Quantcast
  

Thursday, May 23, 2013         

 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Navy says submarine, Aegis cruiser collide

By Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 01:57 a.m. HST, Oct 15, 2012



NORFOLK, Va. >> The Pentagon said that it is investigating why a Navy submarine collided with an Aegis cruiser during routine operations at an undisclosed location.

The U.S. Fleet Forces Command said in a news release that the submarine USS Montpelier and the Aegis cruiser USS San Jacinto collided at about 3:30 p.m. Sunday. No one was injured, and the extent of any damage to the vessels was not clear Saturday evening, said Lt. Commander Brian Badura of the Fleet Forces Command.

"We have had circumstances where Navy vessels have collided at sea in the past, but they're fairly rare as to how often they do take place," Badura told The Associated Press.

Navy officials said the collision was under investigation, but declined to offer specifics on what happens next or on where the incident took place.

"If we do have an incident that does take place, there are folks that swing into action... to help us make a better, more conclusive explanation of exactly what happened," Badura said.

The news release says "overall damage to both ships is being evaluated," and that the sub's propulsion plant was "unaffected by the collision." Both Navy ships are based at Norfolk, Va. and are operating on their own power, the news release says.

___

Associated Press writer Norman Gomlak contributed to this report from Atlanta.






 Print   Email   Comment | View Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
999
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have read and agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. Any violations of these terms may result in account suspension or deactivation. Please keep your comments civil and in good taste. To report a comment, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
droid wrote:
“Last Resort”™ in real life?
on October 13,2012 | 06:29PM
Classic_59Chevy wrote:
This comment has been deleted.
on October 13,2012 | 06:38PM
cojef wrote:
Careers will be affected. Promotional opportunities for the future retarded, lost or even drummed out of the Navy.
on October 14,2012 | 09:48AM
jomama wrote:
clearly Obama's fault
on October 13,2012 | 07:26PM
HD36 wrote:
Proof we have more than enough war machines.
on October 13,2012 | 10:59PM
loio wrote:
Wow, what a brilliant comment. Not!
on October 14,2012 | 05:30AM
Classic_59Chevy wrote:
This comment has been deleted.
on October 14,2012 | 06:45AM
NITRO08 wrote:
Talking from experience defense needs to be cut a little too many private contractors ripping off the government wasting tax payers money. Mittens and Ryan don't have any experience with military matters! They want to give there buddy's in the defense industry more money!
on October 14,2012 | 10:57AM
Carang_da_buggahz wrote:
Right. And Obama had one term in the U.S. Senate and was a Community Organizer on his resume when elected. I find your assertion that Romney and Ryan have buddies in the defense industry quite laughable. Like a Liberal Lemming, you'll follow Obama the Pied Piper right off the fiscal cliff while ignoring the fact that Solyndra, et al, had contributed to Obama's campaign previously and got their loans as political payback. Now, the American taxpayers have been wronged yet again by the purveyor of "Hope" and "Change". Your argument falls flat on it's face and has exposed you as one clueless blind man being led by another. Grow a brain and quit drinking the Kool-Aid then MAYBE we'll take you seriously.
on October 14,2012 | 04:47PM
kailuabred wrote:
Only in a Star Advertiser forum could this topic turn into a politival debate...very lame.
on October 15,2012 | 04:10AM
SteveToo wrote:
You can NEVER have enough war machines. But you CAN have to few and get your butt kicked.
on October 14,2012 | 08:46AM
sailfish1 wrote:
With all the state-of-the-art electronic surveillance equipment on both the submarine and the cruiser, a collision is totally unacceptable. Both officers on watch and senior crewmen should be demoted and given land-based assignments.
on October 13,2012 | 11:23PM
Dragonman wrote:
You should wait until all the facts are made public before you throw the senior officers under the bus. Of course there is the possibility that the findings of the investigation will never be fully made public.
on October 14,2012 | 08:37AM
olos73 wrote:
Agree with that. Similar to the Ehime Maru and the Greenville sub collision years back. Open ocean, but submarine cannot locate an object in the immediate area. The sub was showing off for onboard visitors, but should've been able to locate Ehime Maru above.
on October 14,2012 | 08:39AM
SteveToo wrote:
You can NEVER have more than enough war machines, but you COULD have to few and lose.
on October 14,2012 | 08:47AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Those darn oceans are getting so small.
on October 14,2012 | 09:23AM
cojef wrote:
Careers ruined, even the possibilities of being requested to resign from the their command. Someone possibly at lowere rank goofed and the command will pay the price.
on October 14,2012 | 09:53AM
loquaciousone wrote:
I'm going out on a limb and saying that one of these commanders will soon be out of a job.
on October 15,2012 | 03:44AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News