Thursday, July 31, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Belarus shot putter stripped of Olympic gold

By Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 03:52 a.m. HST, Aug 14, 2012

LONDON » Shot putter Nadzeya Ostapchuk of Belarus became the first athlete to be stripped of a medal at the London Olympics after her gold was withdrawn Monday for doping.

Valerie Adams of New Zealand was awarded the gold and Evgeniia Kolodko of Russia was bumped up to silver. Fourth-place finisher Gong Lijiao of China was moved up to bronze.

The International Olympic Committee said Ostapchuk tested positive for the steroid metenolone. She won the shot put exactly a week earlier. The IOC said she was tested the day before her competition and again following the event. Both samples were positive.

"The (Olympic committee) of Belarus is ordered to return to the IOC, as soon as possible, the medal, diploma and medallist pin awarded to the athlete in relation to the above-noted event," the IOC said in a statement.

The announcement came hours after the flame was extinguished at the closing ceremony with athletes and officials heading out of London. A day earlier, IOC President Jacques Rogge had proclaimed the fight against doping a success.

The Belarus team had already sent home hammer thrower Ivan Tsikhan because of suspicions over a sample provided after his silver-medal performance at the 2004 Athens Games.

Besides Ostapchuk, only one athlete tested positive for a banned substance after competing. U.S. judo fighter Nick Delpopolo was cited for traces of marijuana in his urine sample.

He blamed "inadvertent consumption" of food baked with the substance. The IOC disqualified him from seventh place in the 73-kilogram class.

Seven more were caught in doping controls conducted since the official testing period for the games began July 16. One of the seven competed in London before her test result was known.

"I think that is a sign that the system works," Rogge said Sunday. "I am happy about the fact that we could catch athletes who cheated, both before the games and at the games."

The IOC had said this would be its most extensive Olympic anti-doping program. It took almost 6,000 urine and blood samples, including no-notice tests ahead of athletes competing.

Rogge cautioned that some samples are still being analyzed and "we might hear something tomorrow or the day after. Hopefully not, but you never know."

Syrian runner Ghfran Almouhamad tested positive for the stimulant methylhexaneamine two days before her 400-meter hurdles heat. She placed eighth and was eliminated before the IOC disqualified her.

Until this latest turn of events, the London Games were set to end with medal standings in all 302 events unaltered by doping scandals.

Three Beijing events were tainted during the games, and two more medals were changed months later when a new test for the blood-booster CERA was introduced. The signature men's 1,500-meter gold medal was stripped from Rashid Ramzi of Bahrain.

Rogge reminded that the IOC will store all samples from London and can reanalyze them, revise results and reallocate medals until the statute of limitations expires in August 2020.

"When there is no new tests, we wait until the last moment; if there is a breakthrough new test, we'll test immediately," he said.

Indeed, the next Olympic doping scandal could be from the 2004 Athens Games instead. Next week the IOC could announce up to five new disciplinary cases based on retested samples.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
cojef wrote:
National shame to allow athletes who use performance enhancing drugs in world competition. Only shame results as test will be performed. It's a shame that athletes must be tested. What happened to national pride? No accolades only boos.
on August 13,2012 | 09:16AM
Why do people "CHEAT" to win? Why so dishonest. If you win, it was by cheating and you cheat only yourself. How can you claim that you are the Best of the Best.
on August 13,2012 | 10:03AM
Anonymous wrote:
Why do people cheat in Olympics? It's THE PRIZE! Not just the medal and glory, but in many countries, Olympic medalists, especially gold medal winners, are set for life financially.
on August 16,2012 | 06:53AM
Holomua wrote:
The testing was not a success. They didn't catch the Chinese.
on August 13,2012 | 12:21PM
loquaciousone wrote:
Why what's wrong with a woman swimmer posting a better 50 meter time than the fastest men time? It happens all the time. Next year, they'll make her swim against the men when her five-o-clock shadow starts appearing at 8 in the morning.
on August 13,2012 | 12:37PM
environmental_lady wrote:
I wish gold medal ceremonies would be delayed until the athletes could be tested for performance enhancing substances on the spot. It's little solace for the followup performers not to be recognized world-wide on the podium for the medals they do deserve. IOC needs to revise its testing procedures so that immediate feedback can be provided. It's so unfair to the honest athletes!
on August 13,2012 | 02:26PM
protector wrote:
Absolutely spot on!
on August 13,2012 | 04:16PM
protector wrote:
It's ridiculous to say you'll keep samples until 2020. Does that mean if you don't like a competitor and DON'T find anything wrong right now that you'll keep testing every year until you come up with something incriminating? Get real! That sounds like what's happening with Lace armstrong where they're coming up with stuff 7 or more years after the events themselves. They caught others from different countries during that same period and couldn't find anything to stick back then for Armstrong. NOW they do? Sounds like a trumped-up frame job. How could the blood samples (esp. in doping cases) not deteriorate after several years? I can understand steroids possibly leaving a trace...but doping??
on August 13,2012 | 04:22PM
Breaking News
Political Radar
`Toss up’

Political Radar

Political Radar
Hilton; Plaza Club

Political Radar
Direct mail

Political Radar
Direct mail

Aperture Cafe
Ramadan #latergram