Quantcast

Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Casino plans sprout in U.S. as states seek revenue

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 09:20 a.m. HST, Jan 14, 2012


 

NEW YORK >> A Malaysian company’s plan to build a $4 billion convention center and big-time casino on the outskirts of New York City could be the biggest shot fired yet in a tourism arms race that has seen a growing number of Eastern states embrace gambling as a way to lure visitors and drum up revenue.

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo announced last week that he would work with the Genting Group, one of the world’s largest and most successful gambling companies, to transform the storied, but sleepy, Aqueduct horse track into a megaplex that would eventually include the nation’s largest convention center, 3,000 hotel rooms, and a major expansion of a casino that began operating at the site in October.

The proposal came less than two months after once-puritanical Massachusetts passed a law allowing up to three resort casinos, plus a slot machine parlor, at locations around the state.

Ohio is poised to see its first commercial casinos open this year, after voters approved up to four gambling halls in 2009. Maryland’s first casino opened last year, with more on the way. Pennsylvania’s first casinos opened in 2006, and already the state is threatening to surpass Atlantic City as the nation’s second-largest gambling market. 

And in Florida, lawmakers are hotly debating a whopper of a bill that would allow up to three multibillion-dollar casinos, plus additional slot machines at dog and horse tracks. Genting appears confident the law will pass. It has already spent around $450 million to acquire waterfront property in Miami, where it wants to build a $3.8 billion complex that would include a casino, dozens of restaurants and a shopping mall.

States have embraced casinos, after years of trepidation about their societal costs, for two simple reasons: a promise of a rich new revenue source, plus the possibility of stimulating tourism.

“They are faced with tough decisions. They are in recession ... And we pay taxes far over and above normal taxes,” said Frank Fahrenkopf, president of the American Gaming  Association.

Last week alone, Genting’s new gambling parlor at Aqueduct, now limited to 4,500 video slot machines and another 500 electronic table games, made nearly $13 million — putting the “racino” on pace to make $676 million per year, with 44 percent of that take going to a state education fund.

And that total is nothing compared to the $1.4 to $2 billion per year Genting predicts it would bring in at the huge complex it is planning in Miami.

Some experts, however, have questioned whether revenue bonanzas that large are realistic, and say states should be cautious about giving up too much to lure these projects. Competition for a limited pool of gambling and tourism dollars is already fierce, and recent years haven’t been kind to casinos.

Nevada’s larger casinos lost $4 billion in 2011, according to a report released this month by the state’s Gaming  Control Board, as the state continued to feel the effects of the global economic slump.

As gambling options have increased in the East, revenue has slid substantially at the pair of Indian tribe-owned casinos in Connecticut and declined by a dramatic 30 percent in Atlantic City, which has lost customers in droves to the new casinos in nearby Philadelphia, according to David Schwartz, director of the Center for Gaming  Research at the University of Nevada Las Vegas.  

That trend could deepen with the introduction of big-time gambling in New York and Massachusetts, and in the end result in a situation where few people need to travel to gamble.

And that could mean that the tourism promise of the casinos largely goes unfulfilled, as the gambling  tables and slot machines are played predominantly by locals taking revenue from other parts of the economy, rather than out-of-state visitors bringing in new dollars, said the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a Washington D.C. research group that advocates for progressive tax codes.

“Gambling may simply shift money from one tax to another, limiting the net gain to the state,” it said. “Consumers spend more money on gambling activities, they will spend less money on other items, such as recreation and even basic needs.”

Gambling resorts, most notably Las Vegas, have responded to tougher competition by trying to make themselves into destinations for visitors of all stripes, offering concerts, theater, museums, zoos, restaurants and other attractions.

Genting appears to be planning a variation on that model for New York.

The company and the project’s champion, Cuomo, have heralded it first and foremost for the planned convention center, which they have boasted will be the nation’s largest.

Genting has insisted it will go ahead with construction of the center even if the state doesn’t pass the constitutional amendment needed to fully legalize the type of casino it wishes to operate at the site, with table games run by human dealers rather than the electronic machines.

“I can’t be clearer about this: This project, this convention center, is in no way predicated on the legalization of table gambling in New York,” said Stefan Friedman, a publicist for the company. “We think there is a real opportunity here.”

The company has, however, asked for permission to expand its current casino operation as part of the deal. It also wants to alter its revenue-sharing deal so it can take home a bigger slice of the profits.

There are some skeptics. The convention center the company wishes to build will be a 45-minute taxi ride from Manhattan, or an hour or longer by train. It will be located in a residential area where there are now no restaurants, shops or sites of interest, aside from nearby John F. Kennedy International Airport.

Convention centers across the country have been losing money for many years, and suffering from attendance declines even while going ahead with expansion projects.

“I would consider that a very risky business proposition,” said Heywood Sanders, a professor of public administration at the University of Texas who is a leading critic of using taxpayer money to build convention centers.

He noted that the nation’s biggest convention center, Chicago’s McCormick Place, has seen attendance drop steadily in recent years, despite several expansions and costly upgrades. The Chicago Convention and Tourism Bureau reported that 2 million people attended events at the center in 2010, compared to 3 million in 2001. Convention delegates dropped to 890,000 from 1.3 million over that same decade.

Cuomo himself noted in a letter to New York legislators this week that many convention centers lose money, and he expressed doubt over the wisdom of using public money to pay for such facilities, saying it was “debatable” that they generate enough new tourism to validate the investment.

But he noted that, in this case, the building would be privately funded and operated.

“The state is not building anything. We are not spending public money on a convention center. Genting, a private entity, will take the risk of economic success,” he said.

That argument rang true with Kathryn Wylde, president of the Partnership for New York City, an influential group of business leaders.

“There is only upside for the city and state,” she said. “We have very little to lose by encouraging them.”

As in Florida, Genting appears to be betting big that the state will eventually eliminate legal hurdles to expanded gambling. It paid $380 million up-front for the right to operate at Aqueduct for 30 years, and said it is prepared to spend billions of dollars constructing convention and exhibition space, as well as a theater and 1,000 hotel rooms, even without the gambling expansion it desires.

Clearly, Friedman said, the company doesn’t believe the East Coast is saturated with either casinos or convention centers.

That said, it isn’t necessarily keen for more competition. As part of its negotiations with the state, he said, the company is discussing a possible grant of exclusivity that could prevent another casino from opening “right in our backyard.”







 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(14)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
ready2go wrote:
Greed and fear! They still rule the World. Bankrupt States, Municipalites are desparately groping for money and are changing our values and lifestyles. What do we legalize next? The rich don't need to gamble and the poor wind up poorer! As the dealers in Nevada always say "good luck"!
on January 14,2012 | 09:44AM
Vivgie wrote:
Should be interesting. They're not jumping in little steps at a time. Going whole hog which means BIG risks. A possible stumbling block might be by the time they finish, nobody got any money if they got no jobs. Better pray there are enough rich folks who think money should be spent and not hoarded since they can't take it with them. If they succeed then we will need to ask ourselves whether adding another casino to a thousand others in the USA will give us a significant cut of the pie to be worth an investment. What will be the returns?
on January 14,2012 | 09:47AM
Ambergris23 wrote:
Perhaps Hawaii should look into these possibilities for additional revenue and creating more jobs.
on January 14,2012 | 10:19AM
KeithHaugen wrote:
LOL
on January 15,2012 | 05:30AM
jimbone wrote:
IF Hawaii was smart, make small kind lottery's. That only pay out 1.5 million each. So that winner's can pay off there homes and debts. And have a little something to help the kids out... Not these stupid 250 million winner kind lottery's.. Spread the money around to alot of people.. just MY 2 cents.
on January 14,2012 | 10:34AM
CAHAOLE wrote:
Maybe let Native Hawaiians have casinos like the Indian Casinos on the mainland??????????
on January 14,2012 | 10:37AM
olos73 wrote:
Hawaii's politicians and anti-gambling people are dumb. They grumble about having to pay higher everything, but can't come up with ANY solutions. Politicians wasting our money instead of putting it to good use. People think a lottery like jimbone said, will hurt the small guy. No, it's the politicians that are hurting the small guy. How can 1 casino hurt the image of Hawaii? It's not like it's going to be rows and rows of casinos like Las Vegas. Whatever money the casino or lottery brings in is a plus for the State. Right now, how much surplus money do we have? Residents are paying for everything. Anti-gambling advocates shouldn't complain because it's the gamblers money that's being added to the coffers, not theirs. In fact, they should be happy that they can keep their money in their pockets. Gamblers losses is added to the State. If you don't want to gamble, don't gamble. If anti-gambling people can come up with solutions, bring it on...
on January 14,2012 | 11:26AM
bigislandkurt wrote:
Gaming now!
on January 14,2012 | 04:47PM
KeithHaugen wrote:
"gaming" is the gambling industry's word for "gambling." They want you to think it is just a "game" and there is no "gamble" involved. When you see that word in a headline, it usually means that the writer supports gambling, or someone paid someone to call it by that innocuous moniker.
on January 15,2012 | 05:26AM
Changalang wrote:
The steady drumbeat begins mere days before the Legislature opens for business. Gambling in Hawaii is Pandora's box. The person who opens it cannot ever close it; then they lose possession of the box itself. Some Hawaii politicians are much more wise than given credit for. The coming Casino is the next Rail. People will think it is a good idea until it is too late to get off the track as the true costs, social and otherwise, rears its ugly head. A Casino on Oahu is also inevitable as well. The people of Hawaii have not learned much since white sailors offered them worthless nails for s3x. Many just died from gonorrhea and syphilis forgetting about the nails by their deathbeds. Sleep with the devil and try not to get burned.
on January 14,2012 | 04:56PM
KeithHaugen wrote:
Every year, the crime bosses and gambling industry wine and dine (and payoff?) some of our elected officials, in an attempt to legalize gambling in Hawai`i. It goes on all year, but is more noticeable when the Legislature opens and some poor, misled senators and representatives try to get rich. And every year, their efforts fail ... because we are smarter than people in the Mainland states. Let's hope that never changes.
on January 15,2012 | 05:30AM
stanislous wrote:
Keith, Shouldn't that read: ".. .to keep our elected officials FROM LEGALIZING gambling." Think of all the money illegal gambling here in Hawaii and legal gambling in Las Vegas would LOOSE if Hawaii legalized gambling. LOL LOL LOL
on January 15,2012 | 11:10AM
ebo wrote:
The rail will bring the casino. When you build it thet will come. Harbor Freight and Trader Joe's will follow. We already have skid row.
on January 15,2012 | 03:31AM
KeithHaugen wrote:
And with the new casinos will come the increases in crime, welfare, more home foreclosures, divorces, school dropouts and dozens of other social ills that always creep in where gambling is legalized and casinos spring up. Look at the stats in Las Vegas, compared to Hawai`i where there are no casinos, no lottery. We have problems, but statistics show that keeping legal gambling, casinos, the syndicate, etc. out pays off in the long run.
on January 15,2012 | 05:23AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout

Wassup Wit Dat!
Can You Spock ‘Em?

Warrior Beat
Meal plan

Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War