Quantcast

Tuesday, July 29, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

White House and Congress to talk as 'fiscal cliff' nears

By Andrew Taylor

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 05:00 a.m. HST, Nov 29, 2012


WASHINGTON » An end of the year deadline rapidly approaching, President Barack Obama and Republican House Speaker John Boehner conferred briefly Wednesday night on how to avert the economy-rattling "fiscal cliff," their first one-on-one discussion in five days.

Obama and Boehner's 15-minute phone call came amid increasing anxiety that the White House and top Republicans are wasting time needed to negotiate a way out of a series of tax increases and spending cuts due to begin in January. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and senior White House aide Rob Nabors were also to visit separately today with the four leaders of the House and Senate.

There has been little evident progress in negotiations between the two sides. Republicans complain that the White House is slow-walking the talks and has yet to provide specifics on how Obama would curb the rapid growth of benefit programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

"We have not seen any good-faith effort on the part of this administration to talk about the real problem that we're trying to fix," said House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va.

Obama is mounting a public campaign to build support and leverage in the negotiations, appearing at the White House with middle-class taxpayers and launching a campaign on Twitter to bolster his position.

"Right now, as we speak, Congress can pass a law that would prevent a tax hike on the first $250,000 of everybody's income," Obama said. "And that means that 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small businesses wouldn't see their income taxes go up by a single dime."

Obama is insisting that tax rates go up on family income exceeding $250,000; Boehner is adamant that any new tax revenues come from overhauling the tax code, clearing out tax breaks and lowering rates for all.

Republicans are also demanding significant cuts to so-called entitlement programs like Medicare, such as an increase in the eligibility age for the program from 65 to perhaps 67.

"It's time for the president and Democrats to get serious about the spending problem that our country has," Boehner said at a news conference Wednesday in the Capitol. Boehner, like Obama, expressed optimism that a deal could be reached.

At issue are steep, across-the-board cuts to the Pentagon and domestic programs set to strike the economy in January as well as the expiration of Bush-era tax cuts on income, investments, married couples and families with children. That combination of tax increases and spending cuts would wring more than half a trillion dollars from the economy in the first nine months of next year, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

No one anticipates a stalemate lasting that long, but many experts worry that even allowing the spending cuts and tax increases for a relatively brief period could rattle financial markets.

From their public statements, Obama and Boehner appear at an impasse over raising the two top tax rates from 33 percent and 35 percent to 36 percent and 39.6 percent. Democrats seem confident that Boehner ultimately will have to crumble, but Obama has a lot at stake as well, including a clear agenda for priorities like an overhaul of the nation's immigration laws.

Obama is also meeting privately today with his defeated Republican rival Mitt Romney. The president has cast his victory over Romney as a sign that Americans back his tax proposals, which were a centerpiece of his re-election campaign.

While in Washington, Romney will also meet with his former running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan. The Wisconsin congressman is chairman of the House Budget Committee and deeply involved in the fiscal cliff discussions.

Associated Press writer Julie Pace contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 7 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(7)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
loquaciousone wrote:
If Obama and the Congress cannot solve this Fiscal Cliff thing we should throw them all of the Pali.
on November 29,2012 | 06:08AM
serious wrote:
Agreed, but Obama, in his threat to eliminate the tax breaks, i.e. the cap gains and dividends is forcing companies to distribute their cash to their stockholders in the form of dividends before the 'cliff. What that means is the money that could have been used for expansion and job creation ain't happening!! But HE has never run a business, etc.
on November 29,2012 | 06:56AM
loquaciousone wrote:
It takes two to tango and placing all the blame on Obama is what created the Fiscal cliff in the first place.
on November 29,2012 | 07:25AM
serious wrote:
Oh, I agree with you--the blame goes to both parties. But after four years of blaming Bush--get off it. Read ANY book on the recession and the two names, not Bush, come up---Chris Dodd and Barney Frank. Bush screwed up in that he should have taken some regulatory measures to stop the mortgage bust. But the control was in those two legislators I mentioned. I agree with Buffet, BTW, $250K income is minimum wages in some cities, make it $500K and I think it will get through.
on November 29,2012 | 07:59AM
DowntownGreen wrote:
And therein lies the problem: "$250K income (and by the way, that is TAXABLE income) is minimum wages in some cities"... that is simply ridiculous.
on November 29,2012 | 08:50AM
serious wrote:
Try living in Manhattan or San Francisco.
on November 29,2012 | 09:47AM
serious wrote:
I did not make my point, just GOOGLE it. In NYC, the sales taxes are about 10%, the income tax 16%, then add the federal income tax and fica, etc not even mentioning medical insurance and other necessary items and you end up with about $100K out of that $250K . Then comes housing, food clothing. It's the real thing. I am not talking about stock brokers "middle income"--husband is a teamster, wife an RN--gross $250K-- seriously not much income. Average cost of bring up a child--look it up. When I said minimum wage $250K sounds like a lot, but work it up!!!
on November 29,2012 | 10:07AM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Political Radar
`My side’

Political Radar
‘He reminds me of me’

Bionic Reporter
Needing a new knee

Warrior Beat
Monday musings

Small Talk
Burning money

Political Radar
On policy

Warrior Beat
Apple fallout