Quantcast
  

Thursday, May 24, 2012         

 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Hawaii leads nation with 40 percent interracial marriage rate

By Rebecca Trounson

Los Angeles Times

POSTED: 04:51 a.m. HST, Feb 16, 2012
LAST UPDATED: 01:41 p.m. HST, Feb 16, 2012

Share


Hawaii and the Western United States are leading a nationwide surge in interracial marriage, according to a new study that paints a picture of a broadly diversifying nation, one where color lines are blurring and old taboos fading.

One-fifth of all recent weddings in the western United States were between people of different races or ethnicities, said a report being released Thursday by the Pew Research Center. Nationwide, 15 percent of recent marriages were interracial, researchers found.

The trend is most pronounced in Western states, where waves of immigrants have helped broaden the pool of prospective spouses. Hawaii was most likely to have couples who “married out,” with about 4 in 10 of the state’s newlyweds between 2008 and 2010 marrying outside their racial or ethnic group. In California, which ranked sixth in the listing behind several of its Western neighbors, more than 23 percent of recent marriages were across such lines.

“In the space of half a century, intermarriage has evolved from being illegal to taboo to being merely unusual, and with each passing year, much less unusual than it used to be,” said Paul Taylor, director of Pew’s social and demographic trends project, which produced the study.

Once outlawed in many states, marriages across racial or ethnic lines now make up about 1 in 12 of all existing unions in the U.S., or about 4.8 million couples, the study found. The change has been helped along by growing public acceptance of such relationships, especially by young people, and by rising numbers of Asian and Latino immigrants, the researchers said.

Nationwide, the study, based primarily on an analysis of recent and historic U.S. Census data, found that a record 8.4 percent of all current marriages are between spouses of different races or ethnicities, up from about 3 percent in 1980.

Overall, Latinos and Asians were most likely to marry outside their race or ethnicity, the researchers found. More than a quarter of those in each group who wed in 2010 married someone of a different race. That compares with about 17 percent of blacks and about 9 percent of whites, although because whites are by far the largest racial group in the U.S., most intermarriages of all kinds included a white spouse.

“This shows a continuing breakdown of racial barriers or boundaries in the U.S,” said Daniel Lichter, a sociology professor at Cornell University. “But I don’t think it means we’ve moved to a post-racial society. The vast majority of marriages in this country are still within a single race.”

Still, he said, the trend seems likely to continue, with today’s young people having greater opportunities than previous generations to interact equally with one another in schools, neighborhoods and the workplace.

The report also included data from several recent Pew surveys showing growing public acceptance of marriages across racial and ethnic lines, 45 years after the Supreme Court declared all remaining state bans on such marriages unconstitutional. For example, more than 80 percent of those who responded to a Pew survey in 2009 said they agreed with the statement that it was “all right for blacks and whites to date each other,” up from 48 percent in 1987.

That’s a welcome change to Chula Vista residents Amy Wise, who is white, and her husband, Jamie Wise, who is black. Married 19 years, the couple has one daughter, Tatiana, 17, but life has not always been easy, said Amy Wise, who chronicles her interracial family in a blog. Her husband’s family is now very loving to her, but “it was years before I was accepted,” she said. “That was a rough road.”

Also rough have been the periodic negative comments or mistaken assumptions the couple still encounters, Wise said. “We live in San Diego, for goodness sake, but we still have issues sometimes, and that really just blows my mind in 2012.”






 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
999
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have read and agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. Any violations of these terms may result in account suspension or deactivation. Please keep your comments civil and in good taste. To report a comment, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
soshaljustic wrote:
So? Biracial couples exist among Biethnic couples. Are we done counting Biethnic and Multiethnic couples now? Are we done counting Multiracial couples too? Are these one and the same? Should they be? Do these silly categories of RACE continue and perpetuate racial disparities and discriminations or does the eventuality of multiracialism somehow make all the disparities and discriminations go away? Will we find new categories for dissemination of hierarchical goods and power. Theological systems next? Never mind, we already do that with the My god is better than your no god or plurality of gods. What of some other weird thing like genderisms...:o( geez guess we do that one too. We will find something to take the place I am sure,cuz we gotta have that hierarchical ladder of "who is better than" count of people stats, rather than counting people as normative and beautiful in diversity.
on February 16,2012 | 06:41AM
HD36 wrote:
Is this something the government actually pays for?
on February 16,2012 | 07:17AM
Hapa_Haole_Boy wrote:
Hapa is the way everyone will be eventually. Cultural, social, ethnic, biological diffusion-- it's natural. So this is no surprise. In Hawaii, it happens all the time-- who cares? People who think you must stay in your own race/ethnicity are backwards thinking.
on February 16,2012 | 01:47PM
Breaking News