Thursday, July 31, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Pot could be tax windfall, but skeptics abound

By Jonathan J. Cooper and Kristen Wyatt

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 10:04 a.m. HST, Sep 19, 2012

DENVER » A catchy pro-marijuana jingle for Colorado voters considering legalizing the drug goes like this: "Jobs for our people. Money for schools. Who could ask for more?"

It's a bit more complicated than that in the three states — Colorado, Oregon and Washington — that could become the first to legalize marijuana this fall.

The debate over how much tax money recreational marijuana laws could produce is playing an outsize role in the campaigns for and against legalization — and both sides concede they're not really sure what would happen.

At one extreme, pro-pot campaigners say it could prove a windfall for cash-strapped states with new taxes on pot and reduced criminal justice costs.

At the other, state government skeptics warn legalization would lead to costly legal battles and expensive new bureaucracies to regulate marijuana.

In all three states asking voters to decide whether residents can smoke pot, the proponents promise big rewards, though estimates of tax revenue vary widely:

— Colorado's campaign touts money for school construction. Ads promote the measure with the tag line, "Strict Regulation. Fund Education." State analysts project somewhere between $5 million and $22 million a year. An economist whose study was funded by a pro-pot group projects a $60 million boost by 2017.

— Washington's campaign promises to devote more than half of marijuana taxes to substance-abuse prevention, research, education and health care. Washington state analysts have produced the most generous estimate of how much tax revenue legal pot could produce, at nearly $2 billion over five years.

— Oregon's measure, known as the Cannabis Tax Act, would devote 90 percent of recreational marijuana proceeds to the state's general fund. Oregon's fiscal analysts haven't even guessed at the total revenue, citing the many uncertainties inherent in a new marijuana market. They have projected prison savings between $1.4 million and $2.4 million a year if marijuana use was legal without a doctor's recommendation.

"We all know there's a market for marijuana, but right now the profits are all going to drug cartels or underground," said Brian Vicente, a lawyer working for Colorado's Campaign To Regulate Marijuana Like Alcohol.

But there are numerous questions about the projections, and since no state has legalized marijuana for anything but medical purposes, the actual result is anyone's guess.

Among the problems: No one knows for certain how many people are buying black-market weed. No one knows how demand would change if marijuana were legal. No one knows how much prices would drop, or even what black-market pot smokers are paying now, though economists generally use a national estimate of $225 an ounce based on self-reported prices compiled online.

"It's difficult to size up a market even if it's legal, certainly if it's illegal," said Jeffrey Miron, a Harvard University economist who has studied the national tax implications of the legalization of several drugs.

In Colorado, the $60 million figure comes from Christopher Stiffler, an economist for the nonpartisan Colorado Center on Law & Policy. He looked at the state's potential marijuana market in a study funded by the pro-legalization Drug Policy Alliance. The figure comes from a combination of state and local taxes and projected savings to law enforcement.

Marijuana smokers and dealers, he argued, pay a premium now because the drug is illegal, and if government can find a way to capture that excess, tax collections should rise.

"You can basically take advantage of economies of scale, and the price of marijuana will go down and government can come in and capture the difference," Stiffler said.

The biggest unknown: Would the federal government allow marijuana markets to materialize?

When California voters considered marijuana legalization in 2010, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder warned that the federal government would not look the other way and allow a state marijuana market in defiance of federal drug law. Holder vowed a month before the election to "vigorously enforce" federal marijuana prohibition. Voters rejected the measure.

Holder hasn't been as vocal this year, but that could change. In early September, nine former heads of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration called on Holder to issue similar warnings to Colorado, Oregon and Washington.

That political uncertainty could translate into states spending thousands of dollars to defend the laws, critics say.

"I think it's important that this ballot lay out for the voters how much litigation is going to result from this," said Colorado assistant Attorney General Michael Dougherty, a critic of the legislation.

Legalization proponents counter that some of the 17 medical-marijuana states already collect pot taxes in violation of federal law, which does not condone medical use of the drug. Colorado collects several million dollars a year in pot-related taxes, including sales taxes, licensing fees and fees paid by patients to acquire the drug. Oregon last year doubled the cost of a medical marijuana card to raise money for things like clean water and school health programs.

"Marijuana can be regulated, can be taxed, can be sold. We're doing it now, just currently to sick people," said Vicente, the lawyer working on the Colorado legalization campaign.

Backers concede there are big questions about how marijuana would be taxed and regulated, but they are hoping to sell voters on taking the chance.

"We're like Star Trek. We're heading into a new world," said Art Way of the Drug Policy Alliance, answering tax questions recently posed by law students gathered at the University of Denver to learn about Colorado's initiative.

In the end, voters deciding the marijuana questions won't be making up their minds based on the impact on taxes, said Miron, the Harvard economist.

"It's small potatoes," Miron said of marijuana's tax implications. "I'm as firmly in the pro-legalization camp as anybody in the world, but it's because I think smoking marijuana is not the government's business.

"That is the question — not whether it will produce revenue, but whether these drugs should be legal."

Cooper reported from Salem, Ore.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 9 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
bender wrote:
Legalize all they like but it will still remain a federal crime. And who says they'll collect taxes. There will still be plenty of backyard growers and they ain't going to mail it in.
on September 19,2012 | 10:34AM
NITRO08 wrote:
Making pot legal would save tax payers money. How much money went into trying to stop growers in the billions! YES SOME PEOPLE WOULD GROW IT BUT MOST PEOPLE WOULD JUST BUY IT IT'S!
on September 19,2012 | 11:56AM
Hugo wrote:
A local study by U. of Hawaii, many years ago, found that IF marijuana was legal, and IF marijuana could be legally exported, Hawaii could get rid of the tourism industry and get rid of the military and everybody would have lots of money. The Advertiser reported this story and has the story in their "morgue". I suspect that UH has a copy of the study.
on September 19,2012 | 10:58AM
sailfish1 wrote:
Really? So Hawaii can be a rich state like Alaska (its oil) and, instead of taxing people, can actually pay people from the profits each year? It may even bring in more tourists. Wow! We may even be able to build 2-3 more rail lines (Mililani, Hawaii Kai, etc.).
on September 19,2012 | 11:55AM
all_fed_up wrote:
Let everybody grow their own, legally. This idiotic war against drugs sure isn't working. All it's doing is making some people very, very rich. 1) All the Mexican cartels go out of business. 2) Drug fueled crimes, (thefts, burglaries, ice head violence, etc.) go down. They don't have to steal to get money to buy. Just go in the back yard and pick some. 3) They'll be lots more chubby, smiling cruisers, versus tweaked out chronic mental cases out on the streets.
on September 19,2012 | 11:01AM
Lanikaula wrote:
THE 3 WORST DRUGS: Rx pills, Tobacco & Alcohol. ALL support the Pharmaceutical/Surgical industries that with the help of the Fed AG & the control of media by the Hearst Dynasty along with the chemical company, DuPont THEY made it very INEXPENSIVE NATURAL product ILLEGAL throughout the WHOLE WORLD by passing laws locally, nationally & internationally banning ANY FORM of cannabis...this is about the BOTTOM LINE: $$$$$$
on September 19,2012 | 11:29AM
goodday wrote:
None of my friends that smoked pot made it through college. They should do a study to see how much lower your chances are of getting through college when you smoke pot.
on September 19,2012 | 12:10PM
waverider808 wrote:
i suspect your friends would not have finished college regardless of the situation. can't blame pakalolo for one's own shortcomings...
on September 19,2012 | 12:57PM
Bully wrote:
The State of Hawaii acts like they dont need the money that the legalization of pot would generate but the fact is we are desperate for the money but too stupid to ever make it happen.
on September 19,2012 | 01:35PM
Breaking News
Political Radar
`Toss up’

Political Radar

Political Radar
Hilton; Plaza Club

Political Radar
Direct mail

Political Radar
Direct mail

Aperture Cafe
Ramadan #latergram