Wednesday, July 30, 2014         

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

N. Korea aggression could strengthen U.S.-China bond


AP National Security Writer

LAST UPDATED: 01:32 p.m. HST, Apr 05, 2013

WASHINGTON » North Korea's latest outburst of nuclear and military threats has given the U.S. a rare opportunity to build bridges with China — a potential silver lining to the simmering crisis that could revitalize the Obama administration's flagging policy pivot to Asia.

The architect of the administration's Asia policy described a subtle change in Chinese thinking as a result of Pyongyang's recent nuclear tests, rocket launches and abandonment of the armistice that ended the 1950-53 war with South Korea.

Pyongyang has taken similar actions in the past, prompting Washington to step up military readiness in the region to soothe allies South Korea and Japan. But in an unusual rebuke this week, Beijing called North Korea's moves "regrettable" — amounting to a slap from Pyongyang's strongest economic and diplomatic supporter.

"They, I think, recognize that the actions that North Korea has taken in recent months and years are in fact antithetical to their own national security interests," former Assistant Secretary of State Kurt Campbell told a panel Thursday at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies.

"There is a subtle shift in Chinese foreign policy" toward North Korea, said Campbell, who retired in February as the administration's top diplomat in East Asia and the Pacific region. "I don't think that provocative path can be lost on Pyongyang. ... I think that they have succeeded in undermining trust and confidence in Beijing."

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland described "good unity" between the U.S. and China in responding to North Korea.

"The issue here is to continue to recognize that the threats we share are common, and the approaches are more likely to be more effective if we can work well together," she told reporters Thursday.

For now, the crisis has given new rise to the White House's decision to bolster U.S. economic and security in the region that for years was sidelined as a priority by war and terrorism in the Middle East and North Africa.

Much of the policy has centered on China — both in strengthening diplomatic ties and economic trade. But China is an unreliable American ally and has been suspicious about the U.S. entreaty, which it sees as economic competition on its own turf.

Now, North Korea's threats have focused China and the U.S. on a regional security threat instead of an economic rivalry.

"Part of the pivot is to also take a more active interest in the security issues in Asia," Sen. Ben Cardin, D-Md., who chairs a committee overseeing East Asia, said in an interview this week. "And clearly, North Korea is the most difficult country and one that represents security issues for the countries in Asia, as well as indirectly affects U.S. interests."

"With North Korea making these noises, it will require the U.S. to deal with security issues in Asia," Cardin said.

North Korea has ratcheted up an almost daily string of threats toward the U.S., South Korea and Japan and moved a missile with "considerable range" to its east coast, South Korea's defense minister said Thursday. But he emphasized that the missile was not capable of reaching the United States, and officials in Seoul and Washington agree there are no signs that Pyongyang is preparing for a full-scale conflict.

Last year, North Korea launched two long-range rockets — it claims they were satellites but were widely believed to be missiles — and in February announced it conducted an underground nuclear test. A month later, the country declared its 1953 armistice with South Korea void. And this week, Pyongyang said it would restart a shuttered nuclear reactor and ramp up production of atomic weapons material, and began turning away South Korean workers from jointly run factories in the North.

Much of the bellicosity is seen as an effort to shore up loyalty among citizens and the military for North Korea's young leader, Kim Jong Un. But U.S. and U.N. sanctions against Pyongyang after the February nuclear test fueled tensions and began the unusually high level of threats.

It's also a response to annual U.S.-South Korean military drills that — intentional or not — antagonize the North. The ongoing drills have shown a conspicuous display of firepower, including flying American bombers and fighter jets in recent weeks over South Korea and off the Korean peninsula's coast, where a U.S. missile-defense ship also has been deployed.

North Korea's military issued a statement saying its troops have been authorized to counter U.S. "aggression" with "powerful practical military counteractions," including nuclear weapons. Experts doubt Pyongyang is able to launch nuclear-tipped missiles, although the extent of its nuclear arsenal is unclear.

China historically has been lax on enforcing international sanctions against the North. But in what the U.S. took as a positive development, China signed on to stiffer measures in the latest round of U.N. Security Council sanctions announced after the February nuclear test, and there are initial indications that it's increasing cargo inspections. Whether this will lead to concrete steps that will crimp North Korea's weapons' programs and illicit trade in arms, however, remains to be seen.

Patrick Cronin, an Asia expert at the Center for a New American Security and a senior State Department official during the George W. Bush administration, said Beijing also is helping set up back-channel negotiations with North Korea to ease the tensions.

But ultimately, he said, the U.S. isn't likely to succeed in winning China over as a reliable partner against North Korea beyond the current flare-up.

"There is an opportunity for the U.S. and China to renew cooperation on a North Korean strategy," Cronin said. "But we can't put all of our hopes on that cooperation, because it's been less than satisfying in the past. There are limits to how far China and the U.S. have coincidental interests with regard to North Korea. But it's not enough — because, more likely, we're likely to fail."

Asia expert and peace activist Hyun Lee agreed that Washington will be unlikely to turn Beijing against North Korea in the long run. But she said China does not want to see a stepped-up U.S. military presence in the region, and Beijing certainly doesn't want a war on its borders.

China "doesn't want to deal with headaches like the tension between the U.S. and North Korea," said Lee of the Working Group for Peace and Demilitarization in Asia and the Pacific. "I think China is trying to restrain both sides."

 Print   Email   Comment | View 6 Comments   Most Popular   Save   Post   Retweet

You must be subscribed to participate in discussions
By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the TERMS OF SERVICE. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. Because only subscribers are allowed to comment, we have your personal information and are able to contact you. If your comments are inappropriate, you may receive a warning, and if you persist with such comments you may be banned from posting. To report comments that you believe do not follow our guidelines, email commentfeedback@staradvertiser.com.
Leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment.
loquaciousone wrote:
The Dear Bleeder needs more than a slap. The boy blunders needs a good arse whupping.
on April 5,2013 | 03:58AM
manakuke wrote:
During the last Korean war Uncle’s interrogation team was preempted by a Colonel and his entourage. The plane never made it, Chicom cannons were waiting. Uncle never complained about being ‘bumped’ again!
on April 5,2013 | 06:35AM
pcman wrote:
Renewal of hostilities would result in a pouring of KN refugees into China, moreso than the previous hostilities that were paused in 1953. The reason is that the US will lend its capabilities of long range bombing of strategic targets in the central parts of KN. Such targets are the KN nuclear facilities, submarine facilities and their meager military/industrial support base. There was no strategic bombing early in the previous hostilities. Refugees moving into China would cause a population pressure on food and housing and clogging of roads and logistical support moving from China to KN. US and KS would also mine off commercial harbors and interdict railways to stop Chinese aid to KN,
on April 5,2013 | 09:25AM
Maneki_Neko wrote:
Rule #1: There is no special US-China "relationship".

Rule #2: China will do what is in its best interests.

Rule #3: If in doubt, revert to Rule #1.

on April 5,2013 | 09:30AM
loquaciousone wrote:
Rule# 4: Be nice to China because they own 40% of our Navy.
on April 5,2013 | 09:41AM
CriticalReader wrote:
All the North Korean bluster is based on two fundamental beliefs: 1) That the US will not strike FIRST militarily in the region; and, 2) that China will never cooperate with the US to curb North Korean aggression (either words or deeds). Kim also seems to have made a self-entertaining game of proving these things to the world. The one huge question is whether or not belief #2 is supported by Chinese acquiescence in any way. Obviously, the piece above indicates that it is. But, what is really going on with North Korea? Human Rights violations? check. Adversarial Nuclear Threat? check. State sponsored terrorism on US allies? check. Direct and open threat of military, AND NUCLEAR action against US citizens? check. China's acquiescence to North Korea on any level is acquiescence to all those things. Bottom line. Seems like it's time to demand China remove all signs, both covert and overt, of support for North Korea's stances (you kinow, like the one where they threaten to bomb us with nuclear bombs). Seems like it's also not unreasonable nor unwise for the US and China to display complete cooperation in the region, including even possibly permitting the US to station forces on the North Korea/China border. China needs to act like a super power in sync with the other super powers of the world. It's time to make China put up or shut up. They also owe us an apology ANYWAY for the msg poisoning they've inflicted upon us, and their LYING about it ("fly lice no mo' msg" - yeah riiiiiiight). Time to make a stand.
on April 5,2013 | 10:03AM
Breaking News