Quantcast
  

Wednesday, April 16, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

4 arrested for defying San Francisco's nudity ban

By Haven Daley

Associated Press

POSTED:
LAST UPDATED: 10:43 a.m. HST, Feb 02, 2013


SAN FRANCISCO » Four protesters were arrested entirely in the buff as they took to the steps of San Francisco City Hall in a brazen challenge of the city's ban on public nudity on Friday, the first day it went into effect.

One woman and three men — one wearing just a mesh thong — were taken into custody as about a dozen other protesters in various states of undress paraded around with painted slogans on their bodies, holding up signs with messages such as "The Human Body is Beautiful."

Police gave them a 15-minute warning to disperse or put pants on before officers arrested those who failed to cover themselves. The protesters said their arrest would advance the cause of "body freedom."

"No matter what, we're going to continue practicing body freedom," said Gypsy Taub, a mother of two who hosts a local cable program devoted to the nudist cause. "In a society that's repressed and crazy, that glorifies war and at the same time criminalizes the human body ... nudity is a political statement."

In December, the Board of Supervisors voted 7-4 in favor of the ordinance, which prohibits exposed genitals in most public places, including streets, sidewalks and public transit. A federal judge ruled Tuesday that nudity was not protected free speech and upheld San Francisco's ban on most displays of public nudity.

Protesters vowed to appeal the judge's decision.

Police spokesman Albie Esparza said the arrests were simply an attempt to enforce compliance with the law, which the city enacted after residents complained about people in various stages of undress.

"We're not here to arrest and cite people if we don't have to, but if we have to, we will enforce the law," he said. "We want to admonish as many people as possible and try to gain compliance."

Activists challenging the measure also had argued that the ordinance was unfair because it grants exceptions for nudity at permitted public events such as the city's gay pride parade. They complained that forcing people to cover up would undermine San Francisco's reputation as a city without inhibitions.







 Print   Email   Comment | View 8 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

COMMENTS
(8)
You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
cojef wrote:
Whoopie! When is the next "hoe-down", got to see it with mine own eyes, as seeing is believing.
on February 2,2013 | 10:11AM
cojef wrote:
oop! sent for approval for using frivolous language.
on February 2,2013 | 10:13AM
redneckMT wrote:
Just making their families proud.
on February 2,2013 | 10:15AM
RichardCory wrote:
Seeing as how there's no rational reason for nudity to be criminalized, yes, I would be proud if any of them were my family.
on February 2,2013 | 01:19PM
onevoice82 wrote:
Great! This advances the feminist movement even further which we all know is great for men! It has never been easier to get a woman naked on her back without any committments and now we get to view the goods before we ask her to bed. I love it. Way to go dummies!
on February 2,2013 | 01:48PM
Bdpapa wrote:
I'd like to see that!
on February 2,2013 | 10:56AM
bumbye wrote:
Oh I thought they were pre-celebrating the 49ers victory. Oops.
on February 2,2013 | 12:35PM
KING_CRABBE wrote:
i bet, it there were 3 women and one man, they would not have arrested them............
on February 2,2013 | 07:05PM
IN OTHER NEWS
Breaking News
Blogs
Court Sense
Musings on Shamburger

Political Radar
HB 1700 — Day 1

Hoops Talk
Aloha Shamburger

Political Radar
Stacked

Political Radar
HFFA

Warrior Beat
All’s fair

Political Radar
Apology