Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 1 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Panel OKs bill giving counties more geothermal oversight

By Anita Hofschneider

Associated Press


Hawaii lawmakers are debating a bill to give the counties more control over the development of geothermal energy resources.

Many state leaders see Hawaii's volcanoes as part of the solution to the state's energy woes. Already, geo-thermal energy supplies about 20 percent of the electricity used on Hawaii island. But environmental groups and Native Hawaiian organizations are worried about the effects of unbridled development.

The House Committee on Finance approved a bill Monday that would require county approval of geothermal energy projects by establishing a county-level permitting process.

The bill also explicitly allows counties to impose rules limiting geothermal energy development.

Advocates say the proposal adds important environmental safeguards and community input.

But some say the current version of the bill doesn't provide enough protections for the land or the public.

The original version of the bill, authored by Rep. Faye Hano­hano (D, Hawaiian Acres-Pahoa-Kala­pana), sought to overturn a 2012 law that allowed geothermal energy development to occur throughout the state, rather than just in designated subzones. Critics say the law doesn't allow enough county oversight over potential projects.

The purpose of the law was to make it easier to develop geothermal energy, but Hano­hano says it went too far.

"Every time they talk about streamlining, it's more like steamrolling," the Demo­crat said. "Let's do it right."

Although the House Committee on Water and Land changed Hano­hano's bill from a full repeal to simply a county permitting process, Hano­hano said she supports the current version.

Robert Harris, president of the Hawaii Sierra Club, says that while a county permitting process is a good idea, the state should also reinstitute the subzones.

Harry Kim, former mayor of Hawaii County and a strong proponent of the original bill, agrees.

But the state Department of Land and Natural Resources and the Department of Business, Economic Development and Tourism oppose re-creating subzones.

The departments told lawmakers that doing so would be unnecessary and costly. They said they support giving counties more input instead.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 1 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
shanik wrote:
The fractured renewable energy lobby in this State is comical
on February 26,2013 | 08:50AM
Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout

Wassup Wit Dat!
Can You Spock ‘Em?

Warrior Beat
Meal plan

Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War