Quantcast
  

Friday, April 18, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 11 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Eyes are on the voters in town hall-style debates

By Connie Cass

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 02:15 p.m. HST, Oct 15, 2012


WASHINGTON » The every-four-years ritual of a national "town hall" style debate began as a nerve-racking experiment in live television. Moderator Carole Simpson was so nervous about turning over the microphone to regular folks and their questions that she spent days mapping out the presidential candidates and their issues on "a zillion 3-by-5 cards," in case she had to take over the questioning herself.

"I was afraid these undecided voters from Richmond, Va., might get into this huge TV studio where they'd be seen by millions of people and they'd just freeze," the former ABC journalist recalls. "I wanted to be prepared."

No need to worry. The voters did fine. That "town hall" 20 years ago was such a hit that there's been one in every presidential election since.

The sixth will bring President Barack Obama and his Republican rival Mitt Romney to Hofstra University on New York's Long Island Tuesday night to take questions from undecided voters selected by the Gallup polling company.

Debate coach Brett O'Donnell, who worked with John McCain in 2008 and Romney during this year's primaries, says: "This is the one debate that belongs to the people."

It can be a tricky one for the candidates.

Obama, especially, needs a forceful showing to recover from his leaden performance in the campaign's first debate. But he must tread carefully in an atmosphere more suitable for share-your-pain moments than aggressive attacks.

"You can't have this sort of all-out slugfest at a town hall debate," O'Donnell said, so don't expect the fireworks of last week's Joe Biden-Paul Ryan vice presidential match.

Viewers want the candidates to show respect for those voters in the room, who stand in proxy for all Americans.

"You've got to connect with the person who's asking the question — look them in the eye," said Robert Denton Jr., head of the Communications Department at Virginia Tech. "It's about empathy and connection."

Romney comes to the arena strengthened by his first debate. And the people-first format gives him a unique chance to overcome a persistent weakness: suspicion among some voters that he's too wealthy to relate to the middle class and the poor. But if Romney fails to engage with his questioners, he could reinforce that impression.

That's what happened to President George H.W. Bush in the first televised town hall debate, a low moment in his failed 1992 re-election bid.

The three-way contest at the University of Richmond between Bush, Democrat Bill Clinton and independent Ross Perot stands unmatched as an example of the format's risks and rewards.

Bush was thrown by a woman's oddly worded question: How had the national debt personally affected the candidates? He stumbled through a meandering response, asked the woman to clarify and ended up sounding irritated and a bit argumentative: "Are you suggesting that if somebody has means the national debt doesn't affect them?"

Even worse, just as she began her question, TV cameras caught Bush checking his watch.

That gesture would be replayed over and again as evidence that the president was indifferent and out of touch. "I took a huge hit," Bush said years later.

When Clinton got his shot at the same question, he set the standard for town hall emoting.

Clinton crossed the stage to stand before the woman, locked her in his gaze, and recounted the economic pain he'd personally witnessed as governor of Arkansas. "He just burst through the TV set," Simpson recalls.

How did that first town hall come about? Not surprisingly, Bush had resisted the risky new idea. But Clinton pushed it in negotiations with Bush and the Commission on Presidential Debates because his campaign thrived on town hall-style events.

"It's the flesh and blood of America, so I love those things," Clinton later told Jim Lehrer of PBS. "And I loved that one."

Bush told Lehrer he hated debates, period.

Because candidates are free to walk about, town halls are body-language danger zones.

In 2000, Al Gore was ridiculed for striding unnaturally close to George W. Bush as his rival spoke. Bush deflected Gore with a surprised look and curt nod, to audience laughter. In 2008, comedians emphasized McCain's age by ridiculing the way he seemed to wander aimlessly about the stage while Obama talked.

Then there are the questions. They tend to be more straightforward and less pointed than those that journalists ask in debates. But they can be unpredictable. And while debaters often dodge a moderator's question by veering off to some other talking point, it's less acceptable to treat a citizen's query that way.

In 2004, President George W. Bush took heat for failing to come up with a specific mistake when a woman asked him to describe three wrong decisions. That town hall also tested the format's more civil tone with sharp exchanges over the Iraq War. John Kerry labeled Bush's campaign a "weapon of mass deception."

Town halls have lost some of their spontaneity. The 80 or so undecided voters chosen for Tuesday's event must submit their questions in advance and moderator Candy Crowley of CNN will decide which people to call on. She can pose her own follow-up questions.

In 1992, questions weren't screened beforehand. Simpson walked through the audience Oprah-style and a producer signaled which person to talk to next, seeking a good demographic mix. She had no idea what each person might ask.

"They were not the questions the media had been focusing on," said Simpson, who now teaches journalism at Emerson College in Boston. "They were asking about bread-and-butter issues that they were interested in — the education in their schools, the crime in their neighborhoods, the economy and jobs."

"We're still talking about the same things — the deficit, jobs, outsourcing," she said. "We'll probably hear some of the same subjects Tuesday."

Associated Press writer Larry Margasak contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 11 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(11)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Hullstown wrote:
"Clinton crossed the stage to stand before the woman, locked her in his gaze, and recounted the economic pain he'd personally witnessed as governor of Arkansas. "He just burst through the TV set," Simpson recalls." Hahahahahahaa!
on October 15,2012 | 06:58AM
calentura wrote:
Paula Jones was not so easily impressed.
on October 15,2012 | 08:40AM
loquaciousone wrote:
Every time I look at Romney's hair I expect him take off without his broom.
on October 15,2012 | 06:58AM
honolulugal wrote:
I just have to say, loquaciousone that I love readng your comments. Really clever stuff. I had to look up your tag name--"talkative one". Lol Well chosen. Except I didn't appreciate having to type it.. ;-)
on October 15,2012 | 08:31AM
peanutgallery wrote:
Voting for Obama is like begging to lose, only worse. He's a loser. Like Biden, Obama wouldn't know the truth if it bit him.
on October 15,2012 | 08:28AM
honolulugal wrote:
Well, if you're trying to get folks to agree with you, that's not the way to do it.
on October 15,2012 | 08:41AM
loquaciousone wrote:
If Romney doesn't watch out Big Bird might bite him where the sun don't shine.
on October 15,2012 | 09:31AM
tiki886 wrote:
"It's about empathy and connection."

Romney, as a Mormon Bishop, with more life experience, had to counsel many of his parishioners in personal family and monetary matters. He has governed a State that is 87% Democrat. He knows the meaning of charity and lives it.

Obama on the other hand is an academic with background as a community organizer. In a "Town Hall" setting you have to be prepared to answer unscripted and spontaneous questions that draw from personal experience in order to be believable and sincere. This will be an interesting debate.


on October 15,2012 | 12:28PM
tiki886 wrote:
Without his teleprompters as his crutch, Obama can't be caught looking down again at his shoes. He has to keep his head up and look people in the eye. Something that he is not used to. Notes are useless in this format as well. It will be an interesting debate.
on October 15,2012 | 12:37PM
serious wrote:
tiki886--Meet the Press, the Sunday after the debate was suggesting that he was looking at ideas given on his Blackberry--when he looked down, it was hidden by the podium. I thought the VP debate--the woman narrator lost complete control. One should not interrupt the other while they are talking. She should have silenced Biden. BTW--check her "D-liberal" record--how was was picked is beyond me.
on October 15,2012 | 01:07PM
toomuchpilikia wrote:
Oh Where Oh Where Did My Telepromter Go, Does Anyone Know Where It Is?????
on October 15,2012 | 01:06PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News