Quantcast

Sunday, July 27, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Analysts: Recession likely without budget accord

By Alan Fram

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 08:48 a.m. HST, Aug 22, 2012



WASHINGTON >> A new recession is likely if a stalemate over tax and spending cuts continues between Democrats and Republicans, according to dire projections by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office on one of the this year's defining campaign issues.

In its annual summertime report, the budget office said Wednesday that letting decade-old tax cuts expire and sweeping spending cuts occur in January — which will happen without congressional action — "would lead to economic conditions in 2013 that will probably be considered a recession."

If that happened, the economy would contract by 0.5 percent — a gloomier projection than the budget office made earlier this year when it envisioned slight growth under that scenario. Unemployment would rise to around 9 percent by late next year if the standoff persists, the analysts said, with budget office Director Douglas Elmendorf telling reporters that failing to resolve it would cost 2 million jobs.

"I think the stakes of fiscal policy are very high right now," Elmendorf said at a briefing, adding, "We have very serious budget challenges and very serious economic challenges in this country."

The budget office's latest warning came amid an election year in which neither President Barack Obama nor congressional Republicans have shown any signs of giving ground in their protracted battle over taxes, spending and the budget. The lethargic economy and massive federal deficits are top-flight issues in this year's campaigns.

Obama wants to renew expiring tax cuts for everyone except individuals earning over $200,000 and couples who bring in above $250,000. Republicans are demanding that all tax cuts be extended. The two sides also have made no progress over how to prevent budget-wide spending cuts from taking effect. These automatic cuts were sat in motion by the failure of lawmakers last year to reach a bipartisan debt-reduction agreement.

Both sides were quick to blame the other for their standoff, with the White House saying it is time for the Republican-led House to approve tax cuts for all but the nation's highest earners.

"They're willing to hold the middle class hostage unless we also give massive new tax cuts to millionaires and billionaires — tax cuts we can't afford that would do nothing to strengthen the economy," White House spokesman Jay Carney said in a written statement.

The No. 2 House Republican leader said it was Obama who must bend

"The president's push for higher taxes on small businesses and failure to prevent devastating defense cuts threaten our national security, jobs and economic growth," said Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., citing GOP claims that boosting levies on the wealthy will make it harder for them to create jobs.

According to Wednesday's budget office report, letting the tax cuts continue and preventing the spending cuts from taking effect would leave a deficit next year of just over $1 trillion. If the reverse occurs, the shortfall would be $641 billion — in effect sucking roughly $400 billion out of a U.S. economy that is already struggling.

Though continuing the tax cuts and blocking the spending cuts would produce higher economic growth over the next two years, "it would reduce output and income in the longer run and is ultimately unsustainable," the budget office warned.

Wednesday's report projected a $1.1 trillion federal deficit for 2012, the fourth straight year the government's shortfall will exceed $1 trillion.

It also envisions an economy recovering at only a modest pace the rest of this year, growing at an annual rate of 2.25 percent.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(6)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Mythman wrote:
Barry will increase both spending and taxes in a second term. Two of his three potential "fathers" would have done the same: the one from Kenya, who was a communist himself and the one from back East who was a communist himself. The other father, from Indo, was not a communist. He was actually an anti-communist. Go figure. How can government pay for programs that address poverty, like rail, without increasing taxes to raise revenue with which to do so.
on August 22,2012 | 05:29AM
Grimbold wrote:
Headed to catastrophy with that deficit. It is already unavoidable.
on August 22,2012 | 07:52AM
Pacej001 wrote:
Raising taxes, on anyone, during a recession is just plain boneheaded, a guaranteed way to lower GDP and growth in employment. But, hey, what's more important? a return to recession or punishing the evil rich (making $250K makes you rich? What if you're in debt up to your okole starting a business. Never mind, thinking required.) with a tax that will shave a whopping .5% off of our national debt (IF Obama controls spending, which he isn't doing).
on August 22,2012 | 08:38AM
Pacej001 wrote:
Raising taxes, on anyone, during a recession is just plain boneheaded, a guaranteed way to lower GDP and growth in employment. But, hey, what's more important? a return to recession or punishing the evil rich (making $250K makes you rich? What if you're in debt up to your okol@ starting a business. Never mind, thinking required.) with a tax that will shave a whopping .5% off of our national debt (IF Obama controls spending, which he isn't doing).
on August 22,2012 | 08:38AM
WKAMA wrote:
Eric Cantor claims boosting levies on the wealthy will make it harder for them to create jobs. Well, levies haven't been made on the well-to-do yet so where are the jobs the wealthy are suppose to be creating?
on August 22,2012 | 10:59AM
Pacej001 wrote:
answer: They are buried under the blanket of uncertainty created by Obamacare, excessive regulation (EPA, especially), goofy government interference in the economy, and repeated threats to raise taxes on job creators. Given this foolishness from the Obama administration, it's no wonder businesses are sitting on their hands.
on August 22,2012 | 11:31AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout

Wassup Wit Dat!
Can You Spock ‘Em?

Warrior Beat
Meal plan

Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War