Quantcast
  

Wednesday, June 19, 2013         

 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Japanese experts warn of future risk of giant tsunami

By Elaine Kurtenbach

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:46 p.m. HST, Apr 01, 2012


 

TOKYO >> Revised estimates of the potential impact from an earthquake off Japan's southern coast show much of the country's Pacific shore could be inundated by a tsunami more than 112 feet high.

A government-commissioned panel of experts says a tsunami unleashed by a magnitude-9.0 earthquake in the Nankai trough, which runs east of Japan's main island of Honshu to the southern island of Kyushu, could top 112 feet.

An earlier forecast in 2003 put the potential maximum height of such a tsunami at less than 20 meters or 66 feet.

The revisions, contained in a report released Saturday and posted on a government website, are based on new research following last March's magnitude-9.0 earthquake and tsunami, which devastated a long stretch of Japan's northeastern coast and killed about 19,000 people.

Last year's catastrophe, and the ensuing crisis at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, has prompted sweeping reviews of Japan's disaster preparedness, and criticism over apparent failures to take into account potential risks.

The tsunami knocked out power at the 40-year-old coastal nuclear plant, leading to the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl in 1986. Tens of thousands of residents have had to leave the area, and it's unclear whether some will ever be able to move back.

The Fukushima plant was designed to withstand a 20-foot tsunami. The actual surge was 45 feet high.

In other unsettling news, another government report shows that a strong earthquake hitting the Tokyo Bay region could shake the Tokyo-Yokohama metropolitan area — home to more than 33 million people — at the maximum seismic intensity of 7 on the Japanese scale.

The report, issued Friday by the Ministry of Education, came in the form of mapping that shows that much of the Tokyo region would likely experience severe shaking from a magnitude-7.3 earthquake inside Tokyo Bay.

The study prompted calls for Tokyoites to be better prepared for such disasters. Although they live with the constant threat of a major earthquake that experts have long said is overdue for the region, not all living in the region keep recommended water and other supplies on hand.

A report in the newspaper Asahi Shimbun listed troubles that might be expected from a major quake, such as electricity outages that could persist for more than a week and water supply disruptions that could last for nearly a month, based on government estimates.

The revised tsunami forecast for a possible Nankai earthquake says Tokyo could expect waves up to 7.6 feet high. But at the coastal town of Kuroshio, on the island of Shikoku, the tsunami could top 112 feet, it shows.

The computer modeling for the revised forecasts assumes a high tide for the highest estimates.






 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
999
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have read and agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. Any violations of these terms may result in account suspension or deactivation. Please keep your comments civil and in good taste. To report a comment, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Highinthesierras wrote:
Adios Hawaii
on April 1,2012 | 06:12AM
jaluasa wrote:
Small compared to what flank collapse (though rare) on the Big Island could if it occurs.
on April 1,2012 | 08:51AM
squidman22 wrote:
Absolutely. Historical evidence has shown such a flank collapse tsunami completely covering the island of Lanai.
on April 1,2012 | 12:25PM
al_kiqaeda wrote:
Oh yeah. Just go onto Google Earth and look at the underwater features around Oahu, Molokai, and Maui look like. The collapse of the Koolaus was titanic. If Puna or Hualalai slides off into the Pacific the top of Diamond Head will be under hundreds of feet of ocean. Maui will become two islands for a while. And Kauai...they won't have to worry about the Super Ferry anymore.
on April 1,2012 | 04:04PM
Waimanalodayz1 wrote:
Japan better move there nuclear power plant more inland.
on April 1,2012 | 10:47AM
mellowyellow11 wrote:
the problem i have is that no regulatory agency - Japanese or US, is telling all of us how much radiation is actually in the saltwater ocean and the potential for fish and seafood contamination. These idiots in Japan, the biggest copy cats in the world - copied all our technology but when it comes to making sure disasters like this dont happen and what to do about all that damage and suffering they are clueless or actually callous. they could give a flying f---- about consequences as long as they make money. Now we got seafood all radiated in the pacific ocean and all oily and sludged up in the Atlantic from BP. Whats an oyster - ahi lover to do? ck out the us geographic site showing the radioactive seawater fastly approaching Hawaii. go to this link https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=314616805258750&set=a.103196473067452.5165.100001312988366&type=1
on April 1,2012 | 11:39AM
surfergirl808 wrote:
japan had experts that told them not to build a nuke plant next to the sea in that area. history of the area had seen tidal waves in the past. they built there because it was cheap and unlimited cooling sea water for the reactors. it was just a matter time. to say they didnt know there was danger is such an untruth.
on April 2,2012 | 06:11AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News