Thursday, July 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Romney: Obama shouldn't use bin Laden in campaign

By Beth Fouhy

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 12:56 p.m. HST, May 01, 2012

NEW YORK >> Republican Mitt Romney on Tuesday accused President Barack Obama of politicizing the death of Osama bin Laden a year ago but said it was "totally appropriate" for him to claim credit for ordering the U.S. military raid that ended with the terrorist leader's death in a hideout in Pakistan.

Obama's re-election campaign has used his decision to suggest that Romney would not have made the same call. Romney, the president's all-but-certain Republican challenger in the fall election, says he would have.

Marking the anniversary at a New York City fire house that lost 11 men on Sept. 11, 2001, Romney said he understood the president's desire to take credit for killing one of the world's most-wanted men.

"It's totally appropriate for the president to express to the American people the view that he has that he had an important role in taking out Osama bin Laden," Romney said after visiting the lower Manhattan fire station with Rudy Giuliani, who was mayor when terrorists flew planes into the World Trade Center's twin towers and killed nearly 3,000 people.

"I think politicizing it and trying to draw a distinction between himself and myself was an inappropriate use of the very important event that brought America together," Romney said.

He and Giuliani had just eaten pizza with several fire fighters.

For his part, Obama marked the occasion by putting the power of incumbency on display. He flew unannounced to Afghanistan to sign an agreement cementing the U.S. commitment to that country after the war there ends. His predecessor, Republican George W. Bush, sent troops there shortly after 9/11 to eradicate Taliban and al-Qaida forces.

Romney insisted that he would have ordered the strike on bin Laden's hideout in Pakistan.

"This is a person who had done terrible harm to America and who represented a continuing threat to civilized people throughout the world," Romney said, echoing his comments from a day earlier. "Had I been president of the United States I would have made the same decision."

Democrats have pointed to Romney's suggestion when he ran for president in 2008 that he would have taken a different course of action. He said in 2007 that it was "not worth moving heaven and earth" to catch one person.

Asked about the matter at the White House on Monday, Obama suggested — without saying Romney's name — that people should be held accountable for past statements about the pursuit of bin Laden.

Giuliani, a former Romney rival and critic who since has endorsed the former Massachusetts governor's bid, also said Obama shouldn't use the anniversary to attack Romney.

"If he wants to take credit for it I have no problem with that at all. I wish he wouldn't use it as a source of negative campaigning. I think that's a big mistake," he said.

Romney also tried to clarify another comment from 2007, when candidate Obama was being criticized for saying he would conduct unannounced raids inside Pakistan if high-level terror targets were found to be hiding there. Romney criticized Obama at the time, saying: "I do not concur in the words of Barack Obama in a plan to enter an ally of ours."

Romney suggested Tuesday that he had simply criticized Obama for signaling his intentions about what he would do as president.

"We always reserve the right to go anywhere to get Osama bin Laden," Romney said. "I said that very clearly in the response that I made, but that I thought — and many people believed as I did — that it was naive on the part of the president at that time, the candidate, to say he would go into Pakistan."

Before visiting the fire station, Romney ate breakfast with the current mayor, Michael Bloomberg, a Republican-turned-independent who has avoided endorsing anyone in the presidential race so far.

Asked whether he would make an endorsement, Bloomberg didn't shut the door.

"I'll see down the road," he said after Romney had departed. He said Obama and Romney are "both very smart, very formidable candidates. They're very different and they give the public a real choice."

 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Bothrops wrote:
If you are visiting a NYFD firehouse that lost 11 members at 9-11, you don't talk politics.
on May 1,2012 | 10:21AM
Kapakahi wrote:
Spot on!
on May 1,2012 | 10:35AM
Highinthesierras wrote:
And if you are with the Japanese Prime Minister?
on May 1,2012 | 03:59PM
Bothrops wrote:
"the Japanese Prime Minister?" why not? But NYFD, those fire houses are hallowed grounds. Men went out of them and never came back, indeed many were never found again. You show respect.
on May 1,2012 | 09:30PM
Bothrops wrote:
The reality is that Bin Laden got taken out on Obama's watch. You can bet Romney would be attacking him, if Bin Laden were still around. And if Romney really did say getting Bin Laden was not a priority, visiting a NYFD firehouse that lost eleven members in the twin towers should have started with an apology.
on May 1,2012 | 10:27AM
OldDiver wrote:
I believe the deal President Obama made with Governor Romney was if you don't lie and flip flop during the campaign the he would not use the killing of Bin Laden in the campaign.
on May 1,2012 | 10:27AM
Highinthesierras wrote:
Just don't hold me to my promises of four years ago was also part of the deal.
on May 1,2012 | 04:00PM
Kapakahi wrote:

George Bush didn't use his "Commander-in-Chief" status for political gain, huh? And John McCain didn't campaign based upon, in part, the idea that his war experience might make him better able to defend the United States? So the president who actually followed through and killed Bin Laden is not allowed to take credit for that? Only chest-thumping Republican braggarts and fear-mongerers are entitled to PRETEND they "are tough on defense"?


on May 1,2012 | 10:34AM
Highinthesierras wrote:
Come on, the fix was in, al Qaida was tired of him and Pakistan allowed it to go forward IF no fingers were pointed at those who protected him for the years he lived in the same house. Dead men tell no tales.
on May 1,2012 | 04:02PM
Naloboy wrote:
Isn't it always the guy who doesn't have the goods that's the one to tell the other he shouldn't use the goods he has? In other words, Moneybags Mitt, shut your mouth. Already you're a sore loser.
on May 1,2012 | 10:57AM
frings wrote:
So Republicans can use the topic of terrorism to scare the hell out of citizens for years and to extract a particular way that they expect people to vote ("you're either with us or against us", the color coded terror threat game, Dems are soft on terror, Obama "pals around with terrorists"). I sometimes find it hard to believe that Republicans aren't permanently impaired from all the two faced, bald faced lies they tell. And to top off Mittwitt's latest rant, here he stands next to Rudy Giuliani, the head terrorism monger. It's been said, quite accurately, that Giuliani knows only three words...a noun, a verb and 911. To paraphase an earlier poster...MISSION ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISHED.
on May 1,2012 | 10:57AM
HazieMae wrote:
Says Romney while hanging out with 9ui11ani. MISSION ACTUALLY ACCOMPLISHED.
on May 1,2012 | 11:44AM
kuewa wrote:
Would have, could have, should have, but only one person actually did give the orders to proceed, and that person has every right to remind people that the mission was accomplished. I have yet to read about any significant Romney accomplishments except for the Mass healthcare law (which he now partially disavows) and bankrupting companies while at Bain.
on May 1,2012 | 01:55PM
loquaciousone wrote:
I think that it's totally inappropriate for Romney to pass himself off as a human being. He is made of jello and rubber and everything lice.
on May 1,2012 | 02:21PM
Breaking News