Monday, July 28, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

TSA lapses preceded Honolulu baggage failures, audit says

By Jeff Plungis

Bloomberg News

LAST UPDATED: 11:38 a.m. HST, Oct 09, 2012

Transportation Security Administration mistakes, including leaving explosive-detection equipment in a warehouse for more than two years, contributed to unscreened baggage being loaded onto planes at Honolulu International Airport for several months in 2010, a report said.

TSA managers struggled to implement changes in procedures and had too few screeners for the volume of luggage, the Homeland Security Department’s Inspector General said in a report released today. The agency doesn’t know how many bags went unscreened, the report said.

“This report and one TSA fiasco after another have demonstrated that this isn’t the problem of a few bad apples,” U.S. Representative John Mica, a Florida Republican who requested the review, said in a statement. “There are system- wide problems with this massive bureaucracy.”

The Honolulu airport is the nation’s 29th-largest by passenger traffic. The investigation started with an internal TSA review after a whistle-blower alerted the agency that unscreened bags were being put on flights, the report said. More than 40 employees, including the top security official at the airport, were fired or suspended.

While individual employees were primarily responsible for the security lapses, TSA management contributed to the situation by changing procedures frequently, failing to deploy enough staff and not deploying equipment that would have made screening easier, the inspector general said.

Explosive-detection machines were requested by airport officials in August 2008, the report said. TSA informed the airport in 2009 that the equipment would arrive in 18 months. The machines arrived in December 2010 as an inspector general audit began, the report said.

TSA’s initial investigation at Honolulu focused on the behavior of individuals and not whether systemic shortcomings may have been to blame, Mica said. The agency said Honolulu was the only airport where screening procedures weren’t followed, without showing the inspector general evidence it had reviewed other airports, the Florida Republican said.

The inspector general looked at airport management in response to a request from Mica and Representative Jason Chaffetz, a Utah Republican.

TSA disagrees with the inspector general’s conclusion that better implementation of screening-procedure changes could have prevented the violations of security protocol, Administrator John Pistole said in a response attached to the report. The loading of unscreened luggage in Honolulu became “almost normal practice,” Pistole wrote.

“The willful nature of the officers’ violations and the lack of sufficiently diligent management oversight, does not support the conclusion,” Pistole wrote.

More From The Star-Advertiser

2 Congressmen call for Honolulu TSA probe

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Hapa_Haole_Boy wrote:
This article does not point out that the former Honolulu TSA head, although fired, subsequently settled with the TSA for wrongful termination. A news report was made on KITV about the settlement.
on October 9,2012 | 12:39PM
kainalu wrote:
Fear mongering.
on October 9,2012 | 01:07PM
808warriorfan wrote:
on October 9,2012 | 01:26PM
cojef wrote:
Bureaucratic boo boo. The organization is so huge and expenditures to match that, the right hand does not know what it's counter part is doing. A prime example of equipment purchased and not put to use. Meanwhile National Security issues are being compromised, without relevance to costs incurred to protect public safety. Millions are being expended on equipment that seemed out of date when installed, necessitating procurement of newer equipment and the Taxpayers are footing the bill.
on October 9,2012 | 02:32PM
Breaking News