Quantcast
  

Wednesday, May 22, 2013         

 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Akaka among the most erudite speakers in Congress, study finds

By Star-Advertiser staff & McClatchy Washington Bureau

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 04:19 p.m. HST, Jun 04, 2012


WASHINGTON >> U.S. Sen. Daniel Akaka speaks at a college sophomore level, according to an analysis of his speeches by the Sunlight Foundation, a Washington group that pushes for government transparency.

The analysis ranks Akaka in the top five among members of Congress for his use of longer sentences and more complex words.

U.S. Sen. Daniel Inouye isn’t far behind. His speeches use words and sentences on the level of a college freshman. U.S. Rep. Mazie Hirono speaks at the level of a high school senior, while U.S. Rep. Colleen Hanabusa’s speeches are at the high school freshman level, according to the study.

U.S. Rep. Mick Mulvaney, who talks at just below an eighth-grade level, lower than any of his 534 congressional peers, laughs at the study.

“Folks back home think I’m an effective speaker and an effective writer,” Mulvaney, a freshman Republican from South Carolina,  told McClatchy Newspapers. “I try to write and speak in a conversational style. I have people thank me every week for at least making an effort to explain complex things in a comprehensible fashion.”

The study took lawmakers’ floor speeches since 1996, as published in the Congressional Record, and ran them through the Flesch-Kincaid test, which links longer sentences and more complex words with higher grade levels.

Rep. Dan Lungren, ranked at a “20th grade” level, the highest level in Congress and roughly like a Ph.D. candidate defending a dissertation, is flattered by his rank.

 “I very much am a student of the spoken word. I started as a debater and a competitive speaker in high school. I had outstanding teachers who challenged us to try to learn to communicate and to use the right words. As a legislator, I’ve tried to ensure that we pay attention to the words we put in statute,” Lungren,a nine-term Republican from Long Beach, Calif. said.

The Sunlight Foundation ran some cornerstone U.S. political speeches and documents through the same test. The Constitution came in at grade 17.8, about the level of a master’s degree student. The Declaration of Independence hit 15th grade, akin to a college junior. Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address scored at the 11th-grade level. The Rev. Martin Luther King’s iconic “I Have a Dream” speech reached the ninth grade.

The average member of Congress speaks at a 10.6 grade level, down from 11.5 in 2005. President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address to Congress in January clocked in at an 8.4 grade level. That’s almost exactly the 8.5 grade level at which the typical American speaks.

David Perlmutter, a political communications professor at the University of Iowa, found the Sunlight Foundation study to be - well, pretty sophomoric. He noted that Ernest Hemingway wrote short sentences with simple words and William Faulkner employed long sentences with complex words, yet both are considered great writers.

“I don’t buy the method, I don’t buy the conclusions and I don’t buy some of the analysis,” Perlmutter said. “We’ve all met idiots who have Ph.D.s and people who never went to college but are brilliant.”

Lee Drutman, a political scientist at the Sunlight Foundation who oversaw the study, doesn’t disagree.

“What some will interpret as the dumbing-down of Congress, others will see as more effective communications,” Drutman said.

—-

HOW MEMBERS OF CONGRESS RANK BY GRADE LEVEL

A recent analysis by the Sunlight Foundation assigned grade levels to all 535 members of Congress based on their House and Senate speeches since 1996. The method equates simple words and short sentences with low grade levels. Here are the five lawmakers with the highest grade levels and the five with the lowest, along with other key ratings for comparison:

U.S. Constitution (college master’s student, grade 17.8)

Rep. Dan Lungren, R-Calif. (college senior, grade 16)

Declaration of Independence (college junior, grade 15.1)

Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard, D-Calif. (college junior, grade 14.9)

Rep. Jim Gerlach, R-Pa. (college sophomore, grade 14.2)

Rep. Tom Petri, R-Wis. (college sophomore, grade 14.2)

Sen. Daniel Akaka, D-Hawaii (college sophomore, grade 14.2)

Typical newspaper article (high school graduate, grade 12.5)

Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address (grade 11.2)

Average member of Congress (grade 10.6)

Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech (grade 9.4)

Average American (grade 8.5)

President Barack Obama’s 2012 State of the Union speech (grade 8.4)

Rep. Tim Griffin, R-Ark. (grade 8.1)

Rep. Sean Duffy, R-Wis. (grade 8.1)

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. (grade 8)

Rep. Rob Woodall, R-Ga. (grade 8)

Rep. Mick Mulvaney, R-S.C. (grade 7.9)





More From The Star-Advertiser

Akaka's diction among Hill's most complex




 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
999
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have read and agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. Any violations of these terms may result in account suspension or deactivation. Please keep your comments civil and in good taste. To report a comment, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Kuokoa wrote:
It is ALWAYS better to speak at the level of our audience/constituents rather than higher than they are. Most educated people speak at the eighth grade level and some even lower. So leaders should do the same and not let on about how wise and knowledgeable they are.
on June 4,2012 | 08:49AM
kameleokalani44 wrote:
I agree with Kuokoa, Know your audience. If you are speaking to high school kids, speak TO them not above them. Because you will loose them. The PhD will get it,and so will the others. especially the older generations.
on June 4,2012 | 09:09AM
false wrote:
"lose", not loose.
on June 4,2012 | 11:20AM
Blue_Powder wrote:
Pretty useless article. Effective speakers speak at the level of their audience. If not, your message probably get lost. Not that complicated.
on June 4,2012 | 09:12AM
false wrote:
Yeah, it is pretty simple.
on June 4,2012 | 09:57AM
allie wrote:
Silly survey as all of Akaka's speeches are written for him by staffers.
on June 4,2012 | 02:42PM
WesleySMori wrote:
To "COIN A WORD" ALLIE!! "TRUE"!!! "GOD BLESS HAWAII & AMERICA"!!!!!!!
on June 4,2012 | 03:17PM
kainalu wrote:
Hmm? And what about military-serving, tax-paying, working-class stiffs, aka Joe Six-pack and Soccer-mom Melanie - at what level do they speak at? Get it?
on June 4,2012 | 10:27AM
WooWoo wrote:
I agree that it's important to speak at the level of your audience. Isn't the real question here why that level is identified as grade 8.5?
on June 4,2012 | 11:00AM
eastside808 wrote:
Effective use of words doesnt really matter to people unless they know the difference. What is more important is the ability to effectively communicate your thoughts to the level of your audience through words, examples and visual prompts. We all learn and communicate differently.
on June 4,2012 | 11:36AM
WesleySMori wrote:
Amen EASTSIDE808!! "AMEN"!!!! "GOD BLESS HAWAII & AMERICA"!!!!!!
on June 4,2012 | 03:21PM
oahuson wrote:
I no can understand what all you saying!
on June 4,2012 | 11:42AM
loquaciousone wrote:
dat becaus they not smata dan one fifth grada.
on June 4,2012 | 12:03PM
hilopango wrote:
Whatevers...I just hope they didn't use taxpayers money for this idiotic, sophomoric, imbecilic, futile study.
on June 4,2012 | 12:02PM
Ronin006 wrote:
Now we know why the people of Hawaii do not know what our elected leaders are saying. They are speaking at academic levels far above what most Hawaii residents can understand.
on June 4,2012 | 12:32PM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Some of those politicians could not spell CAT if you spotted them a "C" and a "T". Others eat their soup with a fork. Never use a big word when a little word will do because that obfuscates the integrity of your parlance, if you see what I mean.
on June 4,2012 | 12:37PM
artwork wrote:
To the futile researchers and writers of this article, "Keep it simple, stupid."
on June 4,2012 | 12:52PM
Bothrops wrote:
Hard to take this seriously if it gave such low scores to Jefferson's Declaration of Independence and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address. Of course one of the shortest and most effective speeches ever was by General Anthony Clement McAuliffe of the 101st Airborne. When asked by the Germans during the battle of the Bulge whether he would surrender the surrounded town of Bastogne to avoid annihilation, he replied "Nuts".
on June 4,2012 | 12:54PM
Ronin006 wrote:
No, he actually said "f--- y--." but that could not be reported in the news media because it would have been considered obscene.
on June 4,2012 | 05:00PM
Publicbraddah wrote:
The key is communicating effectively. That is, communicating at the level of the people you're speaking to.
on June 4,2012 | 12:57PM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Huh? What did you say? What's that mean?
on June 4,2012 | 05:09PM
kukaikid wrote:
don't know why no one said but here it is.. who cares if DA is also one of the most inneffectual congressmen at the same time.
on June 4,2012 | 01:02PM
NanakuliBoss wrote:
Sometimes it's the KISS theory. Keep it simple ,stupid.
on June 4,2012 | 01:26PM
ahkyee wrote:
The headline of this article is misleading. Using longer sentences and complex words is not a sign or erudition. It could be argued that the true discription of such speaches is obfuscation. To be erudite, a speaker needs to be knowledgable of the subject he/she is addressing. I very much doubt that many of our representatives in Congress possess great knowledge of the problems this country truly faces.
on June 4,2012 | 01:59PM
allie wrote:
true
on June 4,2012 | 02:43PM
Peacenik wrote:
If they're speaking at 10th grade level, it's easy to presume that their comprehension of the complexity of the situations facing our country is not far behind. If their addressing other members of Congress, they cannot and should not be speaking at 10th grade level. Don't know why all the posters are making excuses for them, saying they have to speak at level of their listeners (so 8th and 10th grade level is acceptable). No wanda Hawaii so jam up li dat.
on June 4,2012 | 02:19PM
Portageewrench wrote:
"What'chu talkin' 'bout, Willis?"
on June 4,2012 | 02:35PM
rhs763 wrote:
But not effective! Been laying out a nice salary for 2 decades w/ no returns.
on June 4,2012 | 02:40PM
AhiPoke wrote:
When you consider their constituencies should anyone be surprised. Most voters don't seem as interested in issues as they do personalities and perceptions based on advertising.
on June 4,2012 | 03:25PM
Changalang wrote:
He would be number one if measured via the Aloha scale in his heart and words.
on June 4,2012 | 03:30PM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
That's sweet! Totally irrelevant, but sweet.
on June 4,2012 | 05:10PM
Changalang wrote:
I think it is relevant because it explains a lot of his election victories over the decades. In Hawaii, if people like you; it is hard for a politician as being seen doing wrong because Hawaii voters view them as their "friend" and culturally protect their friends vehemently as if they are family; "cuz". Akaka attained 'everybody's uncle' status, and was genuine. When compared to Hawaii's public perception of Linda Lingle as the Wicked Witch of the East; the stark contrast is apparent, and the election will demonstrate it in November.
on June 4,2012 | 07:48PM
inverse wrote:
As compared to Lazy Hirono who is like the cowardly lion in the Wizard of Oz who is always running scared when Ed Case wants to openly debate her in a public forum. As for Akaka's success, he is almost like the wizard of Oz in terms of his favorite 'uncle status' however people do NOT want to know the truth beyond his public persona and instead want to keep that curtain permanently closed on what is really going on with this senator in his advanced age and his true effectiveness as a Hawaii congressional representative.
on June 5,2012 | 01:30AM
Changalang wrote:
He gained re-election via his personality, but gave creedance to the office by being Sen. Inouye's loyal second vote. In the era which is now over of leveraging up the pie and getting the biggest piece for one's home state; Akaka's KNOWN reliability as Inouye's second vote geometrically magnified Inouye's power to rise to the Master of the Game slot; Appropriations Chair. However, we need the most straight talent now to compete in the arena on skills alone. Hawaii should default to picking the best qualified; Ed Case is that person and the time is now. Problem is, not enough people know of Mazi's failure or how important this position is for Hawaii for the post-Inouye era. Everyone in the Senate and our electorate knew exactly what Akaka was about. No enemies.
on June 5,2012 | 08:58AM
inverse wrote:
Thats your problem. You praise Inouye's "rise to power" yet in his sunset years he showed incredibly poor judgement by continuing to hold a grudge and supporting Hirono over Case. I think it is pretty clear if the race is between Hirono and Lingle, Lingle will win. However if the race is between Case and Lingle, not so clear who would win. I am NOT a Lingle supporter but between Hirono, Case and Lingle, Lingle is the lesser of three evils. Problem in Hawaii is there needs to be some balance between Demos and Repubs and currently there is NONE. That is why these ill-conceived, special interest, bankrupt busting projects such as the train to nowhere and the interisland power generation cable project has gone so far as they have in Hawaii.
on June 5,2012 | 09:45AM
Changalang wrote:
That is everyone's problem in Hawaii. Inouye is 20 percent of our income from Federal dollars and the spigot will run dry in November. I have been very careful in my positioning and have monitored all the polls, internal and otherwise. Lingle will not win against either Democrat. Lingle v. Hirono will result with a huge wave turn out in a General election. She brings more union votes than Hirono. Lingle's only chance to win is to run against Case. Case will suppress the Inouye arm of the Hawaii Democratic Party in the General; because that is how they think; shun, ignore, and passively wish for a Case loss to teach him a lesson. Your problem is that you refuse to realize that the GOP in Hawaii is not a second Party. There is only One party in Hawaii. Either faction is 100 times more influential than GOP here. Blame Lingle; she killed you guys. Ben's candidacy for Mayor proves my point; Governor Ben Cayetano, lifetime DEMOCRAT. Just like Ed Case, the person best qualified to rebuild Hawaii's Senate presence 4 the next generation.
on June 5,2012 | 01:04PM
HealthyandHappy wrote:
Hey Mr. Politician Why don't you give a speech to the people that inflation is about to get out of control. Why don't you tell the unemployed youth don't worry be happy. Why don't you give a speech to the senior citizens on Navigating the Death Panels of Obamacare.
on June 4,2012 | 04:21PM
HealthyandHappy wrote:
Its about leadership not storytelling. We need leaders, doers not talkers.
on June 4,2012 | 04:34PM
jussayin wrote:
what a silly article and 'study'! waste of money and time. communication is a two way street. u can talk like a PhD and if the audience doesn't understand u, then it's a waste of time. not sure what mr. akaka has done 4 us since he's rarely on tv or any other media talking about our nation problems.
on June 4,2012 | 05:09PM
ussf wrote:
Balogna. Credit (or scorn) should go to the Senators staff who author his speechs/comments. The man reads the speeches laboriously at about a third grade level.
on June 4,2012 | 10:06PM
residenttaxpayer wrote:
Typical of congress...all talk and no show!!
on June 5,2012 | 12:23AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News