Quantcast
  

Thursday, April 24, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Surprise: New insurance fee in health overhaul law

By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar

Associated Press

POSTED:


WASHINGTON >> Your medical plan is facing an unexpected expense, so you probably are, too. It's a new, $63-per-head fee to cushion the cost of covering people with pre-existing conditions under President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.

The charge, buried in a recent regulation, works out to tens of millions of dollars for the largest companies, employers say. Most of that is likely to be passed on to workers.

Employee benefits lawyer Chantel Sheaks calls it a "sleeper issue" with significant financial consequences, particularly for large employers.

"Especially at a time when we are facing economic uncertainty, (companies will) be hit with a multi-million dollar assessment without getting anything back for it," said Sheaks, a principal at Buck Consultants, a Xerox subsidiary.

Based on figures provided in the regulation, employer and individual health plans covering an estimated 190 million Americans could owe the per-person fee.

The Obama administration says it is a temporary assessment levied for three years starting in 2014, designed to raise $25 billion. It starts at $63 and then declines.

Most of the money will go into a fund administered by the Health and Human Services Department. It will be used to cushion health insurance companies from the initial hard-to-predict costs of covering uninsured people with medical problems. Under the law, insurers will be forbidden from turning away the sick as of Jan. 1, 2014.

The program "is intended to help millions of Americans purchase affordable health insurance, reduce unreimbursed usage of hospital and other medical facilities by the uninsured and thereby lower medical expenses and premiums for all," the Obama administration says in the regulation. An accompanying media fact sheet issued Nov. 30 referred to "contributions" without detailing the total cost and scope of the program.

Of the total pot, $5 billion will go directly to the U.S. Treasury, apparently to offset the cost of shoring up employer-sponsored coverage for early retirees.

The $25 billion fee is part of a bigger package of taxes and fees to finance Obama's expansion of coverage to the uninsured. It all comes to about $700 billion over 10 years, and includes higher Medicare taxes effective this Jan. 1 on individuals making more than $200,000 per year or couples making more than $250,000. People above those threshold amounts also face an additional 3.8 percent tax on their investment income.

But the insurance fee had been overlooked as employers focused on other costs in the law, including fines for medium and large firms that don't provide coverage.

"This kind of came out of the blue and was a surprisingly large amount," said Gretchen Young, senior vice president for health policy at the ERISA Industry Committee, a group that represents large employers on benefits issues.

Word started getting out in the spring, said Young, but hard cost estimates surfaced only recently with the new regulation. It set the per capita rate at $5.25 per month, which works out to $63 a year.

America's Health Insurance Plans, the major industry trade group for health insurers, says the fund is an important program that will help stabilize the market and mitigate cost increases for consumers as the changes in Obama's law take effect.

But employers already offering coverage to their workers don't see why they have to pony up for the stabilization fund, which mainly helps the individual insurance market. The redistribution puts the biggest companies on the hook for tens of millions of dollars.

"It just adds on to everything else that is expected to increase health care costs," said economist Paul Fronstin of the nonprofit Employee Benefit Research Institute.

The fee will be assessed on all "major medical" insurance plans, including those provided by employers and those purchased individually by consumers. Large employers will owe the fee directly. That's because major companies usually pay upfront for most of the health care costs of their employees. It may not be apparent to workers, but the insurance company they deal with is basically an agent administering the plan for their employer.

The fee will total $12 billion in 2014, $8 billion in 2015 and $5 billion in 2016. That means the per-head assessment would be smaller each year, around $40 in 2015 instead of $63.

It will phase out completely in 2017 — unless Congress, with lawmakers searching everywhere for revenue to reduce federal deficits — decides to extend it.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 14 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(14)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
ISCREAM wrote:
Screu the rich...screu the job makers....give it all to Dem law makers...economic redistribution at its finest.
on December 10,2012 | 07:00PM
Mythman wrote:
All you earn, we own, says the government. Money comes from the government, not from you and me and money is God now and for how long?
on December 10,2012 | 07:10PM
Mythman wrote:
The government giveth and the government taketh - Long Live the Government.
on December 10,2012 | 07:09PM
SteveToo wrote:
No dude, before the government can giveth it must first taketh-----So what you should have said was: "The government taketh and the government giveth some of it back".
on December 10,2012 | 08:07PM
fairgame947 wrote:
Oh my, what a surprise! NOT!
on December 10,2012 | 07:32PM
bikemom wrote:
". . . it is a temporary assessment levied for three years. . . " Why don't they just say "long-term"?
on December 10,2012 | 07:50PM
ichiban wrote:
Kiss my grits--gonna phase out in 2017. Right and the moon is made of cheese. Government just got another revenue stream to shore up their mismanagement our national budget. Hello Obamacare, hello socialism. Maybe I should be uninsured. That way I will receive the Obamacare benefits.
on December 10,2012 | 08:25PM
saywhatyouthink wrote:
That may be just what a lot of folks do!
on December 10,2012 | 08:36PM
soundofreason wrote:
And the fine for NOT having insurance......is less than paying for insurance. A win win.
on December 10,2012 | 08:46PM
noheawilli wrote:
"We got to pass the law to know what's in the law...or was that a paraphrase. But the Prez said he would not raise taxes on us?
on December 10,2012 | 08:26PM
soundofreason wrote:
And they BOUGHT it!! Who's laughing now? All of this tax the rich....free insurance...ALL is going to get paid by someone else up front and THEN that cost will simply be passed down. He's simply succeeded in taxing the 98%.........indirectly. Just jumping through a couple hoops to do it. But the simpletons won't see it until it hits them. Many of them when their hours get cut to avoid Obamacare. About halfway through filling out their application for their SECOND job - the light will go off.
on December 10,2012 | 08:50PM
9ronboz wrote:
I didn't vote for this guy
on December 10,2012 | 08:39PM
Pookie_Baby wrote:
This is just the beginning. Don't cry if you voted for this monkey.
on December 10,2012 | 09:14PM
AniMatsuri wrote:
Those against Obamacare kept saying stuff like this was going to hit us. That the bad elements where timed to kick in after he was elected the 2nd time.This is only a surprise to the lapdog media who just pass on whatever this tyrant tells them to.
on December 10,2012 | 10:13PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News