Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Japanese, Chinese ships exchange island warnings

By Malcolm Foster

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 10:16 a.m. HST, Sep 14, 2012


TOKYO >> Chinese and Japanese government ships exchanged warnings today in waters near disputed islands in the East China Sea, while Tokyo called on Beijing to protect its citizens amid anti-Japan protests and reported assaults in China.

Tensions between the Asian giants have flared anew after the Japanese government bought the islands from their private Japanese owners this week. The uninhabited islands, claimed by both countries as well as Taiwan, have become a rallying point for nationalists on both sides.

In response to Japan's purchase, China today sent six surveillance ships into what Japan says are its territorial waters around the islands, called Senkaku by Japan and Diaoyu by China. Japanese coast guard ships radioed warnings to the Chinese vessels and two or three moved out of the territorial waters, said Yasuhiko Oku, a Japanese coast guard official.

Japan controls the islands, which are surrounded by rich fishing grounds and are near key shipping lanes, but China doesn't recognize those claims. State-controlled China Central Television repeatedly played footage of a Chinese Marine Surveillance officer aboard one of the ships radioing the Japanese vessels to demand they leave.

"The actions of your ships violate China's sovereignty and rights," the officer was shown saying. "Any unilateral act from your side regarding the Diaoyu islands and its affiliated islands is illegal and invalid. Please stop any infringing acts. Otherwise, your side will bear the consequences caused by your actions."

With a typhoon approaching the area, by this afternoon all six Chinese ships had left the 24-mile zone around the islands, said Yoshiyuki Terakado, another Japanese Coast Guard official.

Emotions have been running high since April, when Tokyo's nationalistic governor, Shintaro Ishihara, proposed buying and developing the islands so that they wouldn't fall into Chinese hands. Activists from both sides landed on the islands in August.

To block Ishihara's plan, which would have infuriated China, Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda's government was left with little choice but to buy the islands. The government doesn't plan to develop them, but the move has still angered China, and Beijing has warned of "serious consequences."

Anti-Japanese protests have since been held in various Chinese cities, and state media has published calls for a boycott of Japanese goods.

The dispute has stirred up emotional memories of Japan's brutal occupation that ended only at the close of World War II. While Japan routinely apologizes for its wartime actions, its politicians often anger China by visiting the Yasukuni Shrine, a memorial to Japan's war dead, including top war criminals.

The Japanese Consulate in Shanghai reported on its website that several Japanese have been assaulted or harassed in the past few weeks. It said Chinese have thrown water bottles and hurled insults at Japanese walking on the street. One person was hit with soda by a Chinese person who shouted "Japanese!" A consular official said more than four people had been hurt in anti-Japanese attacks in the Shanghai area.

Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Osamu Fujimura called on Beijing to take steps to assure the safety of Japanese tourists and residents in China.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei said while Chinese were upset with "violations of Chinese sovereignty," they had no problem with "Japanese people in general." He urged Chinese to "express demands legally and reasonably."

While visiting Australia, Japanese Foreign Minister Koichiro Gemba told reporters that "we should never let the situation escalate," and expressed "strong hopes for the Chinese government to respond to the situation in an appropriate and also a calm manner."

Officials both in Tokyo and Beijing maintained that they had the right to send ships to the islands.

China's foreign ministry said its decision to send its ships was part of legal "law enforcement and patrol activities aimed to demonstrate China's jurisdiction over the Diaoyu Islands."

Fujimura called the fleet's deployment an unprecedented violation of Japanese territory and "extremely regrettable." Japan summoned China's ambassador to lodge a protest.

Chinese Assistant Foreign Minister Le Yucheng said Japanese authorities have let the situation escalate by appeasing and giving free rein to 'trouble-making right-wing forces' at home.

Le catalogued incidents earlier this year that he said were provocations, including a fishing trip to waters around the islands by Japanese lawmakers and a visit to the islands by right-wing activists to mourn war dead.

"Japan's 'purchase of the islands' is by no means an isolated event," Le told more than a dozen Chinese scholars at a symposium on the history of the islands held in a Beijing government compound. "It is a result of the changing political climate in Japan. There is a sinister tendency inside Japan that is taking Japan and China-Japan relations down an extremely dangerous road."

———

Associated Press Writers Alexa Olesen and Gillian Wong in Beijing and Mari Yamaguchi and Elaine Kurtenbach in Tokyo contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(9)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
cojef wrote:
Shades of another war caused by the sinking of warships, Maine, Panay, and Lusitania. These skirmishes have no beneficial results other than conflicts. The mere presence is enough to express beleigency, and usually result in the sinking and the loss of life. Nothing accomplished other than to express displeasure which other. Diplomacy be damm.
on September 14,2012 | 09:44AM
Anonymous wrote:
Both countries cannot afford to go to war over a remote piece of rock. It will die down in a few days. U.S.A...don't get involved! Let them settle among themselves, it is none of our business. We have enough headache back home.
on September 14,2012 | 09:58AM
al_kiqaeda wrote:
This is much more than a remote piece of rock. It's about national boundries and security, shipping lanes and coveted fishing grounds. The US did the same thing with another remote piece of rock for its security. We live on it.
on September 14,2012 | 10:52AM
false wrote:
Wrong. They may be uninhabited rocks sticking way out in the sea but that is how a country's international territorial boundary is measured. Try connecting all the most furthest owned ocean territory around any nation exposed to the sea. Then add an additional 24 sea miles to the perimeter. That whole area inside the expanded perimeter then can be claimed under international law as it's own to fish, navigate, cultivate. Rocks to some but livelihood to others. That's the importance.
on September 14,2012 | 01:21PM
Ewaduffer wrote:
Japan and Korea have a similar dispute over islands. What a mess this can turn out to be.
on September 14,2012 | 10:29AM
medigogo wrote:
Neighbors often ignore their common goods and get inflamed with a small stake in between. Both need to grow up and put their emotion somewhere else.
on September 14,2012 | 10:44AM
HD36 wrote:
China is starting to sell US Treasuries. The yield is starting to rise fast. With the US crippled economically, it will be unfeasible to protect Japan, even though they are buying Treasuries at their fastest rate in years. Soon, there will be nobody left for the US to borrow from.
on September 14,2012 | 10:51AM
dalawyer wrote:
This comment has been deleted.
on September 14,2012 | 12:54PM
HD36 wrote:
I think Japan will blink first. They don't stand a chance against China in a military confrontation. They rely on America's military might for national defense. As interest rates start to rise, it will be impossible to pay the interest on the 16 trillion dollar debt. If we back Japan, China can simply stop buying the bonds, or start selling them and flood the market with dollars. About the only good thing to come to America is that the resulting inflation will cause food to go up so much that many of the fat and obese will lose weight.
on September 14,2012 | 03:04PM
sailfish1 wrote:
Is "slant eye nations" supposed to be a derogatory term?
on September 15,2012 | 12:00PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
Phased in

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa

Career Changers
Must Sea TV

Political Radar
HB 1700 — Day 4

Political Radar
Pass

Warrior Beat
Hammer time