That's especially true at Yellowstone, where the summertime crush of millions of visitors in cars and RVs dwarfs those who venture into the park on snowmobiles during the winter.

One in 5 international tourists visits one of America's 398 national parks, research shows, and the parks are one-third of the top 25 domestic travel destinations. If the cuts go though, the memo shows national parks will notice fewer services, shorter hours and the placing of some sensitive areas completely off-limits to visitors when there are too few staff members to protect resources.

More than 3 million people typically visit Yellowstone between May and September, 10 times as many as the park gets the rest of the year.

"This is a big, complex park, and we provide a lot of services that people don't realize," Yellowstone spokes­man Al Nash said. "They don't realize we're also the water and wastewater treatment operators and that it's our job to patch potholes, for heaven's sake."

The memo says that in anticipation of the cuts, a hiring freeze is in place, and the furloughing of permanent staff for up to four weeks is on the table.

"Clear patterns are starting to emerge," the memo said. "In general, parks have very limited financial flexibility to respond to a 5 percent cut in operations."

Most of the Park Service's $2.9 billion budget is for permanent spending such as staff salaries, fuel, utilities and rent payments. Superintendents can use about 10 percent of their budgets on discretionary spending for things ranging from interpretive programs to historic-artifact maintenance to trail repair, and they would lose half of that to the 5 percent cuts.

"There's no fat left to trim in the Park Service budget," said John Garder of the nonprofit parks advocacy group the National Park Conservation Association. "In the scope of a year of federal spending, these cuts would be permanently damaging and save 15 minutes of spending."

For years Congress has been cutting funding to the National Park Service, and in today's dollars it is 15 percent less than a decade ago, said Garder, who is the nonprofit's budget and appropriations legislative representative in Washington, D.C. Park spending amounts to one-fourteenth of 1 percent of the federal budget, he said.

The Park Service also writes that communities around parks that depend on tourism to fill their hotels and restaurants would suffer.

Cape Cod National Seashore would close the Province Land Visitor Center, shutting out 260,000 people from May through October. Without monitors to watch over nesting birds, large sections of the Great Beach would close to keep eggs from being trampled.

The Great Smoky Mountains National Park will close five campgrounds and picnic areas, affecting 54,000 visitors.

The more than 300,000 visitors who use Grand Teton's Jenny Lake Visitor Center, a wildlife preserve and information station in Wyoming, would be sent to other areas of the park. The park's nonprofit association would lose a quarter-million dollars in sales.

Even programs important to the long-term environmental health of spectacular places are in jeopardy. At Yosemite an ongoing project to remove invasive plants from the entire 761,000 acres would be cut. The end of guided ranger programs in the sequoia grove would leave 35,000 visitors unsupervised among the sensitive giants. And 3,500 volunteers who provide 40,000 hours on resource management duties would be eliminated for lack of anyone to run the program.

"We remain hopeful that Congress is able to avoid these cuts," said Olson, the national parks spokes­man.

———

Star-Advertiser staff writer Gary Kubota and Associated Press writer Mead Gruver in Cheyenne, Wyo., contributed to this report.






 Print   Email   Comment | View 13 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(13)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
goodday wrote:
We gotta do what we gotta do. We've been spending way too much.
on February 23,2013 | 03:29AM
aomohoa wrote:
Sad but true. The fat has got to be cut!
on February 23,2013 | 08:13AM
2_centz wrote:
This comment has been deleted.
on February 23,2013 | 08:26AM
aomohoa wrote:
Fat is what I meant for wasteful spending. I guess you didn't get it.
on February 23,2013 | 08:26PM
allie wrote:
not everything is fat. Waste should be cut where possible but it won't be enough. Republicans hate America and waNT TO SEE it humiliated and low. Fund basic services!
on February 24,2013 | 07:28AM
soundofreason wrote:
Is our out of control spending causing some.........inconvenience? Darn shame. NEXT!
on February 23,2013 | 05:06AM
soundofreason wrote:
Ya notice how the stock market just isn't worried? Just government is.
on February 23,2013 | 05:22AM
aomohoa wrote:
The Stock Market is a false sense of security that makes some people think everything is fine.
on February 23,2013 | 08:15AM
kauakea wrote:
Well, guess we fire or not hire park workers while Solyndra and wind companies continue to collect.
on February 23,2013 | 06:31AM
Waterman2 wrote:
More scare tactics by the mafia in the white house. Being discussed is 2% of an increase in spending. Never let a crisis go to wazste....if you can't find a crisis, make one up. Lay off a few just for political gain. I'd be really up tight if it happened to me when it is all show. Wake up Hawaii, as long as we vote the way we have for decades, the tyranny will only get worse and worse.
on February 23,2013 | 08:17AM
Ronin006 wrote:
The sky will not fall when sequester takes effect and the sooner, the better. The government must stop spending money it does not have on programs that are not needed.
on February 23,2013 | 12:11PM
poidragon wrote:
you actually have no clue as to what will or will not happen if and when the sequester goes into effect! One thing is for sure, the GoP will be taking the heat for all the problems that occur, for their haphazard political stance, the voters will remember this come 2016!
on February 23,2013 | 04:49PM
Ronin006 wrote:
I do have a clue as to what will happen when sequester takes effect. It will force the secretaries of all federal departments to do what they were hired to do – manage, set priorities, eliminate wasteful practices and reduce or eliminate nice to have programs. And why will Republicans take the heat for sequester when it was Obama’s idea?
on February 23,2013 | 05:36PM
allie wrote:
as they should. Republicans are a danger to America.
on February 24,2013 | 07:29AM
soundofreason wrote:
Amen
on February 23,2013 | 04:53PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Latest News/Updates
Blogs