Quantcast
  

Sunday, April 20, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Experts un-like ruling in Facebook free speech case

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 03:28 p.m. HST, May 04, 2012


 

NORFOLK, Va. >>  The "like" button on Facebook seems like a relatively clear way to express your support for something, but a federal judge says that doesn't mean clicking it is constitutionally protected speech.

Exactly what a "like" means — if anything — played a part in a case in Virginia involving six people who say Hampton Sheriff B.J. Roberts fired them for supporting an opponent in his 2009 re-election bid, which he won. The workers sued, saying their First Amendment rights were violated.

One of those workers, Daniel Ray Carter, had "liked" the Facebook page of Roberts' opponent, Jim Adams.

While public employees are allowed to speak as citizens on matters of public concern, U.S. District Judge Raymond Jackson ruled that clicking the "like" button does not amount to expressive speech.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(3)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
manakuke wrote:
Realities of social; media; it's just entertainment.
on May 4,2012 | 05:25AM
Manapua_Man wrote:
I don't like the way Facebook puts the real name down as someone who "likes" an article. There are instances when a person gets mistaken for someone else with the exact same name. People just quickly take a glance, see the name, and assume it was you who "like" the article. Never know that one might have been passed over for a job interview because of this.
on May 4,2012 | 06:14AM
CriticalReader wrote:
Maybe it would help if Facebook also created a "Disclaimer" buttton, with sub-buttons providing a range of explanations that might accurately reflect any variations or differences from a complete and unconditional "Like" (if social media is going to take over society and our lives it has the obligation to accurately reflect the entire range of human thought and condition - QUIT BEING SO LAZY FACEBOOK!!! Crack the whip on your programmers!). Another option would be to be able to click on "Like" but choose to have it unpublished, so only the clicker would be privy to the fact that they had clicked "Like". The added benefit of such an option would be to serve the purpose of providing the clicker the illusion that what they think actually matters and is being imposed on others while shielding them from the emerging possibility (or "trend") of negative retribution.
on May 4,2012 | 07:04AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News