Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Boy Scouts host anti-abuse forum

By David Crary

AP National Writer

LAST UPDATED: 10:20 a.m. HST, Oct 31, 2012

Even as its past policies on sex-abuse prevention fuel controversy, the Boy Scouts of America is hosting an unprecedented closed-door symposium Thursday with other national youth organizations, hoping to share strategies to combat future abuse.

The 10 participating groups, including the Boys and Girls Clubs of America, the YMCA and Big Brothers Big Sisters, will hear presentations from some of the nation's top experts on child sex-abuse prevention. They also will discuss the sensitive topic of how uncorroborated information about potentially threatening adult volunteers might be shared among youth organizations.

Planning for the one-day session in Atlanta began late last year, part of long-standing efforts by the Boy Scouts to demonstrate a commitment to preventing the abuse problems that have bedeviled it and other youth groups over the decades.

The forum takes place just two weeks after the court-ordered release of confidential files compiled by the Scouts from 1959-85 with information about 1,200 alleged abusers in the ranks of its adult leaders.

Michael Johnson, a former police detective hired by the Scouts in 2010 as national director of youth protection, has been the key organizer of the symposium, calling it a "groundbreaking opportunity" for groups serving more than 17 million youngsters to discuss their shared challenges and anti-abuse strategies.

"Crazy as it sounds, this hasn't been done before," Johnson said.

One of the symposium's sessions will deal with the type of confidential files kept by the Boy Scouts since the 1920s, containing a range of verified and unverified allegations involving thousands of adults deemed to pose a threat of abuse.

The Scouts' policy — not always adhered to over the decades — is to share substantive allegations with law enforcement. Thursday's symposium will include discussion of whether, and how, these types of files might also be shared among youth groups even when the allegations are unproven.

"This information is an incredible tool that might be helpful to other organizations, but where is the legislation that allows this to be shared amongst us?" said Johnson. "We want kids to be safe. We don't mean to be defensive. But it is complicated."

The expert recruited to facilitate the symposium, Dr. Michael Haney of the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, said the question of information sharing is "a very gray area legally," raising questions with no easy answers.

"You may have enough information to know someone violated your policy, so you don't let him be a volunteer," Haney said. "How do we deal with that so that individual can't just walk around the corner and find another venue to have access to children?"

The session on information-sharing will be led by Suzanna Tiapula, director of the National District Attorneys Association's National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse.

She said the youth organizations needed to be wary of reports that appeared false or vindictive, but should be working on ways to share with other youth groups any information deemed serious enough to report to law enforcement.

"That's going to be delicate," she said. "They have a lot of issues, and they're trying to do it correctly."

She praised the steps taken by the Boy Scouts in recent years to improve their child-protection policies.

Some of those steps date back to the 1980s, while others followed the 2010 judgment by an Oregon jury ordering the Boy Scouts to pay $19.9 million in damages to Kerry Lewis, who had been abused in the 1980s by an assistant scoutmaster in Portland.

That's the case that led to the recent release of the Scouts' so-called "perversion files," prompting a pledge from the Scouts to re-examine the documents and identify instances when people within the organization knew about suspected abuse but failed to report it to authorities.

Within months of the Oregon judgment, the Scouts announced that all adult volunteers — now numbering 1.1 million — would be required to take child-protection training when they join the Scouts and repeat the training every two years. Last year, the Scouts stipulated that all adult staff are mandated to report suspected child abuse to law enforcement authorities and Scout leaders, even if this would not be required by state law.

Tiapula described the mandatory-reporting policy as excellent but said the Scouts needed to pursue a "massive education process" to ensure that the adult volunteers were knowledgeable about detecting potential abusers.

"There's quite a bit of work that they have to do," Tiapula said. "I think they know that."

Tiapula expressed regret that Thursday's symposium will be closed to the news media.

"It creates a sense there are things in the community that they can't be sharing," she said. "An open meeting conveys to the world they're doing the right thing."

However, Johnson and Haney said the closed-door policy was expected to encourage candid dialogue. Were the meeting to be open, Haney said, attorneys for the youth organizations might counsel participants to be cautious about discussing problems they face with youth-protection.

Symposium topics include the prevalence and prevention of child sexual abuse, the behavior of sex offenders and the growing threat of online predators.

Speakers include David Finkelhor, director of the University of New Hampshire's Crimes Against Children Research Center; Victor Vieth, executive director of the National Child Protection Training Center; and Kristen Anderson, executive director of training at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

The other participating youth groups are Girls Inc., USA Swimming, Camp Fire, the National Catholic Committee on Scouting, the American Youth Soccer Organization and The First Tee.

Conference organizers plan to summarize the conclusions of the meeting for a report that will be made available to other youth-serving organizations that did not participate.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 2 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
allie wrote:
sorry but this is a terrible organization. I cannot support it
on October 31,2012 | 10:22AM
nodaddynotthebelt wrote:
Since most of the offenders that have offended on the children passed the criminal background check it just shows how most offenders are not those lurking behind the bushes. It's people that the children know such as parents, teachers, boy scout leaders, summer fun leaders, babysitters, etc. These are the people that are statistically the ones who will offend on our children. That is why the registry for sex offenders is a waste of money. Those on the registry won't be hired for these positions. The ones that are hired are the ones who pass the criminal background checks. But we still see a lot of this kind of thing such as that karate instructor that offended on his students. Why? Because we don't teach our children to say "no" to certain type of behaviors. We as parents should take the time to teach our children that certain touching is not acceptable. We cannot assume that they will be taught those things by their teachers in school. One effective way to curtail offense on our children is putting potential teachers, scout leaders and camp leaders, etc, through a plethysmograph whereby the applicant has to go through a physical battery of tests to show whether he gets aroused to pictures of children. Any applicant that shows arousal would not be allowed to go any further. I know this would be controversial but if we want our children to be safe, then this would be very effective. Criminal background checks only give a false sense of security. The registry is only to appease parents who don't realize that most offenders on this registry have gone through treatment and are statistically shown to have a low re-offense rate. By doing this test we nip the whole thing in the bud (pun unintended).
on October 31,2012 | 10:46AM
Breaking News
Political Radar
`My side’

Political Radar
‘He reminds me of me’

Bionic Reporter
Needing a new knee

Warrior Beat
Monday musings

Small Talk
Burning money

Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout