Thursday, July 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 18 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

General with Hawaii ties demoted for lavish travel and spending

By Lolita C. Baldor

Associated Press

LAST UPDATED: 10:39 p.m. HST, Nov 13, 2012

WASHINGTON >> Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has demoted the former head of U.S. Africa Command who was accused of spending thousands of dollars on lavish travel and other unauthorized expenses, the Pentagon said Tuesday.

Panetta stripped Gen. William "Kip" Ward of a star, which means that he will now retire as a three-star lieutenant general. Ward also has been ordered to repay the government $82,000.

Ward commanded U.S. Army troops at Schofield Barracks in Hawaii from July 1999 until November 2000, when he was promoted to a job at the Pentagon.

Secretary of the Army John McHugh concurred with Panetta's decision, Pentagon press secretary George Little said in a statement Tuesday.

The demotion came after retired Army Gen. David Petraeus resigned as CIA director because of an extramarital affair and Marine Gen. John Allen was being investigated for potentially improper communications with a woman.

"Secretary Panetta insists that leaders within the Department of Defense exemplify both professional excellence and sound judgment," Little said. "The secretary is committed to ensuring that any improprieties or misconduct by senior officers are dealt with swiftly and appropriately."

A spokesman for Ward said Tuesday that the general "has never been motivated by personal gain and fulfilled each and every mission assigned to him and served his country and the men and women assigned to his commands with distinction."

"While Gen. Ward is not perfect he has always been guided by his faith in God and the belief that there is no greater honor as a patriot than to lead those who choose to serve our nation in the armed forces," spokesman Chris Garrett said in a statement.

Retiring as a three-star general will cost Ward about $30,000 a year in retirement pay, giving him close to $208,802 a year rather than the $236,650 he would receive as a four-star general.

Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had urged Panetta to allow Ward to retire at his full four-star general rank, according to defense officials.

A report by the Defense Department inspector general found that Ward used military vehicles to shuttle his wife on shopping trips and to a spa and billed the government for a refueling stop overnight in Bermuda, where the couple stayed in a $750 suite. The report detailed lengthy stays at lavish hotels for Ward, his wife and his staff members, and the use of five-vehicle motorcades when he traveled to Washington.

The report also said Ward and his wife, Joyce, accepted dinner and Broadway show tickets from a government contractor during a trip during which he went backstage to meet actor Denzel Washington. The couple and several staff members also spent two nights at the Waldorf Astoria hotel.

Other charges were that Ward often extended his overseas trips — particularly those to the U.S. — for personal reasons, resulting in "exponential" increases in costs.

Although the report included responses from Ward to a number of the allegations, investigators often found records and statements that contradicted his explanations. At one point, Ward defended the Bermuda layover, saying that it came up on short notice, which is why his security team had to stay there longer. The report found records showing that the layover had been planned for at least four days in advance.

A common theme running through the report was Ward's insistence that his wife travel with him at government cost, even though it was often not authorized and she performed few official duties. It said he also routinely stayed in high-priced suites in luxury hotels rather than in standard rooms or less expensive locales.

The allegations, coming after a 17-month investigation, delayed Ward's planned April 2011 retirement. And they were an embarrassing end note to his career, since he had claimed a place in history as the military's first commander of Africa Command.

Panetta's options regarding Ward were limited by complex laws and military guidelines. He had only one real choice: Allow Ward to retire as a four-star or demote him and force him to retire as a lieutenant general.

In order for Ward to be demoted to two-star rank, investigators would have to conclude that he also had problems before moving to Africa Command, and officials said that does not appear to be the case.

The investigation dragged on for so long that that Ward was temporarily dropped to two-star status. Under military guidelines, if a full general is not serving in a four-star command or office for more than 60 days, he or she is automatically reduced to two-star rank. Ward would not be able to recoup any back pay for the time at the two-star rank, even though he is being retired at the three-star level.

Major general, or two-star, is the highest rank to which an officer can be promoted by regular military action. Becoming a three-star — lieutenant general — or a four-star general requires a presidential nomination and confirmation by Congress. It, therefore, is not considered permanent and lasts only as long as the person is serving in a job of that rank.

That technical demotion is not uncommon as generals move from job to job and unexpected delays occur. It would not have affected Ward's ability to retire as a four-star, if he had been cleared of the charges.

 Print   Email   Comment | View 18 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
CriticalReader wrote:
Yeah, but did they check his emails yet?????
on November 13,2012 | 10:25PM
aiea2 wrote:
What will be done about Mrs Obama's vacations ??
on November 13,2012 | 11:44PM
Oye_Como_Va wrote:
Nothing.......except increase.
on November 15,2012 | 02:22AM
Recce wrote:
"Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had urged Panetta to allow Ward to retire at his full four-star general rank." Dump Dempsey. He's obviously more loyal to his friends than to integrity, honor, and the U.S. taxpayer.
on November 14,2012 | 02:25AM
lee1957 wrote:
My thoughts exactly. In layman's terms, Ward is a crook; he stole from the taxpayers. The demotion is a few rungs too high.
on November 14,2012 | 10:40AM
Oye_Como_Va wrote:
Wow, with his retirement pay cut will he be able survive on his retirement pay? It's a good thing that he'll have much better healthcare than Obamacare and Medicare, better than the average citizen. Then at least he still retains his other perks, like PX, commissary and military hotel privileges.
on November 15,2012 | 02:27AM
LMO wrote:
"Retiring as a three-star general will cost Ward about $30,000 a year in retirement pay, giving him close to $208,802 a year rather than the $236,650 he would receive as a four-star general." Yeah, but now he will be able to slide in to a cushy, do nothing job that will more than make up for his loss of pay. All these guys do that.
on November 14,2012 | 02:30AM
ejkorvette wrote:
Yeah, he's local yah? he's local yah? Oh how da cute! Classic 59_Chevy, you are such a good guy, and local yah? local yah? YIPPPEEEEEE, YAAHHHOOOOO, LUCKY YOU LIVE HAWAII, YAH? YAH? YAH?
on November 14,2012 | 02:56AM
Shaka_Braddah wrote:
whoa brah, what you been smoking?
on November 14,2012 | 06:05AM
AmbienDaze wrote:
i think ejkorvette is WesleySMori's other screen name. "GOD BLESS HAWAII & AMERICA"!!!!!!!!!!
on November 14,2012 | 09:09AM
honopic wrote:
ej..... please no make me put u on my list. i stay awready workin overtime on allie. engage brain before typing.
on November 14,2012 | 05:12PM
Dimbulb wrote:
He is getting off really easy. Yes, he will be losing some retirement but, if he was an enlisted man he would have lost all his retirement and rank. That is what should have happened to him. Just take a look at what Generals and former Generals are up to now. It is obvious they they don't follow the same rules that they require their soldiers to follow. This is the new breed of Officers I guess.
on November 14,2012 | 04:25AM
bender wrote:
Nothing new here. Generals and Admirals always live like they are royalty, and they are within their own sphere of control. There are even a lot of Navy Captains and Army/AF Colonels who live the good life at taxpayer expense.
on November 14,2012 | 04:40AM
cojef wrote:
Royalty in action. They are considered as princes or barons, earls and lords of the realm. Over $200,000 in retirement pay ain't hay!
on November 14,2012 | 06:28AM
Why do they say "local ties"? He is not local, he was stationed at Schofield Barracks. This high paying guy is not local. Shinsato is local, robert lee is local.
on November 14,2012 | 08:04AM
makamai111 wrote:
im glad- the top does have alot of crooks always thinking they wont get caught remember GOD DONT SLEEP
on November 14,2012 | 09:25AM
ghstar wrote:
The Army looks out for its own. This guy essentially steals (commits theft) from the government, and his "punishment" is to retire with a $200,000 a year pension. When I went through OTS, it was a common answer on all the tests that if you seriously violated the USMJ (and I think this guy did) it was "6, 6, and a BCD". That's six months in the brig, six months loss of pay, and a bad conduct discharge. That sounds about right for this guy.
on November 14,2012 | 10:21AM
Kokoy wrote:
This guy worked hard and put up with a LOT of bs in his time. Why shouldn't he be able to take his wife with him when he travels? I'm quite certain he was traveling at least 80% of the time. Another example of the inferior attacking the superior.
on November 14,2012 | 05:40PM
Breaking News