Quantcast
  

Wednesday, April 16, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Romney's Medicare plan raises cost questions

By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 03:16 p.m. HST, Oct 05, 2012


WASHINGTON » Mitt Romney's Medicare plan won't try to control costs by limiting the payments that future retirees would use to buy private health insurance, aides say, adding detail to a proposal from the GOP presidential nominee that has both intrigued and confused many Americans.

Reining in costs is vital to keeping Medicare affordable, and in their plans both President Barack Obama and Romney's running mate, Paul Ryan, set limits on the growth of future spending.

Independent experts say they doubt that Romney's Medicare plan can succeed without some kind of hard spending limit; Romney campaign officials say the savings will come through competition among health insurance plans.

"It sounds like Romney is trying to have it both ways," said Robert Bixby, executive director of the Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan group advocating to reduce government deficits. "It's a really important point whether there will be a cap. It will help determine whether the health care savings he's touting are credible."

For example, a President Romney would not be able to get credit for assumed savings through competition under the procedures currently used to analyze legislation by the all-important Congressional Budget Office. The nonpartisan budget referees might rule such a plan out of bounds, forcing Romney to accept a cap.

Bixby was a member of a Bipartisan Policy Center group that last year produced a deficit reduction plan that, like Romney's, called for shifting Medicare from an open-ended benefit to a program that gives future retirees a fixed amount of money for health insurance. It included a cap on the growth of spending.

"Competition alone is very speculative," Bixby said. Competition hasn't solved the health care cost problem for employers, who increasingly have been shifting costs to workers and their families in the form of higher premiums and copays.

Medicare covers nearly 50 million retirees and disabled people. Since its creation in 1965, it has been an open-ended benefit program, with taxpayers basically paying all the bills that come in.

Obama's health care law begins to change that, creating a board with the power to force payment cuts on the health care industry if Medicare costs rise above certain limits.

Ryan's budget, passed by the House this year, also would limit the growth of total Medicare spending, using a formula that links to economic growth.

Romney has charged that Obama's approach would eventually lead to rationing.

Obama has "an unelected board ... to decide what kind of treatment you ought to have," Romney said during Wednesday night's presidential debate in Denver. The board is prohibited by law from rationing care.

Romney calls his own plan "premium support." Critics say it would amount to a cost shift.

Aides to the GOP candidate say the plan would rely on competition — without caps or a cost-cutting board — to control spending and avoid cost shifts to seniors.

Retirees entering the program in 2022 and later would have the choice of private insurance or a government plan modeled on traditional Medicare.

The private plans would bid to provide health care to seniors in a given part of the country. The government's payment would be pegged to the second-lowest bid, or the cost of the government plan, whichever was lower.

Seniors who chose a higher-cost plan would pay the difference. Those who picked lower-cost coverage could keep the difference for medical expenses. Low-income retirees and people in poor health would get a more generous government payment.

The Romney campaign refused repeated requests for an on-the-record explanation of the Medicare policy. Instead, spokeswoman Andrea Saul issued a statement extolling what she called "a plan that empowers patients and families with more choices and robust competition, reforms insurance markets with strong consumer protections, and proposes real entitlement reform that protects and strengthens Medicare for today's seniors and future generations."

Former U.S. Comptroller General David Walker, now a deficit-reduction advocate, said it's hard to understand how the Romney plan would work because so much of it remains fuzzy.

"I just don't know that we have enough details to meaningfully evaluate it at this point," Walker said. "People are trying to evaluate what the cost would be, but they just don't have enough facts to effectively evaluate it."







 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(4)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
ufried wrote:
KEEP TRYING!!!!
on October 5,2012 | 07:03AM
Poipounder808 wrote:
Mitt is just throwing anything against the wall to see what sticks. I am sure he will come out with three or four more plans before the elections.
on October 5,2012 | 09:44AM
EightOEight wrote:
Maybe Paul Ryan's mommy has the time to explain the plan?
on October 5,2012 | 10:49AM
lee1957 wrote:
There is nothing affordable on the table. Facts are most of us will grow old and require more health care as we age. We all will die eventually. The answers lie on the preventive side. One third of us are clinically obese, another third grossly overweight and on the way to obesity, 19% are smokers and 21% are ex smokers. The electorate is living in fantasyland if they think there is a magical, affordable government solution to save them from themselves.
on October 5,2012 | 11:27AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News