Quantcast
  

Saturday, April 19, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Ex-'Price is Right' model gets $8.5M in damages

By Anthony McCarthy

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 06:37 a.m. HST, Nov 22, 2012


LOS ANGELES >> The producers of "The Price is Right" owe a former model on the show more than $7.7 million in punitive damages for discriminating against her after a pregnancy, a jury determined Wednesday.

The judgment came one day after the panel determined the game show's producers discriminated against Brandi Cochran. They awarded her nearly $777,000 in actual damages.

Cochran, 41, said she was rejected when she tried to return to work in early 2010 after taking maternity leave. The jury agreed and determined that FremantleMedia North America and The Price is Right Productions owed her more than $8.5 million in all.

"I'm humbled. I'm shocked," Cochran said after the jury announced its verdict. "I'm happy that justice was served today not only for women in the entertainment industry, but women in the workplace."

FremantleMedia said it was standing by its previous statement, which said it expected to be "fully vindicated" after an appeal.

"We believe the verdict in this case was the result of a flawed process in which the court, among other things, refused to allow the jury to hear and consider that 40 percent of our models have been pregnant," and further "important" evidence, FremantleMedia said.

In their defense, producers said they were satisfied with the five models working on the show at the time Cochran sought to return.

Several other former models have sued the series and its longtime host, Bob Barker, who retired in 2007.

Most of the cases involving "Barker's Beauties" — the nickname given the gown-wearing women who presented prizes to contestants — ended with out-of-court settlements.

Comedian-actor Drew Carey followed Barker as the show's host.






More From The Star-Advertiser

Business Briefs




 Print   Email   Comment | View 3 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(3)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
Macadamiamac wrote:
If $8.5million isn't enough "full[y] vindication", how about $15 million? Plus attorney fees and costs.
on November 22,2012 | 08:31AM
stingray65 wrote:
331/2 percent will go to her attorney. Still she got enough to live for a long time.
on November 22,2012 | 09:02AM
64hoo wrote:
don't forget the obama tax hike on the rich. now that shes rich.
on November 22,2012 | 04:45PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News