Quantcast

Sunday, July 27, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Forceful Raddatz draws praise as moderator

By David Bauder

AP Television Writer

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:44 p.m. HST, Oct 11, 2012


NEW YORK >> ABC's Martha Raddatz took a forceful approach to moderating the vice presidential debate on Thursday, winning many positive reviews from instant pundits on social media but some complaints from Republicans.

Her performance was a clear contrast to PBS' Jim Lehrer's work in last week's debate between President Obama and Mitt Romney. Lehrer let the presidential candidates talk almost freely, while Raddatz sought to be more specific and keep things under control.

Raddatz, a foreign policy correspondent at ABC News since 1999, was moderating her first vice presidential or presidential debate.

She stopped one exchange on the economy just at the point Vice President Joe Biden and GOP candidate Paul Ryan had descended into bickering.

"I want to move on to Medicare and entitlements," she said. "I think we've gone over this quite enough."

She twice pressed Ryan for proposals when the congressman said a Romney administration would work to close tax loopholes that benefit the wealthy. "No specifics again," she said when the Republican did not lay out an agenda.

"Can you guarantee this math will add up?" she asked.

Later, Raddatz drew Biden's ire during a discussion on the war in Afghanistan by asking him whether the Taliban is taking advantage of the Obama administration's timeline for ending the war. She also questioned whether U.S. troops were being pulled out for political or military reasons.

Twitter was alight with praise for Raddatz, including some suggestions that she run for vice president.

"Martha Raddatz is no joke," tweeted CNN anchor Don Lemon. "Following up and in charge."

But some Republicans suggested Raddatz was being too quick to cut off Ryan and allowing Biden to interrupt the Republican.

"Martha Raddatz is the worst moderator ever," Fox News Channel host Sean Hannity tweeted. "Maybe next time Paul Ryan should invite her to his wedding."

That was a reference to a story that circulated in conservative media earlier this week noting that when Raddatz married a Harvard law school student in 1991, one of the wedding guests was her new husband's fellow Harvard student and future president Barack Obama. Raddatz and her husband, Julius Genachowski, divorced six years later.

The social media scorecard for Raddatz became more predictable as the debate went on, as Slate magazine noted in one tweet: "Liberals think Martha Raddatz is the best debate moderator ever, conservatives think the worst." Relief or happiness among Democrats at Bidens'aggressive stance in contrast to Obama last week also seemed to affect opinions on Raddatz.

Toward the end of the debate, Raddatz introduced the issue of abortion with a personal, general question, asking the two Roman Catholic candidates how their faith affected their work in politics.

Her final question was whether either of the two candidates had ever been embarrassed by the tone of the campaign. That drew a rebuke from Karl Rove, whose American Crossroads super PAC helps fund anti-Obama advertising. Rove tweeted that Raddatz's question was "her own personal editorial."







 Print   Email   Comment | View 4 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(4)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
niimi wrote:
I'd say Radditz was overall a better moderator than Jim Lehrer; however, it seemed she embellished while in the role getting caught up on the discussion. It seemed at times she was debating Congressman Ryan. I thought it was spirited, feisty debate. Vice President Biden was unusually aggressive, to the point where I draw a likeness to the aggression that Al Gore displayed in his debate with George W. Bush back in 2000. VP Biden seemed to interrupt way too many times. What seemed to clinch it for me was the contrast in closing statements where Congressman Ryan seemed to put forth a clear, point by point summary of the Romney-Ryan position. VP Biden's closing was pretty good, but he seemed to get lost on his summary of the President's record. I'm really looking forward to the 2nd Presidential Debate. Meanwhile, I'd say Congressman Ryan edged VP Biden in this debate.
on October 11,2012 | 09:55PM
palani wrote:
Raddatz did a fair job at cloaking her bias, although I agree that she at times appeared to be debating Ryan. Why didn't she reprimand the boorish Biden, who came off as a smirky, immature third-grader, laughing and talking over Ryan the whole time? Biden was pugnacious but disrespectful of Ryan, the audience, and the process.

In addition to having entertained then Senator Obama at her 1991 wedding, her ex-husband Julius Genachowski was appointed by President Obama as Chair of the Federal Communications Commission in 2009. Bias? Nah, it's just your imagination!


on October 12,2012 | 07:17AM
Toneyuki wrote:
Yep she did ok as a moderator. She didn't show her liberal colors that I could see.
on October 11,2012 | 10:49PM
serious wrote:
She should have stopped Biden from talking while Ryan had the time. Ethics!!!
on October 12,2012 | 09:51AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout

Wassup Wit Dat!
Can You Spock ‘Em?

Warrior Beat
Meal plan

Volley Shots
Fey, Enriques on MJNT

Political Radar
Wilhelmina Rise, et al.

Court Sense
Cold War