Quantcast
  

Wednesday, April 16, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 18 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

Boehner agrees to Sandy aid vote on Friday

By Andrew Miga and Larry Margasak

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 03:17 p.m. HST, Jan 02, 2013


WASHINGTON >> Under intense pressure from angry Republicans, House Speaker John Boehner agreed today to a vote this week on aid for Superstorm Sandy recovery.

The speaker will schedule a vote Friday for $9 billion for the national flood insurance program and another on Jan. 15 for a remaining $51 billion in the package, Republican Rep. Peter King of New York said after emerging from a meeting with Boehner and GOP lawmakers from New York and New Jersey. The votes will be taken by the new Congress that will be sworn in Thursday.

King left the session with Boehner without the anger that led him to rip into the speaker Tuesday night.

"It was a very positive meeting," King said, adding that Boehner, R-Ohio, assured the lawmakers present that the money from the two House votes would roughly equal the $60 billion package of aid that passed the Senate.

Since the votes will be taken in the new Congress, the Senate also will have to approve the legislation. If the House, as expected, approves the $9 billion flood insurance proposal, the Senate plans to move quickly in hopes of approving the aid on a voice vote Friday. The flood insurance money will help pay for claims by home and business owners with coverage.

Sandy was the most costly natural disaster since Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and one of the worst storms ever in the Northeast.

"Getting critical aid to the victims of Hurricane Sandy should be the first priority in the new Congress, and that was reaffirmed today with members of the New York and New Jersey delegations," Boehner said in a joint statement with House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va.

Boehner's decision Tuesday night to cancel an expected vote on Sandy aid before Congress ends its current session provoked a firestorm of criticism from New York, New Jersey and adjacent states where the money will go, including many lawmakers in his own party.

According to King, Boehner explained that after the contentious vote to avoid major tax increases and spending cuts called the "fiscal cliff," Boehner didn't think it was the right time to schedule the vote before the current Congress went out of business.

"What's done is done. The end result will be New York, New Jersey and Connecticut will receive the funding they deserve. We made our position clear last night. That's in the past," King said.

Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., added, "We do believe we have an iron clad commitment."

The Senate approved a $60.4 billion measure Friday to help with recovery from the October storm that devastated parts of New York, New Jersey and nearby states. The House Appropriations Committee has drafted a smaller, $27 billion measure for immediate recovery needs and a second amendment for $33 billion to meet longer-term needs.

The $9 billion in flood insurance money to be voted on Friday was originally in the $27 billion measure. The votes on Jan. 15 will be for $18 billion in immediate assistance and $33 billion for longer-term projects, including projects to protect against future storms, King said.

Much of the money in the proposals is for immediate help for victims and other recovery and rebuilding efforts. The aid is intended to help states rebuild public infrastructure such as roads and tunnels and help thousands of people displaced from their homes.

Some $5.4 million is for the Federal Emergency Management Agency's disaster relief fund, $5.4 billion is to help transit agencies in New York and New Jersey rebuild and another $3.9 billion is for the Housing and Urban Development Department's development fund to repair hospitals, utilities and small businesses.

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, a Republican, was among those sharply criticizing Boehner before the speaker changed course.

Christie said he was frustrated after Boehner withdrew the bill Tuesday night and tried to call him four times that night, but none of the calls were returned. Christie complained about the "toxic internal politics" of the House majority. Christie said he had worked hard to persuade House members to support Sandy aid, and was given assurances by GOP leaders that the bill would be voted on before Thursday.

"There is no reason for me at the moment to believe anything they tell me," Christie said before Boehner announced there would be votes this month.

King had branded Boehner's initial decision to pull the bill a "cruel knife in the back" to New York and New Jersey.

King was among an angry chorus of New York and New Jersey lawmakers from both parties who blasted Boehner, with some saying his move was a "betrayal."

In considering the Sandy aid package, the speaker was caught between conservative lawmakers who want to offset any increase in spending and Northeast and mid-Atlantic lawmakers determined to help their states recover more than two months after the storm hit.

The criticism of Boehner on the House floor was personal at times, and reflected in part the frustration among the rank-and-file over the decision to press ahead with a vote on the fiscal cliff deal engineered by the White House and Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell. Boehner had been struggling with conservatives who complained that the economic package didn't include enough spending cuts.

Reps. Michael Grimm, a Republican, and Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat, said in angry House floor remarks that while they did not agree on much, Boehner's decision amounted to a "betrayal" and a crushing blow to states battered by the storm.

President Barack Obama also called for an immediate House vote. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., raised the political temperature even more. She said Boehner should come to Staten Island and the Rockaways to explain his decision to families whose homes and businesses were destroyed. "But I doubt he has the dignity nor the guts to do it," Gillibrand said.

Obama, meanwhile, called for House Republicans to vote on the Sandy aid "without delay for our fellow Americans." The president said in a written statement that many people in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut are trying to recover from the storm and need "immediate support with the bulk of winter still in front of us."

The White House said Obama spoke today with Christie about the importance of the disaster aid bill, and that the president's staff was in touch with New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo's team too as Obama lobbied for House action.

Christie and Cuomo, a Democrat, issued a joint statement, saying, "The fact that days continue to go by while people suffer, families are out of their homes, and men and women remain jobless and struggling during these harsh winter months is a dereliction of duty."

Rep. Frank Pallone Jr., D-N.J., blamed tea party lawmakers and conservatives who were reluctant to approve new spending soon after the debate over the "fiscal cliff" budget issues for the sudden move by GOP leaders. He said the move was "deplorable."

More than $2 billion in federal funds has been spent so far on relief efforts for 11 states and the District of Columbia struck by the storm, one of the worst ever to hit the Northeast. The Federal Emergency Management Agency's disaster relief fund still has about $4.3 billion, enough to pay for recovery efforts into early spring, according to officials. The unspent FEMA money can only be used for emergency services, said Pallone.

New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, District of Columbia, West Virginia, Virginia, Maryland, New Hampshire, Delaware, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania and Massachusetts are receiving federal FEMA aid.

Sandy was blamed for at least 120 deaths and battered coastline areas from North Carolina to Maine. New York, New Jersey and Connecticut were the hardest hit states and suffered high winds, flooding and storm surges. The storm damaged or destroyed more than 72,000 homes and businesses in New Jersey. In New York, 305,000 housing units were damaged or destroyed and more than 265,000 businesses were affected.

___

Associated Press writer Donna Cassata contributed to this report.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 18 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(18)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
serious wrote:
The Northwest has a huge electorial vote. Remember when Kauai got hit with the hurricane and our "senior", inefficent senators got us all those billions of dollars in relief?? Me neither! It's a myth of senior senators getting the perks--If you come from a state of a million people--good luck--most US cities are 10-or more that size. Clout is the answer.
on January 2,2013 | 12:39PM
ellinaskyrt wrote:
AP News ran a story on September 15, 1992 titled, "Senate Approves $3 Billion for Hawaii Hurricane." That was just a couple of days after Iniki hit. Seriously.
on January 2,2013 | 01:05PM
busterb wrote:
We got over $11B. Dunno where the ineffective comes from. Does FOX have a browser now?
on January 2,2013 | 01:24PM
copperwire9 wrote:
That's complete nonsense, and you know it.
on January 2,2013 | 02:05PM
DowntownGreen wrote:
He/she didn't say we didn't get... just that he/she can't remember. There are lots of causes for selective memory.
on January 2,2013 | 02:43PM
jrboi96786 wrote:
I'm a democrat and I really like this dude. He is not bias toward his own party and though he blames the congress, he did not hesitate to be specific on who he is pointing his finger to. I know $60 billion is a lot but he did made a good point that New York and New Jersey are among the states that contributes a huge sum of tax payers money into the government. Those states have never hesitate to help those bottom feeders in the South when they needed help. New York and New Jersey deserves the funding no matter how much it is. Even though I don't agree with Chris Christie on some of his political views, as long as he put his people first before his political ideology I would vote for him if he ever run for Presidency. I think he would make a good President.
on January 2,2013 | 12:57PM
nomakeshame wrote:
I guess a hurricane and its massive flooding is nothing compared to tornadoes. The hold up does seem political being that the entire Northeast voted blue and the majority of the House is painted Southern Red.
on January 2,2013 | 01:10PM
CriticalReader wrote:
Christie just gave GOP members permission to step outside the electrified fences put up by the neo-conservative usurpers of their party. The question is, how many of those members are smart, courageous, or human enough to walk through the opening?
on January 2,2013 | 01:01PM
kainalu wrote:
Christie represents the old guard, a moderate-Republican that can adapt to the times. Otherwise, we're observing the same thing - a party parlayzed by poisoned-tea.
on January 2,2013 | 02:45PM
false wrote:
Just goes to show they eat their own kind. LOL
on January 2,2013 | 01:19PM
CriticalReader wrote:
Neo-con (and therefore misguided) reaction to Boehner's losing approach is to scheme to replace him as speaker with some other neo-conservative. But, what America wants is an efficient approach (or at least the appearance of efficiency) from Congress and particularly from House perceived as obstructionist for obstruction's sake. Watch for a moderate, maybe even from EITHER party backed by a bi-partisan coalition (a la HI House) to emerge as a Speaker candidate. 24 hours is a loooooong time in American politics nowadays.
on January 2,2013 | 01:51PM
Pacej001 wrote:
"America wants an efficient approach from Congress". Stop it, you're killing me with your George Orwell stand-up routine. Efficient approach? Good one. -------------------What big, fat obese, maxed out credit card America (at least 51.4%) wants is a continuation of the free lollypops and lullabies and a perpetuation of the fairy land in which we not only borrow money from the Chinese for disaster recovery, but in which we lard up our disaster recovery legislation with gotta have stuff like new AMTRAK lines and Alaska fisheries programs. Nothing like a couple of projects in Florida or Alaska to stimulate the Sandy-damaged economy in the NE AND we get to borrow 40% of this pork money from China, TOO. I shudder to think what damage the Neo-conservatives (thought that buzz term had to do with foreign policy,but, never mind, it sounds negative, so just go with it) would have done if they'd just stuck to legislating about, you know, actual disaster relief.
on January 2,2013 | 03:52PM
CriticalReader wrote:
Your de rigueur GOP doom and gloom routine is creating the psychological barrier to America's acting with strength. certainty, and the entrepreneurial spirit that will and always has been the make or break trademark of this Country. While you channel "Glum:" from the 70's cartoon "Gulliver of Lilliput" ("oh noooooo, we'll never make iiiiiit") thinking it's "cool", all you're doing is regurgitating a fear mongering aimed at advancing the philosophy of unbridled greed and lack of social responsibility of those who moved out of your neighborhood uptown a long, long time ago. Look around you. IF anyone will actually share the same physical space with you, then there's a better than even chance you advocate things to make them suffer more. But, more importantly, your nitpicking at small details demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of the big picture and exactly where the "cuts" you advocate must actually should and can come from. Let's see your GOP heroes cut from an over far bloated military budget and make meaningful changes to Social Security for those who don't need it (as much). Those cuts make total economic sense. But they hurt the supposed GOP base. When the first GOP money proposal contains those cuts, then you can talk with some measure of credibility.
on January 2,2013 | 07:18PM
Pacej001 wrote:
There's more ignorance, denial, and outright stupidity in your comments than time to respond to them.
on January 3,2013 | 05:48AM
CriticalReader wrote:
I'm so tired of living in the environment of the manufactured fear created by today's GOP. We can't continue this way as a nation. True patriots within the GOP need to put their neo-conservative elements on the sidelines so that American can get back to considering itself "GREAT" as opposed to "doomed".
on January 2,2013 | 07:44PM
NJCOMMENT wrote:
Will that self-serving orange faced rocking while walking chain smoking piece of garbage still be speaker in the new congress?
on January 2,2013 | 02:57PM
CriticalReader wrote:
The true MAJORITY in the House of Representatives is comprised of the 257 House members who voted to DO WHAT AMERICA WANTED. That's the majority that should be led by the real leaders amongst them (and Boehner is not a leader amongst them despite his face saving vote). They are the ones who represent America regardless of Party affiliation. They are the ones who have the ability to find a good ole American Democracy compromise to our problems. The rest are either extremists (once again, regardless of their party affiliation) or chickens who earned the right to be relegated to the sidelines. The up and down vote was a test of responsibility and responsiveness. 257 passed the test. Place the potentially important and relevant (POTENTIALLY) House of Representatives in a position to help govern effectively (as opposed to stupidly or dogmatically)
on January 2,2013 | 07:34PM
HD36 wrote:
Does a person who owned a $980,000 vacation home on the beach also get his mansion rebuilt using Federal taxpayer funds? Just wondering because if they can afford the house, they should have bought insurance.
on January 2,2013 | 02:57PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News