Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

U.S. concerned about Afghan insider attacks, says defense secretary

By Lolita c. Baldor

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 04:18 a.m. HST, Sep 18, 2012



BEIJING » U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Tuesday the U.S. is concerned about the impact insider attacks are having on its forces in Afghanistan.

But he insisted Gen. John Allen, the top U.S. commander there, is taking necessary steps to protect the force while still ensuring the U.S. will be able to hand over security to the Afghans and be able to withdraw by the end of 2014.

Panetta did not specifically address the dramatic action taken Monday by Allen, as NATO decided to temporarily scale back its operations with Afghan security forces in order to lower the risk of them turning their guns on American and allied forces.

Instead, he argued that the attacks do not mean the Taliban is getting stronger. “I think what it indicates is that they are resorting to efforts that try to strike at our forces, try to create chaos but do not in any way result in their regaining territory that has been lost,” he told reporters during a press conference in Beijing with China’s minister of national defense, Gen. Liang Guanglie.

Until now, U.S. and NATO troops routinely conducted operations with their Afghan counterparts. But under the new order, such operations for now will require the approval of a regional commander.

NATO’s decision reflected escalating worries about the insider attacks, coupled with the widespread tensions over an anti-Islam video that has prompted protests in Afghanistan and as many as 20 other countries around the world.

Panetta, however, has suggested that the insider attacks represent a risk of war that must not impede the overall goals.

“Every day when you are engaged in war, there are serious risks that confront those who fight the war,” Panetta said Monday. “We will do all we can to minimize those risks but we will not lose sight of the fundamental mission here, which is to continue to proceed to assure a peaceful transition to Afghan security and governance.”

In a separate statement issued after the press conference, Pentagon press secretary George Little said the changes in joint operations “will often be short notice and based to the latest information.” And he said the operations will always be conducted “in a manner that mitigates risks to our troops and ensures mission success.”

Early Tuesday, a suicide bomber rammed a car packed with explosives into a minibus carrying foreign aviation workers to the airport in the Afghan capital, Kabul, killing at least nine people. The Islamist militant group Hizb-i-Islami claimed responsibility for the dawn attack, saying it was revenge for the anti-Islam video.

So far this year, 51 international troops have been killed by Afghan forces or militants wearing their uniforms. The attacks have spiked in recent months, damaging the trust between the NATO and Afghan forces at a time when ongoing training and cooperation are critical in order for allied troops to leave Afghanistan by the end of 2014 and turn control of security over to the Afghan forces.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(2)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
cojef wrote:
Seems like we have to lose more lives before we pull out from a country whose population do not care for us to stay. It has been a long struggle with no signs that we will prevail over their steadfastness for Islam. Call it what you want, but the real facts are that democratic ideals is in conflict with their Islamic ideals. Acceptance of "western culture" is impossible when it is in conflict their religious idealism. It is even prevading in our country, where Islam is the fasting growing religion, if you can call it that, and affecting our political process, where it is mandatory for us to turn our cheeks to accomodate their religious fervor, right in the streets of Manhattan during their prayer sessions.
on September 18,2012 | 04:56AM
Grimbold wrote:
To work with the enemy is like to work with Afghans - any kind Muslims. How incompetent are our leaders - Obama on top- to allow our men to be shot like that? Any child in Afghanistan knows better, namely that all the forces, police etc are heavily infiltrated by hostile forces. They hate us, our culture , everything - all they want is our money. I also wished nobody from Arab and Muslim countries would be allowed to immigrate.We owe those Muslims the miserable time stealing controls at the airports.
on September 18,2012 | 06:43AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
Phased in

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa

Political Radar
Palolo v. Pauoa

Career Changers
Must Sea TV

Political Radar
HB 1700 — Day 4

Political Radar
Pass

Warrior Beat
Hammer time