Friday, July 25, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Star-Advertiser sues governor over disclosure of names of judicial candidates

By Ken Kobayashi

LAST UPDATED: 08:41 p.m. HST, Aug 23, 2011

Star-Advertiser Court filling

The Honolulu Star-Advertiser filed a lawsuit against Gov. Neil Abercrombie this afternoon seeking the release of names of judicial candidates he considered in appointing state judges.

Abercrombie has refused to disclose the names of four to six candidates on the list submitted to him by the state Judicial Selection Commission when he appointed Sabrina McKenna to the Hawaii Supreme Court this year.

His refusal, the Circuit Court lawsuit said, violates the state Uniform Information Practices Act, which mandates that government records be open to the public.

The governor has maintained that the names fall under an exemption to the law because the release would have a "chilling effect" on potential applicants.

Abercrombie's press secretary, Donalyn Dela Cruz, said Tuesday evening,“The governor firmly believes that public disclosure is detrimental to attracting potential judicial applicants. His approach in making judicial appointments is to ensure the confidentiality of these applicants.”

But the suit argues his reasoning does not support keeping the names confidential.

"The Star-Advertiser brings this action to compel Governor Abercrombie to honor Hawaii's strong public policy of open, transparent and accountable government and publicly disclose the list of nominees presented to him in January 2011 by the Judicial Selection Commission from which he appointed Associate Justice Sabrina McKenna," the lawsuit said.

Star-Advertiser publisher Dennis Francis said the newspaper "held off on taking on this action in hopes that the governor might rethink his position, but it has become apparent he will not.

'"It appears that only a court order will provide the transparency that we believe the public deserves."

The controversy over the release was triggered Jan. 20 when the governor disclosed to the Star-Advertiser he would not be releasing the names of the candidates to the high court.

His decision was a departure from the practice of his predecessor former Gov. Linda Lingle, who released the names from the commission and sought public input before she made her appointments.

It was the practice of Lingle's predecessor, former Gov. Ben Cayetano, to release the names after he made his nomination.

Some in the legal community support the governor's stance, including retired Circuit Judge Eden Elizabeth Hifo and Honolulu lawyer Daniel Case.

But open government advocates, such as Common Cause Hawaii and the League of Women Voters of Hawaii, said the governor should disclose the names.

The suit details the Star-Advertiser's efforts in asking the governor for the names, and in asking the Office of Information Practices for assistance.

On Feb. 3, Cathy Takase, then the OIP acting director, wrote in response to a query by the Star-Advertiser that the "frustration exception" to the state law requiring disclosure ends once a judicial appointment is approved by the Senate.

The governor still refused to release the names when McKenna's appointment was approved by senators on Feb. 16.

The newspaper asked OIP to help in getting the names, but Cheryl Kakazu Park, who was appointed by the governor to replace Takase, replied in a letter to the newspaper and the online news organization Civil Beat on May 13 that the office would not be issuing an advisory opinion.

Park wrote that because the governor's position was that he would not release the names until directed by the state court, another OIP advisory opinion would be "futile."

The Star-Advertiser asked Park to reconsider. She turned down the request on June 9.

Star-Advertiser editor Frank Bridgewater said the governor has not offered a "credible" reason for keeping the names confidential.

"We think releasing the names after Senate confirmation, as called for by the Office of Information Practices, would be a wise and fair way to handle the situation.

"It would give the public the information it needs to evaluate the governor's choice and the list provided by the Judicial Selection Commission."

The lawsuit said, "After the new OIP Director washed the OIP's hands of responsibility" and said court action would be necessary to resolve the dispute, the newspaper was "left with no alternative but to institute this action."  

Abercrombie, who took office in December, has appointed two other judges since his first appointment of McKenna to the high court.

The governor appointed Rhonda Loo, who was been approved by the Senate and is now a Maui circuit judge.

Abercrombie's appointment of Karen Nakasone this month to the Oahu circuit court bench is awaiting Senate action.

The governor also will be making other judicial appointments, most notably selecting two other associate justices to the five-member high court because of the mandatory retirement law at age 70 for state judges.

During the governor's four-year term, Associate Justice James Duffy turns 70 in June next year and Associate Justice Simeon Acoba will be 70 in 2014.

The lawsuit also asks for a judgment declaring that "a governor must disclose the list of judicial nominees" after the Senate confirms a judicial appointment.

The lawsuit does not ask for any monetary damages for the Star-Advertiser but asks for attorney fees and costs, which could be the tens of thousands of dollars depending on the scope and length of the litigation.

"The governor's burden of proof in this case is nearly insurmountable," Diane Hastert, Star-Advertiser attorney, said.  "He must prove with compelling evidence that releasing the list to the public somehow makes talented lawyers unwilling to apply to be judges.

"But the high quality of our state judiciary in the last two decades easily refutes that argument, doesn't it?"

She added:

"When the Star-Advertiser prevails, it will be entitled to recover the fees and costs it incurs in this suit.

 "The governor said he would not disclose the list unless a court ordered him to do so, so ironically, the public is going to pay to see its own documents.

"In a time of tight budgets, the governor should not be wasting taxpayer money hiding the list of judicial nominees from the public, especially after the Senate consented to his appointment."

The lawsuit asks for an expedited consideration by the courts.

Star-Advertiser Court Filing

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Ken_Conklin wrote:
Will this newspaper also demand the list of names of nominees for the 5-member Roll Commission under Act 195 ? Will this newspaper also demand disclosure of OHA expenditures on administration and lobbying and advertising for the Akaka bill, Kau Inoa, etc? Or are those cows too sacred?
on August 23,2011 | 04:38PM
HD36 wrote:
The State of Hawaii is viewed by many as the most corrupt in the nation. The obvious implication is that he has handed out favors to his friends in return for favorable verdicts in the future.
on August 23,2011 | 06:30PM
IWAKUNI wrote:
Oh, what a difference a day makes... And then I still remember those days, not long ago, when the publishers of the SA printed nothing but glowing praise for Candidate Neil and publicly endorsed him as their pick for Governor. I still haven't decided who the biggest victims of buyer's remorse in Hawaii might be--the HSTA, the SA or simply every single person who was foolish enough to think that Neil Abercrombie, who had never in his career held an administrative or executive position (just like his godson, Barry Soetoro), would make a competent leader of our state. OOPS!!
on August 23,2011 | 05:07PM
soshaljustic wrote:
It may be argued the Gubernatorial process may simply be altered dependent upon the Judicial Selection Commission process. As in "the names of nomineesforwarded to the appointing authority, shall beconfidential and may not be discussed outsidecommission meetings, except among commissionmembers, or as made necessary by Rule 9 or Rule 12,or pursuant to Rule 13." as found on http://www.courts.state.hi.us/courts/judicial_selection_commission.html The ballot being entirely secretive, obviously for reason, and the confidentiality to be maintained for reasons to assure the most unbiased and non-corrupt of proceedings as allowed within our Judicial system of faulty and biased human beings, it would seem necessary to keep unwarranted and biased public commentary to a minimum. If little public commentary is received on a candidate to date, the candidate decides to enter this pool, it would seem best not to muddy the waters with unwanted public commentary at a crucial time. If the candidate was denied, any unwarranted public commentary after the fact, may preclude the chance for a fine judge to apply in the future. Every process needs to be taken as a INDIVIDUAL CASE in this regard when retaining or releasing the entire roster of names.
on August 23,2011 | 05:43PM
saywhatyouthink wrote:
What a waste of taxpayer resources, someone has to sue in order to find out who's applying to be a judge? The judicial selection committee is a public entity, why should anything they do be secret from the public? He must be picking people that aren't on the list, that would be the only reason to not release the names.
on August 23,2011 | 06:25PM
saywhatyouthink wrote:
What a waste of taxpayer resources, someone has to sue in order to find out who's applying to be a judge? The judicial selection committee is a public entity, why should anything they do be secret from the public? He must be picking people that aren't on the list, that would be the only reason to not release the names.
on August 23,2011 | 06:25PM
Anonymous wrote:
Hawaii is viewed as one of the most corrupt states in the nation. This further solidifies that view. The obvious implications here are that he has handed out favors to his friends in return for favorable verdicts in the future.
on August 23,2011 | 06:28PM
Aloha wrote:
Why not publish the names and backgrounds of any public candidates? All willing to be appointed / designated / elected to "serve" the public should expect to be publicly disclosed prior to any appointment, designation, or election taking place. (At least that's what my American Government class taught me, way back when...)
on August 23,2011 | 07:13PM
MalamaKaAina wrote:
Mahalo Star Advertiser for exposing this one term Gov to the light of day.
on August 23,2011 | 10:56PM
Breaking News