Wednesday, July 23, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 11 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Pacquiao-Bradley rematch? Not so fast

By Lance Pugmire

Los Angeles Times


LAS VEGAS >>  Manny Pacquiao reserved a contractual right to request a rematch against Timothy Bradley if he lost Saturday.

And even though Pacquiao was left stunned by a split-decision defeat in which two of three judges awarded Bradley a 115-113 victory, it?s not a given that the pair will reunite in November.

Fight promoter Bob Arum said after the bout that he heard from ticket brokers who said they would have trouble selling seats to a Bradley rematch because most fight watchers considered the World Boxing Organization welterweight title bout on Saturday at the MGM Grand a one-sided Pacquiao victory.

?The brokers are telling us if we make a Bradley rematch, no one will go,? Arum said.

Todd duBoef, president of Arum?s Top Rank promotional company, said he?d like to see the results of polls asking fans if they want a rematch before committing to a second fight.

Veering from Bradley would deny him another major purse after he earned $5 million against Pacquiao. Bradley manager Cameron Dunkin said following Saturday night?s fight that he would expect a rematch purse to be ?something near? $10 million now that Bradley has the belt.

So there?s some leveraging going on too.

Pacquiao?s alternatives would be another run atFloyd Mayweather Jr., who?s due for release from Clark County (Nev.) jail on a domestic-violence conviction in August, or a fourth fight against Juan Manuel Marquez.

Bradley improved to 29-0 with Saturday?s victory, but few outside of his supporters were buying the scores that favored him from judges Catherine J. Ross and Duane Ford.

Arum said Bradley told the promoter in the ring before the scorecards were turned in, ?Manny?s a great fighter. I tried as hard as I could, but I came up short.?

Despite concerns Pacquiao (54-4-2) had been flat in his two previous fights and might be unfocused after experiencing a religious awakening this year, the Filipino superstar returned to form close to his peak and connected on 253 punches to Bradley?s 159, according to CompuBox statistics.

?I was proud of Manny,? Pacquiao trainer Freddie Roach said. ?I thought it was his best fight since? a 2009 victory over Miguel Cotto. ?He clearly won the fight. I think the judges had their eyes closed. Something wasn?t right.?

Nevada State Athletic Commission Executive Director Keith Kizer said he does not anticipate any discipline or review of Ross or Ford.

?Every fighter who loses a close fight looks at the judges,? Kizer said. ?I think every judge should strive to get better.?

Arum expressed concern for boxing fans? faith in the sport.

?The outcome of this is not good,? he said. ?I hope boxing recovers.?

Pacquiao said he would ?respect the decision, but I 100 percent believe I won the fight. The best attitude is respect and professionalism. I hope this dismay doesn?t cause people to discard the sport. I?m still here. I can fight.?

Arum told Pacquiao on the news conference stage that, ?If you want,? the Bradley rematch, ?that?s what we?ll do.?

Pacquiao, who hadn?t lost since March 2005, hasn?t knocked out an opponent in five consecutive fights. He said meeting Bradley again, ?would make me become a warrior in the ring, because I don?t want it to go to the judges.?

Pacquiao had a 158-to-80 lead in punches-connected after seven rounds against Bradley, who twisted an ankle in the second round and was clearly failing to convince the champion that he was capable of a knockout.

?I was glad Bob Arum gave me an opponent who would fight toe-to-toe,? Pacquiao said. ?My goal was to exchange strong punches, but then toward the end he started running. ? Aside from three rounds, I hurt him, and I know he felt that.?

Bradley trainer Joel Diaz said his fighter won five of the last six rounds on Ross and Ford?s scorecards by ?moving.?

?After the seventh round, I was continued action,? Bradley said. ?There were three judges, and two of them thought I won. What do you want me to do??

 Print   Email   Comment | View 11 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
manoamist wrote:
pacquiao did'nt lose. Boxing did.
on June 10,2012 | 04:48PM
808Cindy wrote:
These judges have made the fans of the sport of boxing feel like we don't know anything about this sport, because of their results. This has been a sad day for the sport of boxing. How can any sport grow when you have inept officials running it?
on June 10,2012 | 04:52PM
hawnpunch wrote:
Those 2 judges should be banned from boxing!
on June 10,2012 | 06:16PM
Charliegrunt wrote:
Agree! Based on CompuBox, and everyone, except those two judges, it was no contest. Kizer should be asked to step down, and the two judges should b removed as incompetent. A close fight, OK. Not this one.
on June 11,2012 | 07:27AM
sonnyboy wrote:
I'm interested tyo know how many championship fights these two judges before, becuase they were clearly way off base . The last few rounds you could see bradley throwing pattycakes and running. A true champ is the aggressor, Pacquiao was. The third judge had it right, one sided points to Pacquiao. A rematch would be a total beating of bradley. Let's get it on!!
on June 10,2012 | 06:31PM
2_centz wrote:
This comment has been deleted.
on June 10,2012 | 09:12PM
braddahkeems wrote:
yeah, they were ringside but we see the video and we can pause it and recount all the punches and still have Pacquiao winning...we got the better view, power of technology !!! Put your 2-centz somewhere else like maybe xbox...some ignorant no common sense people now days but everyone has their opinion !!!
on June 11,2012 | 03:04PM
motoxdad wrote:
Note to the editor, please use your spell check.
on June 11,2012 | 07:03AM
kimotherapy2 wrote:
Was the fight fixed by the officials to secure employment for a rematch?
on June 11,2012 | 08:17AM
Descartes22 wrote:
What a farce. Pacquiao won at least 10 of the 12 rounds. All the experts and prognosticators had him handily winning the bout. If you watched the fight (after Game 7) like me, then you should have been disgusted. This is just another marker of boxing's downward spiral in the face of MMA's horizontal competition.
on June 11,2012 | 08:18AM
allie wrote:
true but that is why no onje can take boxing seriously anymore
on June 11,2012 | 10:29AM
braddahkeems wrote:
Its funny what that nutball said about all Judges should strive to get better, ummmmm these Judges are in the 70's and has lots of big fight experience so are you saying they are still learning to get better at judging???!! wow, i smell Bull sh@t giving an excuse for these Judges.I ain't buying Bob Arum too...I think things back fired on him...He's the ring leader in all of this...I studied the fight and it seemed like everyone seemed weird and not themselves, like they knew what the outcome was gonna be. We all can be deceived by this...Reminds me of 9/11 Trade center and the killing in waikiki McDonalds with a special off duty officer killing the civilian !!! Trying to cover up or hide something !!!
on June 11,2012 | 03:00PM
Breaking News